评估紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa L.)和莎草(Onobrychis viciifolia Scop:多环境试验中的平均表现和稳定性

IF 1.5 4区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Plant Breeding Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1111/pbr.13194
Surendra Bhattarai, Hu Wang, Hari P. Poudel, Bill Biligetu
{"title":"评估紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa L.)和莎草(Onobrychis viciifolia Scop:多环境试验中的平均表现和稳定性","authors":"Surendra Bhattarai, Hu Wang, Hari P. Poudel, Bill Biligetu","doi":"10.1111/pbr.13194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Alfalfa (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"><jats:italic>Medicago sativa</jats:italic></jats:styled-content> L.) ‐ grass or alfalfa ‐ sainfoin (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"><jats:italic>Onobrychis viciifolia</jats:italic></jats:styled-content> Scop.) mixtures are commonly used for pastures in western Canada because of their high forage quality and their low risk of causing frothy bloat in grazing animals. However, the proportion of these two legumes declines in mixed forage stands over time. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of selecting superior genotypes from clonally propagated alfalfa or sainfoin under plant competition in different growth environments. For this study, around 100 genotypes of each legume were cloned and transplanted into meadow bromegrass (<jats:italic>Bromus riparius</jats:italic> Relm.) or alfalfa swards at Saskatoon, SK and Lethbridge, AB, Canada in 2017. Genotype‐environment (G x E) interactions of alfalfa and sainfoin genotypes were analysed by an additive main‐effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model. Significant variations in plant height, spring vigour and total dry matter yield (TDM) were observed for both species. Among the measured traits, plant height was a more highly heritable trait (H<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = .16 for alfalfa and H<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = .18 for sainfoin), while TDM was the least heritable (H<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = .08 for alfalfa and H<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = .04 for sainfoin). In the AMMI Analysis of variance for TDM, the genotype explained &lt;12% of the variation for both species, suggesting a direct selection of yield would result in a low genetic gain. The biplot mean performance (Y) x weighted average of absolute scores from the singular value decomposition of the matrix of BLUPs stability index (WAASB) identified several promising genotypes with superior performance and stability across different environments that were selected for producing synthetic lines. However, the synthetic lines of both alfalfa and sainfoin did not consistently exhibit superior performance in mixtures compared to their respective check cultivars.","PeriodicalId":20228,"journal":{"name":"Plant Breeding","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating effectiveness of clonal plant selection of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) in mixtures: Mean performance and stability in a multi‐environment trial\",\"authors\":\"Surendra Bhattarai, Hu Wang, Hari P. Poudel, Bill Biligetu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/pbr.13194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Alfalfa (<jats:styled-content style=\\\"fixed-case\\\"><jats:italic>Medicago sativa</jats:italic></jats:styled-content> L.) ‐ grass or alfalfa ‐ sainfoin (<jats:styled-content style=\\\"fixed-case\\\"><jats:italic>Onobrychis viciifolia</jats:italic></jats:styled-content> Scop.) mixtures are commonly used for pastures in western Canada because of their high forage quality and their low risk of causing frothy bloat in grazing animals. However, the proportion of these two legumes declines in mixed forage stands over time. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of selecting superior genotypes from clonally propagated alfalfa or sainfoin under plant competition in different growth environments. For this study, around 100 genotypes of each legume were cloned and transplanted into meadow bromegrass (<jats:italic>Bromus riparius</jats:italic> Relm.) or alfalfa swards at Saskatoon, SK and Lethbridge, AB, Canada in 2017. Genotype‐environment (G x E) interactions of alfalfa and sainfoin genotypes were analysed by an additive main‐effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model. Significant variations in plant height, spring vigour and total dry matter yield (TDM) were observed for both species. Among the measured traits, plant height was a more highly heritable trait (H<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = .16 for alfalfa and H<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = .18 for sainfoin), while TDM was the least heritable (H<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = .08 for alfalfa and H<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = .04 for sainfoin). In the AMMI Analysis of variance for TDM, the genotype explained &lt;12% of the variation for both species, suggesting a direct selection of yield would result in a low genetic gain. The biplot mean performance (Y) x weighted average of absolute scores from the singular value decomposition of the matrix of BLUPs stability index (WAASB) identified several promising genotypes with superior performance and stability across different environments that were selected for producing synthetic lines. However, the synthetic lines of both alfalfa and sainfoin did not consistently exhibit superior performance in mixtures compared to their respective check cultivars.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant Breeding\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant Breeding\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.13194\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Breeding","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.13194","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa L.)-青草或紫花苜蓿-莎草(Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.)然而,随着时间的推移,这两种豆科植物在混合牧草中的比例会下降。本研究的目的是评估在不同生长环境中植物竞争的情况下,从克隆繁殖的紫花苜蓿或紫花苜蓿中选择优良基因型的效果。在这项研究中,2017 年在加拿大萨斯卡通(Saskatoon, SK)和莱斯布里奇(Lethbridge, AB)克隆了每种豆科植物的约 100 个基因型,并将其移植到草地溴草(Bromus riparius Relm.)或紫花苜蓿草地中。通过加性主效应和乘性交互作用(AMMI)模型分析了紫花苜蓿和莎草基因型的基因型-环境(G x E)交互作用。两种植物的株高、春季活力和干物质总产量(TDM)均有显著差异。在测量的性状中,植株高度是遗传性较高的性状(紫花苜蓿的 H2 = .16,紫花苜蓿的 H2 = .18),而干物质总产量的遗传性最低(紫花苜蓿的 H2 = .08,紫花苜蓿的 H2 = .04)。在 TDM 的 AMMI 方差分析中,基因型解释了两个物种 12% 的变异,这表明直接选择产量会导致较低的遗传增益。双图平均性能(Y)×BLUPs 稳定性指数矩阵奇异值分解绝对得分的加权平均值(WAASB)确定了几个在不同环境下具有优异性能和稳定性的有前途的基因型,这些基因型被选育为合成品系。然而,与各自的对照栽培品种相比,紫花苜蓿和莎草的合成品系在混合物中并没有持续表现出优异的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating effectiveness of clonal plant selection of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) in mixtures: Mean performance and stability in a multi‐environment trial
Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) ‐ grass or alfalfa ‐ sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) mixtures are commonly used for pastures in western Canada because of their high forage quality and their low risk of causing frothy bloat in grazing animals. However, the proportion of these two legumes declines in mixed forage stands over time. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of selecting superior genotypes from clonally propagated alfalfa or sainfoin under plant competition in different growth environments. For this study, around 100 genotypes of each legume were cloned and transplanted into meadow bromegrass (Bromus riparius Relm.) or alfalfa swards at Saskatoon, SK and Lethbridge, AB, Canada in 2017. Genotype‐environment (G x E) interactions of alfalfa and sainfoin genotypes were analysed by an additive main‐effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model. Significant variations in plant height, spring vigour and total dry matter yield (TDM) were observed for both species. Among the measured traits, plant height was a more highly heritable trait (H2 = .16 for alfalfa and H2 = .18 for sainfoin), while TDM was the least heritable (H2 = .08 for alfalfa and H2 = .04 for sainfoin). In the AMMI Analysis of variance for TDM, the genotype explained <12% of the variation for both species, suggesting a direct selection of yield would result in a low genetic gain. The biplot mean performance (Y) x weighted average of absolute scores from the singular value decomposition of the matrix of BLUPs stability index (WAASB) identified several promising genotypes with superior performance and stability across different environments that were selected for producing synthetic lines. However, the synthetic lines of both alfalfa and sainfoin did not consistently exhibit superior performance in mixtures compared to their respective check cultivars.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plant Breeding
Plant Breeding 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: PLANT BREEDING publishes full-length original manuscripts and review articles on all aspects of plant improvement, breeding methodologies, and genetics to include qualitative and quantitative inheritance and genomics of major crop species. PLANT BREEDING provides readers with cutting-edge information on use of molecular techniques and genomics as they relate to improving gain from selection. Since its subject matter embraces all aspects of crop improvement, its content is sought after by both industry and academia. Fields of interest: Genetics of cultivated plants as well as research in practical plant breeding.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信