手术中的智能眼镜:手术室及其他

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Surgical Innovation Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-21 DOI:10.1177/15533506241265274
Syama Gollapalli, Vidushi Sharma, Adel Al Ghazwi, Leonie Heskin
{"title":"手术中的智能眼镜:手术室及其他","authors":"Syama Gollapalli, Vidushi Sharma, Adel Al Ghazwi, Leonie Heskin","doi":"10.1177/15533506241265274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims & objectives: </strong>The primary aim of this paper is to determine whether smart glasses or head-mounted displays improve efficiency in a procedural or theatre setting without compromising the quality of the procedure performed. Additionally, this paper aims to qualitatively explore applications in surgical education, whilst on-call, consulting and patient observation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This paper is a systematic review of the literature available on the topic of smart glasses or head-mounted displays in surgical or procedural settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search of Pubmed, Cochrane and the Wiley Online Library was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Procedural times and adverse outcomes were compared between the smart glass and non-smart glass groups in each of the quantitative studies. A literature review of studies, including those not satisfying the primary aim was conducted and is included in this paper.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>32 studies were identified that complied with the inclusion criteria of this paper. 8 of these studies focused on procedural times and adverse outcomes, with and without smart glass usage. Procedural time was reduced when smart glass technology was used, without an increase in adverse patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgeons should consider whether the relatively short reduction in procedural time is worth the high cost, privacy issues, battery complaints and user discomfort involved with these devices. There are promising applications of this technology in the areas of surgical education and consultation. However, more trials are necessary to assess the value of using smart glasses in these settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Smart Glasses in Surgery: The Theatre and Beyond.\",\"authors\":\"Syama Gollapalli, Vidushi Sharma, Adel Al Ghazwi, Leonie Heskin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15533506241265274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims & objectives: </strong>The primary aim of this paper is to determine whether smart glasses or head-mounted displays improve efficiency in a procedural or theatre setting without compromising the quality of the procedure performed. Additionally, this paper aims to qualitatively explore applications in surgical education, whilst on-call, consulting and patient observation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This paper is a systematic review of the literature available on the topic of smart glasses or head-mounted displays in surgical or procedural settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search of Pubmed, Cochrane and the Wiley Online Library was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Procedural times and adverse outcomes were compared between the smart glass and non-smart glass groups in each of the quantitative studies. A literature review of studies, including those not satisfying the primary aim was conducted and is included in this paper.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>32 studies were identified that complied with the inclusion criteria of this paper. 8 of these studies focused on procedural times and adverse outcomes, with and without smart glass usage. Procedural time was reduced when smart glass technology was used, without an increase in adverse patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgeons should consider whether the relatively short reduction in procedural time is worth the high cost, privacy issues, battery complaints and user discomfort involved with these devices. There are promising applications of this technology in the areas of surgical education and consultation. However, more trials are necessary to assess the value of using smart glasses in these settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Innovation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506241265274\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506241265274","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的与目标:本文的主要目的是确定智能眼镜或头戴式显示器是否能在不影响手术质量的前提下提高手术或手术室环境的效率。此外,本文还旨在定性地探讨智能眼镜在外科教育、值班、咨询和病人观察中的应用:本文是对智能眼镜或头戴式显示器在外科或手术环境中的应用相关文献的系统性综述:方法:根据PRISMA指南,对Pubmed、Cochrane和Wiley在线图书馆进行了检索。在每项定量研究中,比较了智能玻璃组和非智能玻璃组的手术时间和不良后果。本文还对各项研究进行了文献综述,包括那些不符合主要目的的研究:结果:共发现 32 项研究符合本文的纳入标准。其中 8 项研究重点关注了使用和不使用智能玻璃的手术时间和不良后果。使用智能玻璃技术后,手术时间缩短了,但患者的不良后果没有增加:外科医生应该考虑,相对较短的手术时间减少是否值得这些设备的高成本、隐私问题、电池投诉和用户不适。这项技术在外科教育和咨询领域的应用前景广阔。不过,有必要进行更多试验,以评估在这些场合使用智能眼镜的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Smart Glasses in Surgery: The Theatre and Beyond.

Aims & objectives: The primary aim of this paper is to determine whether smart glasses or head-mounted displays improve efficiency in a procedural or theatre setting without compromising the quality of the procedure performed. Additionally, this paper aims to qualitatively explore applications in surgical education, whilst on-call, consulting and patient observation.

Design: This paper is a systematic review of the literature available on the topic of smart glasses or head-mounted displays in surgical or procedural settings.

Methods: A search of Pubmed, Cochrane and the Wiley Online Library was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Procedural times and adverse outcomes were compared between the smart glass and non-smart glass groups in each of the quantitative studies. A literature review of studies, including those not satisfying the primary aim was conducted and is included in this paper.

Results: 32 studies were identified that complied with the inclusion criteria of this paper. 8 of these studies focused on procedural times and adverse outcomes, with and without smart glass usage. Procedural time was reduced when smart glass technology was used, without an increase in adverse patient outcomes.

Conclusions: Surgeons should consider whether the relatively short reduction in procedural time is worth the high cost, privacy issues, battery complaints and user discomfort involved with these devices. There are promising applications of this technology in the areas of surgical education and consultation. However, more trials are necessary to assess the value of using smart glasses in these settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Surgical Innovation
Surgical Innovation 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Innovation (SRI) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal focusing on minimally invasive surgical techniques, new instruments such as laparoscopes and endoscopes, and new technologies. SRI prepares surgeons to think and work in "the operating room of the future" through learning new techniques, understanding and adapting to new technologies, maintaining surgical competencies, and applying surgical outcomes data to their practices. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信