Jakob von Uexküll、异相学与行为系统 I:核心选集与梅洛-庞蒂

IF 2.1 3区 社会学 Q1 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Gordon M. Burghardt
{"title":"Jakob von Uexküll、异相学与行为系统 I:核心选集与梅洛-庞蒂","authors":"Gordon M. Burghardt","doi":"10.1007/s12304-024-09575-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Jakob von Uexküll developed his core ideas on Umwelt, inner world, counter world, and the functional circle over 100 years ago. While they influenced the early ethologists and phenomenologists, the full import of his ideas were either not recognized or were ignored for various reasons. In the case of ethology, proponents such as Nikolaas Tinbergen were under the sway of behaviorism and the denial that the experiential worlds of animals could be studied objectively with the tools of science. The role of salient sensory cues in serving as <i>signs</i> in the performance of instinctive behaviors and conditioning was accepted, and it is now evident that such studies actually provide a window to the ‘private experiences’ of other species. In this somewhat autobiographical paper I discuss how the early writings of Maurice Merleau-Ponty, prior to reading von Uexküll, compared to his views and those of contemporary ethologists and comparative psychologists. I conclude that all phenomenology is actually <i>heterophenomenology</i>, and that phenomenologists need to have more personal experience studying animal behavior and incorporate a <i>critical anthropomorphism</i> in resolving discrepancies and contradictions concerning the mental lives of species. This paper begins an attempt to use Umwelt theory and the functional circle as an effective scaffolding for integrating the behavioral sciences, including philosophy, across species. Interacting functional circles and Umwelten are essential for understanding social behavior. Interspecific animal play is introduced as a challenging and important topic for biosemioticians and phenomenologists to explore.</p>","PeriodicalId":49230,"journal":{"name":"Biosemiotics","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Jakob von Uexküll, Heterophenomenology, and Behavior Systems I: Core Ethology and Merleau-Ponty\",\"authors\":\"Gordon M. Burghardt\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12304-024-09575-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Jakob von Uexküll developed his core ideas on Umwelt, inner world, counter world, and the functional circle over 100 years ago. While they influenced the early ethologists and phenomenologists, the full import of his ideas were either not recognized or were ignored for various reasons. In the case of ethology, proponents such as Nikolaas Tinbergen were under the sway of behaviorism and the denial that the experiential worlds of animals could be studied objectively with the tools of science. The role of salient sensory cues in serving as <i>signs</i> in the performance of instinctive behaviors and conditioning was accepted, and it is now evident that such studies actually provide a window to the ‘private experiences’ of other species. In this somewhat autobiographical paper I discuss how the early writings of Maurice Merleau-Ponty, prior to reading von Uexküll, compared to his views and those of contemporary ethologists and comparative psychologists. I conclude that all phenomenology is actually <i>heterophenomenology</i>, and that phenomenologists need to have more personal experience studying animal behavior and incorporate a <i>critical anthropomorphism</i> in resolving discrepancies and contradictions concerning the mental lives of species. This paper begins an attempt to use Umwelt theory and the functional circle as an effective scaffolding for integrating the behavioral sciences, including philosophy, across species. Interacting functional circles and Umwelten are essential for understanding social behavior. Interspecific animal play is introduced as a challenging and important topic for biosemioticians and phenomenologists to explore.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49230,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biosemiotics\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biosemiotics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-024-09575-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biosemiotics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-024-09575-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

雅各布-冯-于克斯库尔早在 100 多年前就提出了关于 "Umwelt"、"内心世界"、"反世界 "和 "功能圈 "的核心思想。虽然这些思想影响了早期的伦理学家和现象学家,但由于种种原因,这些思想的全部内涵要么没有得到认可,要么被忽视了。就人种学而言,尼古拉斯-丁伯根(Nikolaas Tinbergen)等支持者受到行为主义的影响,否认可以用科学工具客观地研究动物的经验世界。突出的感觉线索在本能行为和条件反射中充当标志的作用已被接受,而现在显而易见的是,这类研究实际上为了解其他物种的 "私人经验 "提供了一个窗口。在这篇略带自传性质的论文中,我讨论了莫里斯-梅洛-庞蒂在阅读冯-于克斯库尔的著作之前的早期著作与他的观点以及当代伦理学家和比较心理学家的观点之间的比较。我的结论是,所有现象学实际上都是异现象学,现象学家需要有更多研究动物行为的个人经验,并在解决有关物种精神生活的差异和矛盾时纳入批判性拟人主义。本文开始尝试使用Umwelt理论和功能圈作为跨物种整合行为科学(包括哲学)的有效支架。相互作用的功能圈和 "Umwelten "对于理解社会行为至关重要。种间动物游戏是生物符号学家和现象学家需要探索的一个具有挑战性的重要课题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Jakob von Uexküll, Heterophenomenology, and Behavior Systems I: Core Ethology and Merleau-Ponty

Jakob von Uexküll, Heterophenomenology, and Behavior Systems I: Core Ethology and Merleau-Ponty

Jakob von Uexküll developed his core ideas on Umwelt, inner world, counter world, and the functional circle over 100 years ago. While they influenced the early ethologists and phenomenologists, the full import of his ideas were either not recognized or were ignored for various reasons. In the case of ethology, proponents such as Nikolaas Tinbergen were under the sway of behaviorism and the denial that the experiential worlds of animals could be studied objectively with the tools of science. The role of salient sensory cues in serving as signs in the performance of instinctive behaviors and conditioning was accepted, and it is now evident that such studies actually provide a window to the ‘private experiences’ of other species. In this somewhat autobiographical paper I discuss how the early writings of Maurice Merleau-Ponty, prior to reading von Uexküll, compared to his views and those of contemporary ethologists and comparative psychologists. I conclude that all phenomenology is actually heterophenomenology, and that phenomenologists need to have more personal experience studying animal behavior and incorporate a critical anthropomorphism in resolving discrepancies and contradictions concerning the mental lives of species. This paper begins an attempt to use Umwelt theory and the functional circle as an effective scaffolding for integrating the behavioral sciences, including philosophy, across species. Interacting functional circles and Umwelten are essential for understanding social behavior. Interspecific animal play is introduced as a challenging and important topic for biosemioticians and phenomenologists to explore.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biosemiotics
Biosemiotics HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
37.50%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biosemiotics is dedicated to building a bridge between biology, philosophy, linguistics, and the communication sciences. Biosemiotic research is concerned with the study of signs and meaning in living organisms and systems. Its main challenge is to naturalize biological meaning and information by building on the belief that signs are fundamental, constitutive components of the living world. Biosemiotics has triggered rethinking of fundamental assumptions in both biology and semiotics. In this view, biology should recognize the semiotic nature of life and reshape its theories and methodology accordingly while semiotics and the humanities should acknowledge the existence of signs beyond the human realm. Biosemiotics is at the cutting edge of research on the fundamentals of life. By challenging traditional assumptions on the nature of life and suggesting alternative perspectives, it opens up exciting new research paths.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信