中性粒细胞减少患者的阑尾炎:系统回顾。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
American Surgeon Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1177/00031348241265136
Tomasz Kasprzycki, Melissa Devito, Nancy Pina, David Winston, Marium Gul-Muhammad, Robert Joyner, Gopal Kowdley
{"title":"中性粒细胞减少患者的阑尾炎:系统回顾。","authors":"Tomasz Kasprzycki, Melissa Devito, Nancy Pina, David Winston, Marium Gul-Muhammad, Robert Joyner, Gopal Kowdley","doi":"10.1177/00031348241265136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neutropenia increases the complexity of surgical decision-making in cases of acute appendicitis. In this systematic review, we discuss medical vs surgical management and timing of appendectomy in the neutropenic adult patient. We queried databases utilizing the key words \"neutropenia\" and \"appendicitis.\" The search identified 999 articles of which 481 articles were reviewed after duplicates were removed. Studies with pediatric patients, single case studies, and abdominal pain in neutropenic patients not caused by appendicitis were excluded. Seven studies remained in this review accounting for 130 patients, of which 28 were diagnosed with neutropenic appendicitis, and were included for final analysis. Four of the 7 articles were case reports, demonstrating the relative paucity of literature on this subject. Studies referred to the high risk of morbidity and mortality after surgical intervention in the neutropenic population, and attempting medical management first was common but not universal, reserving appendectomy for failure of medical management. Three studies suggested medical therapy as first-line management while 2 studies suggested surgical management and 2 studies did not distinguish a precedence. Both medical and surgical management have been successfully used in treating appendicitis in neutropenic patients. In most patients, medical management was attempted first (n = 16/28) vs immediate appendectomy (n = 7/28). Appendectomy was performed when medical management failed (n = 2/28) or after correction of neutropenia (n = 1/28). Timing or performance of appendectomy was unclear in 2 patients. With the increasing use of immunosuppressive medications, broad-spectrum antibiotics, and recent data from the CODA (Comparison of Outcomes of Antibiotic Drugs and Appendectomy) trial, medical management as a first-line treatment for most patients with neutropenia and appendicitis is warranted, and identifying a protocol for such patients would be of value.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"3267-3271"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Appendicitis in the Neutropenic Patient: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Tomasz Kasprzycki, Melissa Devito, Nancy Pina, David Winston, Marium Gul-Muhammad, Robert Joyner, Gopal Kowdley\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00031348241265136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Neutropenia increases the complexity of surgical decision-making in cases of acute appendicitis. In this systematic review, we discuss medical vs surgical management and timing of appendectomy in the neutropenic adult patient. We queried databases utilizing the key words \\\"neutropenia\\\" and \\\"appendicitis.\\\" The search identified 999 articles of which 481 articles were reviewed after duplicates were removed. Studies with pediatric patients, single case studies, and abdominal pain in neutropenic patients not caused by appendicitis were excluded. Seven studies remained in this review accounting for 130 patients, of which 28 were diagnosed with neutropenic appendicitis, and were included for final analysis. Four of the 7 articles were case reports, demonstrating the relative paucity of literature on this subject. Studies referred to the high risk of morbidity and mortality after surgical intervention in the neutropenic population, and attempting medical management first was common but not universal, reserving appendectomy for failure of medical management. Three studies suggested medical therapy as first-line management while 2 studies suggested surgical management and 2 studies did not distinguish a precedence. Both medical and surgical management have been successfully used in treating appendicitis in neutropenic patients. In most patients, medical management was attempted first (n = 16/28) vs immediate appendectomy (n = 7/28). Appendectomy was performed when medical management failed (n = 2/28) or after correction of neutropenia (n = 1/28). Timing or performance of appendectomy was unclear in 2 patients. With the increasing use of immunosuppressive medications, broad-spectrum antibiotics, and recent data from the CODA (Comparison of Outcomes of Antibiotic Drugs and Appendectomy) trial, medical management as a first-line treatment for most patients with neutropenia and appendicitis is warranted, and identifying a protocol for such patients would be of value.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Surgeon\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3267-3271\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Surgeon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348241265136\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348241265136","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中性粒细胞减少增加了急性阑尾炎手术决策的复杂性。在这篇系统性综述中,我们讨论了中性粒细胞减少症成人患者的内科治疗与外科治疗以及阑尾切除术的时机。我们利用关键词 "中性粒细胞减少 "和 "阑尾炎 "对数据库进行了查询。搜索发现了 999 篇文章,在删除重复文章后,对其中 481 篇文章进行了审查。排除了儿科患者、单个病例研究以及非阑尾炎引起的中性粒细胞减少患者腹痛的研究。最终分析纳入了 7 项研究,涉及 130 名患者,其中 28 人被诊断为中性粒细胞性阑尾炎。7 篇文章中有 4 篇是病例报告,这表明有关这一主题的文献相对较少。研究提到,中性粒细胞增多症患者接受手术治疗后发病率和死亡率很高,首先尝试药物治疗很常见,但并不普遍,只有在药物治疗失败后才会进行阑尾切除术。三项研究建议将内科治疗作为一线治疗方案,两项研究建议采用外科治疗,两项研究没有区分先例。在治疗中性粒细胞增多症患者的阑尾炎时,药物治疗和手术治疗都取得了成功。在大多数患者中,首先尝试药物治疗(16/28 例),然后立即进行阑尾切除术(7/28 例)。当药物治疗失败(n = 2/28)或中性粒细胞减少症得到纠正(n = 1/28)后进行阑尾切除术。2例患者阑尾切除术的时机或实施情况不明确。随着免疫抑制药物、广谱抗生素的使用越来越多,以及 CODA(抗生素药物与阑尾切除术结果比较)试验的最新数据,医学治疗作为大多数中性粒细胞减少症合并阑尾炎患者的一线治疗方法是有必要的,为这类患者确定一个治疗方案将很有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Appendicitis in the Neutropenic Patient: A Systematic Review.

Neutropenia increases the complexity of surgical decision-making in cases of acute appendicitis. In this systematic review, we discuss medical vs surgical management and timing of appendectomy in the neutropenic adult patient. We queried databases utilizing the key words "neutropenia" and "appendicitis." The search identified 999 articles of which 481 articles were reviewed after duplicates were removed. Studies with pediatric patients, single case studies, and abdominal pain in neutropenic patients not caused by appendicitis were excluded. Seven studies remained in this review accounting for 130 patients, of which 28 were diagnosed with neutropenic appendicitis, and were included for final analysis. Four of the 7 articles were case reports, demonstrating the relative paucity of literature on this subject. Studies referred to the high risk of morbidity and mortality after surgical intervention in the neutropenic population, and attempting medical management first was common but not universal, reserving appendectomy for failure of medical management. Three studies suggested medical therapy as first-line management while 2 studies suggested surgical management and 2 studies did not distinguish a precedence. Both medical and surgical management have been successfully used in treating appendicitis in neutropenic patients. In most patients, medical management was attempted first (n = 16/28) vs immediate appendectomy (n = 7/28). Appendectomy was performed when medical management failed (n = 2/28) or after correction of neutropenia (n = 1/28). Timing or performance of appendectomy was unclear in 2 patients. With the increasing use of immunosuppressive medications, broad-spectrum antibiotics, and recent data from the CODA (Comparison of Outcomes of Antibiotic Drugs and Appendectomy) trial, medical management as a first-line treatment for most patients with neutropenia and appendicitis is warranted, and identifying a protocol for such patients would be of value.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Surgeon
American Surgeon 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
623
期刊介绍: The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信