德尔菲研究:在提供定制轮廓座椅时应向肢体残疾成人的照顾者提供的定位信息。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Ruth Hanley, Johnny Collett
{"title":"德尔菲研究:在提供定制轮廓座椅时应向肢体残疾成人的照顾者提供的定位信息。","authors":"Ruth Hanley, Johnny Collett","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2024.2382287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This research aims to identify information that is important to provide on supply of custom-contoured seating. The way this information would be best communicated is also of interest. A two-round e-Delphi study was utilised to explore consensus. A panel of stakeholders from Ireland including experts in positioning clients in custom-contoured seating and caregivers were recruited. The first round consisted of open-ended questions and was analysed using thematic analysis. The second round employed a rating technique and 7-point Likert scale. Consensus was set a priori at 70% agreement. The way information should be communicated and by whom was rated in order of preference.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifteen participants were recruited, nine clinicians and four caregivers. Fifty-two statements under six themes (transfers = 10, positioning = 22, pressure care = 4, general use = 4, post-supply follow-up = 8, functional activity = 4) were generated in round 1 by 13/15 participants. Round 2 was completed by 10/15. 49/52 statements reached consensus and were deemed important. The ways information should be communicated and by whom was identified. Caregivers want individualised information whereas clinicians preferred a more generic approach.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusions: </strong>There was a high degree of consensus on what information is required to support caregivers. The topics demonstrate the extensive information that should be provided. The preferred delivery method for primary caregivers was hands-on training with the opportunity to practice and take videos. Stakeholders differed in how they would prefer information delivered. Further research should evaluate the method of delivering training and its effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The positioning information that should be provided to caregivers of adults with a physical disability on supply of custom-contoured seating, a Delphi study.\",\"authors\":\"Ruth Hanley, Johnny Collett\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17483107.2024.2382287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This research aims to identify information that is important to provide on supply of custom-contoured seating. The way this information would be best communicated is also of interest. A two-round e-Delphi study was utilised to explore consensus. A panel of stakeholders from Ireland including experts in positioning clients in custom-contoured seating and caregivers were recruited. The first round consisted of open-ended questions and was analysed using thematic analysis. The second round employed a rating technique and 7-point Likert scale. Consensus was set a priori at 70% agreement. The way information should be communicated and by whom was rated in order of preference.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifteen participants were recruited, nine clinicians and four caregivers. Fifty-two statements under six themes (transfers = 10, positioning = 22, pressure care = 4, general use = 4, post-supply follow-up = 8, functional activity = 4) were generated in round 1 by 13/15 participants. Round 2 was completed by 10/15. 49/52 statements reached consensus and were deemed important. The ways information should be communicated and by whom was identified. Caregivers want individualised information whereas clinicians preferred a more generic approach.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusions: </strong>There was a high degree of consensus on what information is required to support caregivers. The topics demonstrate the extensive information that should be provided. The preferred delivery method for primary caregivers was hands-on training with the opportunity to practice and take videos. Stakeholders differed in how they would prefer information delivered. Further research should evaluate the method of delivering training and its effectiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2024.2382287\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2024.2382287","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在确定提供定制化座椅的重要信息。这些信息的最佳传播方式也值得关注。我们采用了两轮电子德尔菲研究来探索共识。研究人员招募了来自爱尔兰的利益相关者,包括定制轮廓座椅客户定位专家和护理人员。第一轮由开放式问题组成,并采用主题分析法进行分析。第二轮采用评分技术和 7 点李克特量表。事先将共识设定为 70%。信息交流的方式和交流对象按优先顺序排列:共招募了 15 名参与者,其中包括 9 名临床医生和 4 名护理人员。在第一轮中,13/15 名参与者根据六个主题(转移 = 10、定位 = 22、压力护理 = 4、一般使用 = 4、供应后随访 = 8、功能活动 = 4)提出了 52 项陈述。第二轮由 10/15 位参与者完成。49/52 项声明达成了共识,并被视为重要声明。确定了信息的传播方式和传播对象。护理人员希望获得个性化的信息,而临床医生则倾向于采用更通用的方式:结果和结论:对于需要哪些信息来支持护理人员,各方达成了高度共识。这些主题显示了应提供的广泛信息。对于初级护理人员来说,首选的培训方式是实践培训,并提供练习和拍摄视频的机会。利益相关者对提供信息的方式各不相同。进一步的研究应评估提供培训的方法及其有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The positioning information that should be provided to caregivers of adults with a physical disability on supply of custom-contoured seating, a Delphi study.

Purpose: This research aims to identify information that is important to provide on supply of custom-contoured seating. The way this information would be best communicated is also of interest. A two-round e-Delphi study was utilised to explore consensus. A panel of stakeholders from Ireland including experts in positioning clients in custom-contoured seating and caregivers were recruited. The first round consisted of open-ended questions and was analysed using thematic analysis. The second round employed a rating technique and 7-point Likert scale. Consensus was set a priori at 70% agreement. The way information should be communicated and by whom was rated in order of preference.

Materials and methods: Fifteen participants were recruited, nine clinicians and four caregivers. Fifty-two statements under six themes (transfers = 10, positioning = 22, pressure care = 4, general use = 4, post-supply follow-up = 8, functional activity = 4) were generated in round 1 by 13/15 participants. Round 2 was completed by 10/15. 49/52 statements reached consensus and were deemed important. The ways information should be communicated and by whom was identified. Caregivers want individualised information whereas clinicians preferred a more generic approach.

Results and conclusions: There was a high degree of consensus on what information is required to support caregivers. The topics demonstrate the extensive information that should be provided. The preferred delivery method for primary caregivers was hands-on training with the opportunity to practice and take videos. Stakeholders differed in how they would prefer information delivered. Further research should evaluate the method of delivering training and its effectiveness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信