Linnea Garlepow, Nina Funke, Barbara Ann Güldenring
{"title":"以多因素方法研究南亚英语中的战争和腐败隐喻","authors":"Linnea Garlepow, Nina Funke, Barbara Ann Güldenring","doi":"10.1111/weng.12703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present paper provides a corpus‐based study of <jats:sc>war</jats:sc> and <jats:sc>corruption</jats:sc> metaphors in South Asian Englishes (specifically Indian English, Bangladeshi English, Nepali English and Pakistani English). Considering the highly news‐relevant nature of these concepts, the South Asian Varieties of English corpus (SAVE2020) serves as the database. In an initial step, we outline the source domains at different levels of schematicity used to construe <jats:sc>war</jats:sc> and <jats:sc>corruption</jats:sc>, revealing the salient domains <jats:sc>at location</jats:sc> and <jats:sc>person</jats:sc>. By pursuing a multifactorial approach, this study aims at answering the question whether the choice of source domain is governed by the sociolinguistic factors <jats:sc>gender</jats:sc> and <jats:sc>variety</jats:sc>, and intra‐linguistic factors, for example, length and semantic prosody of the metaphor‐related words. It furthermore investigates whether multifactorial analyses, which are still a novelty within research on metaphor variation, constitute a suitable methodological approach. By doing so, our research demonstrates the need to complement this quantitative approach with a qualitative one that offers a more fine‐grained description of the source domains used to structure metaphorical concepts like <jats:sc>war</jats:sc> and <jats:sc>corruption</jats:sc>.","PeriodicalId":23780,"journal":{"name":"World Englishes","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A multifactorial approach to war and corruption metaphors in South Asian Englishes\",\"authors\":\"Linnea Garlepow, Nina Funke, Barbara Ann Güldenring\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/weng.12703\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present paper provides a corpus‐based study of <jats:sc>war</jats:sc> and <jats:sc>corruption</jats:sc> metaphors in South Asian Englishes (specifically Indian English, Bangladeshi English, Nepali English and Pakistani English). Considering the highly news‐relevant nature of these concepts, the South Asian Varieties of English corpus (SAVE2020) serves as the database. In an initial step, we outline the source domains at different levels of schematicity used to construe <jats:sc>war</jats:sc> and <jats:sc>corruption</jats:sc>, revealing the salient domains <jats:sc>at location</jats:sc> and <jats:sc>person</jats:sc>. By pursuing a multifactorial approach, this study aims at answering the question whether the choice of source domain is governed by the sociolinguistic factors <jats:sc>gender</jats:sc> and <jats:sc>variety</jats:sc>, and intra‐linguistic factors, for example, length and semantic prosody of the metaphor‐related words. It furthermore investigates whether multifactorial analyses, which are still a novelty within research on metaphor variation, constitute a suitable methodological approach. By doing so, our research demonstrates the need to complement this quantitative approach with a qualitative one that offers a more fine‐grained description of the source domains used to structure metaphorical concepts like <jats:sc>war</jats:sc> and <jats:sc>corruption</jats:sc>.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23780,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Englishes\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Englishes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12703\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Englishes","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12703","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
A multifactorial approach to war and corruption metaphors in South Asian Englishes
The present paper provides a corpus‐based study of war and corruption metaphors in South Asian Englishes (specifically Indian English, Bangladeshi English, Nepali English and Pakistani English). Considering the highly news‐relevant nature of these concepts, the South Asian Varieties of English corpus (SAVE2020) serves as the database. In an initial step, we outline the source domains at different levels of schematicity used to construe war and corruption, revealing the salient domains at location and person. By pursuing a multifactorial approach, this study aims at answering the question whether the choice of source domain is governed by the sociolinguistic factors gender and variety, and intra‐linguistic factors, for example, length and semantic prosody of the metaphor‐related words. It furthermore investigates whether multifactorial analyses, which are still a novelty within research on metaphor variation, constitute a suitable methodological approach. By doing so, our research demonstrates the need to complement this quantitative approach with a qualitative one that offers a more fine‐grained description of the source domains used to structure metaphorical concepts like war and corruption.
期刊介绍:
World Englishes is integrative in its scope and includes theoretical and applied studies on language, literature and English teaching, with emphasis on cross-cultural perspectives and identities. The journal provides recent research, critical and evaluative papers, and reviews from Africa, Asia, Europe, Oceania and the Americas. Thematic special issues and colloquia appear regularly. Special sections such as ''Comments / Replies'' and ''Forum'' promote open discussions and debate.