Intelligo ut Confido:可验证无收据电子投票中的理解、信任和用户体验(长篇)

Marie-Laure Zollinger, Peter B. Rønne, Steve Schneider, Peter Y. A. Ryan, Wojtek Jamroga
{"title":"Intelligo ut Confido:可验证无收据电子投票中的理解、信任和用户体验(长篇)","authors":"Marie-Laure Zollinger, Peter B. Rønne, Steve Schneider, Peter Y. A. Ryan, Wojtek Jamroga","doi":"arxiv-2407.13240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Voting protocols seek to provide integrity and vote privacy in elections. To\nachieve integrity, procedures have been proposed allowing voters to verify\ntheir vote - however this impacts both the user experience and privacy.\nEspecially, vote verification can lead to vote-buying or coercion, if an\nattacker can obtain documentation, i.e. a receipt, of the cast vote. Thus, some\nvoting protocols go further and provide mechanisms to prevent such receipts. To\nbe effective, this so-called receipt-freeness depends on voters being able to\nunderstand and use these mechanisms. In this paper, we present a study with 300\nparticipants which aims to evaluate the voters' experience of the\nreceipt-freeness procedures in the e-voting protocol Selene in the context of\nvote-buying. This actually constitutes the first user study dealing with\nvote-buying in e-voting. While the usability and trust factors were rated low\nin the experiments, we found a positive correlation between trust and\nunderstanding.","PeriodicalId":501541,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Human-Computer Interaction","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intelligo ut Confido: Understanding, Trust and User Experience in Verifiable Receipt-Free E-Voting (long version)\",\"authors\":\"Marie-Laure Zollinger, Peter B. Rønne, Steve Schneider, Peter Y. A. Ryan, Wojtek Jamroga\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2407.13240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Voting protocols seek to provide integrity and vote privacy in elections. To\\nachieve integrity, procedures have been proposed allowing voters to verify\\ntheir vote - however this impacts both the user experience and privacy.\\nEspecially, vote verification can lead to vote-buying or coercion, if an\\nattacker can obtain documentation, i.e. a receipt, of the cast vote. Thus, some\\nvoting protocols go further and provide mechanisms to prevent such receipts. To\\nbe effective, this so-called receipt-freeness depends on voters being able to\\nunderstand and use these mechanisms. In this paper, we present a study with 300\\nparticipants which aims to evaluate the voters' experience of the\\nreceipt-freeness procedures in the e-voting protocol Selene in the context of\\nvote-buying. This actually constitutes the first user study dealing with\\nvote-buying in e-voting. While the usability and trust factors were rated low\\nin the experiments, we found a positive correlation between trust and\\nunderstanding.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Human-Computer Interaction\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Human-Computer Interaction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.13240\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Human-Computer Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.13240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

投票协议旨在为选举提供完整性和投票隐私。特别是,如果攻击者能够获得投票的文件(即收据),投票验证可能会导致贿选或胁迫。因此,一些投票协议更进一步,提供了防止此类收据的机制。这种所谓的 "无收据 "机制是否有效,取决于投票者是否能够理解并使用这些机制。在本文中,我们介绍了一项有 300 名参与者参与的研究,旨在评估投票人在购买选票的情况下对电子投票协议 Selene 中的无收据程序的体验。这实际上是首次针对电子投票中的买票行为进行的用户研究。虽然可用性和信任因素在实验中评分较低,但我们发现信任和理解之间存在正相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intelligo ut Confido: Understanding, Trust and User Experience in Verifiable Receipt-Free E-Voting (long version)
Voting protocols seek to provide integrity and vote privacy in elections. To achieve integrity, procedures have been proposed allowing voters to verify their vote - however this impacts both the user experience and privacy. Especially, vote verification can lead to vote-buying or coercion, if an attacker can obtain documentation, i.e. a receipt, of the cast vote. Thus, some voting protocols go further and provide mechanisms to prevent such receipts. To be effective, this so-called receipt-freeness depends on voters being able to understand and use these mechanisms. In this paper, we present a study with 300 participants which aims to evaluate the voters' experience of the receipt-freeness procedures in the e-voting protocol Selene in the context of vote-buying. This actually constitutes the first user study dealing with vote-buying in e-voting. While the usability and trust factors were rated low in the experiments, we found a positive correlation between trust and understanding.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信