重症监护室成人镇静和通气患者的疼痛管理:自由文本回复调查

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
{"title":"重症监护室成人镇静和通气患者的疼痛管理:自由文本回复调查","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Pain management of sedated and ventilated patients in intensive care units lacks consistency.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To investigate nurses’ training, governance, practices, knowledge and attitudes relating to pain management in consideration of published guidelines and explore nurses’ perspectives.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A survey design, using an online questionnaire with free text responses, was employed. Quantitative and qualitative data from nurses working across different hospitals were collated and saved on Qualtrics platform. Quantitative data were analysed non-parametrically and narrative responses thematically. CROSS and SRQR reporting guidelines were adhered to.</p></div><div><h3>Outcome measures</h3><p>Demographics, training, governance, clinical practice, knowledge, and attitudes.</p></div><div><h3>Results/findings</h3><p>108 nurses participated with ninety-two completed surveys analysed. Analgesia was used to complete nursing tasks regardless of comfort needs (n = 49, 53.3 %). Changes in vital signs prompted opioid administration (n = 48, 52.1 %). Choice of analgesia depended on doctor’s preference (n = 63, 68.5 %). Non-opioid therapy was administered before opioids (n = 42, 45.7 %). Sedatives were used to alleviate agitation(n = 50,54.3 %). No statistically significant difference in nurses’ knowledge existed between hospitals. Weak positive relationship: r = [0.081], p = [0.441] between “knowledge scores” and “years of ICU experience” and weak negative relationship r = [-0.119], p = [0.260] between “knowledge scores” and “hours of clinical practice” was detected. Lack of training, resources, policies, high patient acuity and casual employment were acknowledged barriers to pain management. Two overarching themes emerged from narrative responses: “Pain assessment, where is it?” And “Priorities of critical illness.”</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study uncovered pain management situation and examined nurses’ demographics, training, governance, practices, knowledge and attitudes. Narrative responses highlighted barriers to pain management.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for clinical practice</h3><p>Health organisations should provide education, institute governance and develop policies to inform pain management. Nurses’ role encompasses updating knowledge, adhering to interventions and overcoming biases. This subsequently manifests as improvement in patient outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51322,"journal":{"name":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339724001551/pdfft?md5=36dfd50869b1b66783c9cef64dd79cd1&pid=1-s2.0-S0964339724001551-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pain management of adult sedated and ventilated patients in the intensive care units: A survey with free text responses\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103770\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Pain management of sedated and ventilated patients in intensive care units lacks consistency.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To investigate nurses’ training, governance, practices, knowledge and attitudes relating to pain management in consideration of published guidelines and explore nurses’ perspectives.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A survey design, using an online questionnaire with free text responses, was employed. Quantitative and qualitative data from nurses working across different hospitals were collated and saved on Qualtrics platform. Quantitative data were analysed non-parametrically and narrative responses thematically. CROSS and SRQR reporting guidelines were adhered to.</p></div><div><h3>Outcome measures</h3><p>Demographics, training, governance, clinical practice, knowledge, and attitudes.</p></div><div><h3>Results/findings</h3><p>108 nurses participated with ninety-two completed surveys analysed. Analgesia was used to complete nursing tasks regardless of comfort needs (n = 49, 53.3 %). Changes in vital signs prompted opioid administration (n = 48, 52.1 %). Choice of analgesia depended on doctor’s preference (n = 63, 68.5 %). Non-opioid therapy was administered before opioids (n = 42, 45.7 %). Sedatives were used to alleviate agitation(n = 50,54.3 %). No statistically significant difference in nurses’ knowledge existed between hospitals. Weak positive relationship: r = [0.081], p = [0.441] between “knowledge scores” and “years of ICU experience” and weak negative relationship r = [-0.119], p = [0.260] between “knowledge scores” and “hours of clinical practice” was detected. Lack of training, resources, policies, high patient acuity and casual employment were acknowledged barriers to pain management. Two overarching themes emerged from narrative responses: “Pain assessment, where is it?” And “Priorities of critical illness.”</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study uncovered pain management situation and examined nurses’ demographics, training, governance, practices, knowledge and attitudes. Narrative responses highlighted barriers to pain management.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for clinical practice</h3><p>Health organisations should provide education, institute governance and develop policies to inform pain management. Nurses’ role encompasses updating knowledge, adhering to interventions and overcoming biases. This subsequently manifests as improvement in patient outcomes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339724001551/pdfft?md5=36dfd50869b1b66783c9cef64dd79cd1&pid=1-s2.0-S0964339724001551-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339724001551\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339724001551","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景重症监护病房对镇静和通气患者的疼痛管理缺乏一致性。目标根据已发布的指南,调查护士在疼痛管理方面的培训、管理、实践、知识和态度,并探讨护士的观点。方法采用自由文本回答的在线问卷调查设计。对来自不同医院的护士的定量和定性数据进行了整理,并保存在 Qualtrics 平台上。对定量数据进行非参数分析,对叙述性回答进行主题分析。结果测量人口统计学、培训、管理、临床实践、知识和态度。结果/发现108名护士参与了调查,对92份完成的调查问卷进行了分析。在完成护理任务时,无论是否需要舒适,都会使用镇痛剂(n = 49,53.3%)。生命体征的变化促使使用阿片类药物(48 人,占 52.1%)。镇痛的选择取决于医生的偏好(n = 63,68.5%)。在使用阿片类药物之前先使用非阿片类药物(42 人,占 45.7%)。镇静剂用于缓解躁动(50 人,占 54.3%)。不同医院之间护士的知识水平差异无统计学意义。知识得分 "与 "ICU 工作年限 "之间存在微弱的正相关关系:r = [0.081],p = [0.441];"知识得分 "与 "临床实践时间 "之间存在微弱的负相关关系:r = [-0.119],p = [0.260]。缺乏培训、资源、政策、病人急诊率高和临时工是公认的疼痛管理障碍。在叙述性回答中出现了两个最重要的主题:"疼痛评估在哪里?和 "危重病人的优先权"。 结论这项研究揭示了疼痛管理的现状,并考察了护士的人口统计、培训、管理、实践、知识和态度。对临床实践的启示医疗机构应提供教育、实施管理和制定政策,为疼痛管理提供信息。护士的职责包括更新知识、坚持干预和克服偏见。这随后将表现为患者治疗效果的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pain management of adult sedated and ventilated patients in the intensive care units: A survey with free text responses

Background

Pain management of sedated and ventilated patients in intensive care units lacks consistency.

Objectives

To investigate nurses’ training, governance, practices, knowledge and attitudes relating to pain management in consideration of published guidelines and explore nurses’ perspectives.

Methods

A survey design, using an online questionnaire with free text responses, was employed. Quantitative and qualitative data from nurses working across different hospitals were collated and saved on Qualtrics platform. Quantitative data were analysed non-parametrically and narrative responses thematically. CROSS and SRQR reporting guidelines were adhered to.

Outcome measures

Demographics, training, governance, clinical practice, knowledge, and attitudes.

Results/findings

108 nurses participated with ninety-two completed surveys analysed. Analgesia was used to complete nursing tasks regardless of comfort needs (n = 49, 53.3 %). Changes in vital signs prompted opioid administration (n = 48, 52.1 %). Choice of analgesia depended on doctor’s preference (n = 63, 68.5 %). Non-opioid therapy was administered before opioids (n = 42, 45.7 %). Sedatives were used to alleviate agitation(n = 50,54.3 %). No statistically significant difference in nurses’ knowledge existed between hospitals. Weak positive relationship: r = [0.081], p = [0.441] between “knowledge scores” and “years of ICU experience” and weak negative relationship r = [-0.119], p = [0.260] between “knowledge scores” and “hours of clinical practice” was detected. Lack of training, resources, policies, high patient acuity and casual employment were acknowledged barriers to pain management. Two overarching themes emerged from narrative responses: “Pain assessment, where is it?” And “Priorities of critical illness.”

Conclusion

The study uncovered pain management situation and examined nurses’ demographics, training, governance, practices, knowledge and attitudes. Narrative responses highlighted barriers to pain management.

Implications for clinical practice

Health organisations should provide education, institute governance and develop policies to inform pain management. Nurses’ role encompasses updating knowledge, adhering to interventions and overcoming biases. This subsequently manifests as improvement in patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
15.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The aims of Intensive and Critical Care Nursing are to promote excellence of care of critically ill patients by specialist nurses and their professional colleagues; to provide an international and interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and exchange of research findings, experience and ideas; to develop and enhance the knowledge, skills, attitudes and creative thinking essential to good critical care nursing practice. The journal publishes reviews, updates and feature articles in addition to original papers and significant preliminary communications. Articles may deal with any part of practice including relevant clinical, research, educational, psychological and technological aspects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信