Jeff Peakall, JAMES L. Best, Jaco H. Baas, Paul B. Wignall, David M. Hodgson, Piotr Łapcik
{"title":"流动诱导的界面变形结构(FIDS):对古流、流动动力学和基质流变学解释的影响","authors":"Jeff Peakall, JAMES L. Best, Jaco H. Baas, Paul B. Wignall, David M. Hodgson, Piotr Łapcik","doi":"10.1111/sed.13219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sole structures on the base of turbidites, and other bed types, are typically classified into scour marks and tool marks, such as flutes, grooves, skim marks and prod marks. Yet, there are a range of other common sole marks that are unrelated to scouring or tools, and whose origin is poorly understood. Prominent among these sole structures are longitudinal ridges and furrows, and ‘dinosaur leather’ structures associated with mud ripples. Herein, these features are described and it is argued that they are the product of deformation of the substrate during a sediment gravity flow event. In these flow‐induced interfacial deformation structures (FIDS), a soft cohesive substrate undergoes deformation in response to a buoyant force induced by the denser basal component of an overriding flow, and the flow interacts with this buoyant deformation through shear to remould the substrate. Variations in the relative strength of these buoyant and shear‐induced forces explain the wide range of FIDS that can form. This FIDS model reinterprets the formation of longitudinal ridges and furrows, which have previously been classified as scour marks, and explains their distinctive spatial patterns. Furthermore, the new model builds on the seminal work of Dżułyński and colleagues in the 1960s and 1970s, who identified that these structures contain key palaeocurrent information, and it is argued that such information is largely under‐utilized. Importantly, alongside their utility as palaeocurrent indicators, FIDS provide insights into the rheology of the substrate at the time of their formation, and thus the nature of basal flow conditions in the formative flows.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flow‐induced interfacial deformation structures (FIDS): Implications for the interpretation of palaeocurrents, flow dynamics and substrate rheology\",\"authors\":\"Jeff Peakall, JAMES L. Best, Jaco H. Baas, Paul B. Wignall, David M. Hodgson, Piotr Łapcik\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/sed.13219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sole structures on the base of turbidites, and other bed types, are typically classified into scour marks and tool marks, such as flutes, grooves, skim marks and prod marks. Yet, there are a range of other common sole marks that are unrelated to scouring or tools, and whose origin is poorly understood. Prominent among these sole structures are longitudinal ridges and furrows, and ‘dinosaur leather’ structures associated with mud ripples. Herein, these features are described and it is argued that they are the product of deformation of the substrate during a sediment gravity flow event. In these flow‐induced interfacial deformation structures (FIDS), a soft cohesive substrate undergoes deformation in response to a buoyant force induced by the denser basal component of an overriding flow, and the flow interacts with this buoyant deformation through shear to remould the substrate. Variations in the relative strength of these buoyant and shear‐induced forces explain the wide range of FIDS that can form. This FIDS model reinterprets the formation of longitudinal ridges and furrows, which have previously been classified as scour marks, and explains their distinctive spatial patterns. Furthermore, the new model builds on the seminal work of Dżułyński and colleagues in the 1960s and 1970s, who identified that these structures contain key palaeocurrent information, and it is argued that such information is largely under‐utilized. Importantly, alongside their utility as palaeocurrent indicators, FIDS provide insights into the rheology of the substrate at the time of their formation, and thus the nature of basal flow conditions in the formative flows.\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/sed.13219\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sed.13219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Flow‐induced interfacial deformation structures (FIDS): Implications for the interpretation of palaeocurrents, flow dynamics and substrate rheology
Sole structures on the base of turbidites, and other bed types, are typically classified into scour marks and tool marks, such as flutes, grooves, skim marks and prod marks. Yet, there are a range of other common sole marks that are unrelated to scouring or tools, and whose origin is poorly understood. Prominent among these sole structures are longitudinal ridges and furrows, and ‘dinosaur leather’ structures associated with mud ripples. Herein, these features are described and it is argued that they are the product of deformation of the substrate during a sediment gravity flow event. In these flow‐induced interfacial deformation structures (FIDS), a soft cohesive substrate undergoes deformation in response to a buoyant force induced by the denser basal component of an overriding flow, and the flow interacts with this buoyant deformation through shear to remould the substrate. Variations in the relative strength of these buoyant and shear‐induced forces explain the wide range of FIDS that can form. This FIDS model reinterprets the formation of longitudinal ridges and furrows, which have previously been classified as scour marks, and explains their distinctive spatial patterns. Furthermore, the new model builds on the seminal work of Dżułyński and colleagues in the 1960s and 1970s, who identified that these structures contain key palaeocurrent information, and it is argued that such information is largely under‐utilized. Importantly, alongside their utility as palaeocurrent indicators, FIDS provide insights into the rheology of the substrate at the time of their formation, and thus the nature of basal flow conditions in the formative flows.