Martin Schevik Lindberg, Martin Brattmyr, Jakob Lundqvist, Stian Solem, Odin Hjemdal, Eirik Roos, Ane Bjøru Fjeldsæter, Thröstur Björgvinsson, Peter Cornish, Audun Havnen
{"title":"挪威为精神疾病患者提供的阶梯式护理模式是否达到预期效果?一项横断面研究。","authors":"Martin Schevik Lindberg, Martin Brattmyr, Jakob Lundqvist, Stian Solem, Odin Hjemdal, Eirik Roos, Ane Bjøru Fjeldsæter, Thröstur Björgvinsson, Peter Cornish, Audun Havnen","doi":"10.1080/10503307.2024.2378017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Stepped care models are frameworks for mental health care systems in several countries. According to Norwegian guidelines, individuals with mental health problems of mild severity should be treated in community mental health services, moderate severity in specialist mental health services, while complex/severe problems are often a shared responsibility. This study investigated whether patients are allocated as intended.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a cross-sectional study, 4061 outpatients recruited from community- and specialist mental health services reported demographic variables, symptoms of anxiety/depression, functional impairment, health status, and sick leave status. The community sample consisted of two subsamples: mild/moderate problems and complex problems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was substantial overlap (80%-99%) of symptoms, impairment, and health between community- and specialist mental health services. More impairment, worse health, lower age, and being male were associated with treatment at specialist level compared to community mild/moderate. Better health, being in a relationship, and lower age were associated with specialized treatment compared to community complex group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The limited association between treatment level and symptoms and functional impairment reveals inconsistencies between treatment guidelines and clinical practice. How the existing organization affects patient outcomes and satisfaction should be investigated further.</p>","PeriodicalId":48159,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is the Norwegian stepped care model for allocation of patients with mental health problems working as intended? A cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Martin Schevik Lindberg, Martin Brattmyr, Jakob Lundqvist, Stian Solem, Odin Hjemdal, Eirik Roos, Ane Bjøru Fjeldsæter, Thröstur Björgvinsson, Peter Cornish, Audun Havnen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10503307.2024.2378017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Stepped care models are frameworks for mental health care systems in several countries. According to Norwegian guidelines, individuals with mental health problems of mild severity should be treated in community mental health services, moderate severity in specialist mental health services, while complex/severe problems are often a shared responsibility. This study investigated whether patients are allocated as intended.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a cross-sectional study, 4061 outpatients recruited from community- and specialist mental health services reported demographic variables, symptoms of anxiety/depression, functional impairment, health status, and sick leave status. The community sample consisted of two subsamples: mild/moderate problems and complex problems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was substantial overlap (80%-99%) of symptoms, impairment, and health between community- and specialist mental health services. More impairment, worse health, lower age, and being male were associated with treatment at specialist level compared to community mild/moderate. Better health, being in a relationship, and lower age were associated with specialized treatment compared to community complex group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The limited association between treatment level and symptoms and functional impairment reveals inconsistencies between treatment guidelines and clinical practice. How the existing organization affects patient outcomes and satisfaction should be investigated further.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychotherapy Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychotherapy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2024.2378017\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2024.2378017","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Is the Norwegian stepped care model for allocation of patients with mental health problems working as intended? A cross-sectional study.
Objective: Stepped care models are frameworks for mental health care systems in several countries. According to Norwegian guidelines, individuals with mental health problems of mild severity should be treated in community mental health services, moderate severity in specialist mental health services, while complex/severe problems are often a shared responsibility. This study investigated whether patients are allocated as intended.
Methods: In a cross-sectional study, 4061 outpatients recruited from community- and specialist mental health services reported demographic variables, symptoms of anxiety/depression, functional impairment, health status, and sick leave status. The community sample consisted of two subsamples: mild/moderate problems and complex problems.
Results: There was substantial overlap (80%-99%) of symptoms, impairment, and health between community- and specialist mental health services. More impairment, worse health, lower age, and being male were associated with treatment at specialist level compared to community mild/moderate. Better health, being in a relationship, and lower age were associated with specialized treatment compared to community complex group.
Conclusion: The limited association between treatment level and symptoms and functional impairment reveals inconsistencies between treatment guidelines and clinical practice. How the existing organization affects patient outcomes and satisfaction should be investigated further.
期刊介绍:
Psychotherapy Research seeks to enhance the development, scientific quality, and social relevance of psychotherapy research and to foster the use of research findings in practice, education, and policy formulation. The Journal publishes reports of original research on all aspects of psychotherapy, including its outcomes, its processes, education of practitioners, and delivery of services. It also publishes methodological, theoretical, and review articles of direct relevance to psychotherapy research. The Journal is addressed to an international, interdisciplinary audience and welcomes submissions dealing with diverse theoretical orientations, treatment modalities.