分次施用除草剂的策略可减少地表径流

IF 5 3区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Shane Scannell, Mark G. Healy, Gustavo Sambrano, John McGinley, Paraic C. Ryan, Per‐Erik Mellander, Liam Morrison, Jenny Harmon O’Driscoll, Alma Siggins
{"title":"分次施用除草剂的策略可减少地表径流","authors":"Shane Scannell, Mark G. Healy, Gustavo Sambrano, John McGinley, Paraic C. Ryan, Per‐Erik Mellander, Liam Morrison, Jenny Harmon O’Driscoll, Alma Siggins","doi":"10.1111/sum.13086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Herbicides, such as MCPA and clopyralid, may be transported to surface waters via runoff, which can have unintended environmental consequences. A split herbicide application strategy, wherein applications are spread across a season, may improve herbicide effectiveness, although impacts of this strategy on runoff mitigation have not been investigated. Therefore, this study aimed to (1) quantify the impact of split‐dose applications of MCPA and clopyralid on herbicide losses in surface runoff and (2) assess the impact of split‐dose applications of MCPA on the quantity and classification of MCPA‐degrading soil bacteria. Intact grassed soil sods were placed in 1 m‐long × 0.25 m‐wide × 0.1 m‐deep laboratory flumes, onto which either MCPA or clopyralid were applied in one full‐dose (13.5 kg MCPA ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>; 2 kg clopyralid ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>) or two split‐doses (each 6.75 kg MCPA ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>; 1 kg clopyralid ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>) 42 days apart. On days 2, 7 and 21 following herbicide applications, flumes were subjected to controlled rainfall simulations at an intensity of 11 mm h<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>, and the herbicides in the runoff were quantified. MCPA and clopyralid concentrations in the runoff were highest immediately after the initial application. Both herbicides were below the limit of detection (0.1 μg l<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> for MCPA and 0.45 μg l<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> for clopyralid) by 44 days. No herbicides were detected in the runoff following the second split‐dose application. For MCPA, this was attributed to an adaptation in the microbial community with the emergence of bacteria possessing the <jats:italic>tfdA</jats:italic> class III gene in the soil. These results support split‐dose herbicide application as a strategy for agricultural management.","PeriodicalId":21759,"journal":{"name":"Soil Use and Management","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A split herbicide application strategy reduces surface runoff\",\"authors\":\"Shane Scannell, Mark G. Healy, Gustavo Sambrano, John McGinley, Paraic C. Ryan, Per‐Erik Mellander, Liam Morrison, Jenny Harmon O’Driscoll, Alma Siggins\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/sum.13086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Herbicides, such as MCPA and clopyralid, may be transported to surface waters via runoff, which can have unintended environmental consequences. A split herbicide application strategy, wherein applications are spread across a season, may improve herbicide effectiveness, although impacts of this strategy on runoff mitigation have not been investigated. Therefore, this study aimed to (1) quantify the impact of split‐dose applications of MCPA and clopyralid on herbicide losses in surface runoff and (2) assess the impact of split‐dose applications of MCPA on the quantity and classification of MCPA‐degrading soil bacteria. Intact grassed soil sods were placed in 1 m‐long × 0.25 m‐wide × 0.1 m‐deep laboratory flumes, onto which either MCPA or clopyralid were applied in one full‐dose (13.5 kg MCPA ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>; 2 kg clopyralid ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>) or two split‐doses (each 6.75 kg MCPA ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>; 1 kg clopyralid ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>) 42 days apart. On days 2, 7 and 21 following herbicide applications, flumes were subjected to controlled rainfall simulations at an intensity of 11 mm h<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>, and the herbicides in the runoff were quantified. MCPA and clopyralid concentrations in the runoff were highest immediately after the initial application. Both herbicides were below the limit of detection (0.1 μg l<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> for MCPA and 0.45 μg l<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> for clopyralid) by 44 days. No herbicides were detected in the runoff following the second split‐dose application. For MCPA, this was attributed to an adaptation in the microbial community with the emergence of bacteria possessing the <jats:italic>tfdA</jats:italic> class III gene in the soil. These results support split‐dose herbicide application as a strategy for agricultural management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil Use and Management\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil Use and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.13086\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Use and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.13086","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

MCPA 和氯吡脲等除草剂可能会通过径流进入地表水体,从而对环境造成意想不到的影响。分季施用除草剂的策略可提高除草剂的效果,但这种策略对径流减缓的影响尚未得到研究。因此,本研究旨在:(1)量化分剂量施用 MCPA 和氯吡脲对地表径流中除草剂损失的影响;(2)评估分剂量施用 MCPA 对 MCPA 降解土壤细菌的数量和分类的影响。将完整的草炭土置于长 1 米×宽 0.25 米×深 0.1 米的实验室水槽中,在水槽中施用一次全剂量(每公顷 13.5 千克 MCPA;每公顷 2 千克 clopyralid)或两次分剂量(每公顷 6.75 千克 MCPA;每公顷 1 千克 clopyralid)的 MCPA 或 clopyralid,间隔时间为 42 天。在施用除草剂后的第 2、7 和 21 天,对水槽进行强度为 11 毫米/小时的受控降雨模拟,并对径流中的除草剂进行定量。首次施药后,径流中的 MCPA 和 clopyralid 浓度最高。44 天后,这两种除草剂的浓度均低于检测限(MCPA 为 0.1 μg l-1,氯吡脲为 0.45 μg l-1)。第二次分剂量施药后,径流中未检测到除草剂。就 MCPA 而言,这是由于土壤中出现了拥有 tfdA III 类基因的细菌,从而使微生物群落发生了适应性变化。这些结果支持将分次施用除草剂作为一种农业管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A split herbicide application strategy reduces surface runoff
Herbicides, such as MCPA and clopyralid, may be transported to surface waters via runoff, which can have unintended environmental consequences. A split herbicide application strategy, wherein applications are spread across a season, may improve herbicide effectiveness, although impacts of this strategy on runoff mitigation have not been investigated. Therefore, this study aimed to (1) quantify the impact of split‐dose applications of MCPA and clopyralid on herbicide losses in surface runoff and (2) assess the impact of split‐dose applications of MCPA on the quantity and classification of MCPA‐degrading soil bacteria. Intact grassed soil sods were placed in 1 m‐long × 0.25 m‐wide × 0.1 m‐deep laboratory flumes, onto which either MCPA or clopyralid were applied in one full‐dose (13.5 kg MCPA ha−1; 2 kg clopyralid ha−1) or two split‐doses (each 6.75 kg MCPA ha−1; 1 kg clopyralid ha−1) 42 days apart. On days 2, 7 and 21 following herbicide applications, flumes were subjected to controlled rainfall simulations at an intensity of 11 mm h−1, and the herbicides in the runoff were quantified. MCPA and clopyralid concentrations in the runoff were highest immediately after the initial application. Both herbicides were below the limit of detection (0.1 μg l−1 for MCPA and 0.45 μg l−1 for clopyralid) by 44 days. No herbicides were detected in the runoff following the second split‐dose application. For MCPA, this was attributed to an adaptation in the microbial community with the emergence of bacteria possessing the tfdA class III gene in the soil. These results support split‐dose herbicide application as a strategy for agricultural management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Use and Management
Soil Use and Management 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
13.20%
发文量
78
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Soil Use and Management publishes in soil science, earth and environmental science, agricultural science, and engineering fields. The submitted papers should consider the underlying mechanisms governing the natural and anthropogenic processes which affect soil systems, and should inform policy makers and/or practitioners on the sustainable use and management of soil resources. Interdisciplinary studies, e.g. linking soil with climate change, biodiversity, global health, and the UN’s sustainable development goals, with strong novelty, wide implications, and unexpected outcomes are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信