Syama Gollapalli, Vidushi Sharma, Adel Al Ghazwi, Leonie Heskin
{"title":"手术中的智能眼镜:手术室及其他","authors":"Syama Gollapalli, Vidushi Sharma, Adel Al Ghazwi, Leonie Heskin","doi":"10.1177/15533506241265274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims & objectives: </strong>The primary aim of this paper is to determine whether smart glasses or head-mounted displays improve efficiency in a procedural or theatre setting without compromising the quality of the procedure performed. Additionally, this paper aims to qualitatively explore applications in surgical education, whilst on-call, consulting and patient observation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This paper is a systematic review of the literature available on the topic of smart glasses or head-mounted displays in surgical or procedural settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search of Pubmed, Cochrane and the Wiley Online Library was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Procedural times and adverse outcomes were compared between the smart glass and non-smart glass groups in each of the quantitative studies. A literature review of studies, including those not satisfying the primary aim was conducted and is included in this paper.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>32 studies were identified that complied with the inclusion criteria of this paper. 8 of these studies focused on procedural times and adverse outcomes, with and without smart glass usage. Procedural time was reduced when smart glass technology was used, without an increase in adverse patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgeons should consider whether the relatively short reduction in procedural time is worth the high cost, privacy issues, battery complaints and user discomfort involved with these devices. There are promising applications of this technology in the areas of surgical education and consultation. However, more trials are necessary to assess the value of using smart glasses in these settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Smart Glasses in Surgery: The Theatre and Beyond.\",\"authors\":\"Syama Gollapalli, Vidushi Sharma, Adel Al Ghazwi, Leonie Heskin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15533506241265274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims & objectives: </strong>The primary aim of this paper is to determine whether smart glasses or head-mounted displays improve efficiency in a procedural or theatre setting without compromising the quality of the procedure performed. Additionally, this paper aims to qualitatively explore applications in surgical education, whilst on-call, consulting and patient observation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This paper is a systematic review of the literature available on the topic of smart glasses or head-mounted displays in surgical or procedural settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search of Pubmed, Cochrane and the Wiley Online Library was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Procedural times and adverse outcomes were compared between the smart glass and non-smart glass groups in each of the quantitative studies. A literature review of studies, including those not satisfying the primary aim was conducted and is included in this paper.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>32 studies were identified that complied with the inclusion criteria of this paper. 8 of these studies focused on procedural times and adverse outcomes, with and without smart glass usage. Procedural time was reduced when smart glass technology was used, without an increase in adverse patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgeons should consider whether the relatively short reduction in procedural time is worth the high cost, privacy issues, battery complaints and user discomfort involved with these devices. There are promising applications of this technology in the areas of surgical education and consultation. However, more trials are necessary to assess the value of using smart glasses in these settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Innovation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506241265274\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506241265274","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Aims & objectives: The primary aim of this paper is to determine whether smart glasses or head-mounted displays improve efficiency in a procedural or theatre setting without compromising the quality of the procedure performed. Additionally, this paper aims to qualitatively explore applications in surgical education, whilst on-call, consulting and patient observation.
Design: This paper is a systematic review of the literature available on the topic of smart glasses or head-mounted displays in surgical or procedural settings.
Methods: A search of Pubmed, Cochrane and the Wiley Online Library was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Procedural times and adverse outcomes were compared between the smart glass and non-smart glass groups in each of the quantitative studies. A literature review of studies, including those not satisfying the primary aim was conducted and is included in this paper.
Results: 32 studies were identified that complied with the inclusion criteria of this paper. 8 of these studies focused on procedural times and adverse outcomes, with and without smart glass usage. Procedural time was reduced when smart glass technology was used, without an increase in adverse patient outcomes.
Conclusions: Surgeons should consider whether the relatively short reduction in procedural time is worth the high cost, privacy issues, battery complaints and user discomfort involved with these devices. There are promising applications of this technology in the areas of surgical education and consultation. However, more trials are necessary to assess the value of using smart glasses in these settings.
期刊介绍:
Surgical Innovation (SRI) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal focusing on minimally invasive surgical techniques, new instruments such as laparoscopes and endoscopes, and new technologies. SRI prepares surgeons to think and work in "the operating room of the future" through learning new techniques, understanding and adapting to new technologies, maintaining surgical competencies, and applying surgical outcomes data to their practices. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).