美国的按需移动--整合现状和提高互操作性的政策考虑因素

IF 5.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION
Vishal C. Kummetha, Sisinnio Concas , Lisa Staes , Jodi Godfrey
{"title":"美国的按需移动--整合现状和提高互操作性的政策考虑因素","authors":"Vishal C. Kummetha,&nbsp;Sisinnio Concas ,&nbsp;Lisa Staes ,&nbsp;Jodi Godfrey","doi":"10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The concept of Mobility on Demand (MOD) aims to create a safe and convenient ecosystem for transportation and goods delivery. Despite offering various services, the integration and seamless data exchange among different modes of transportation remain challenging. To address this, research was conducted to examine the current state of integration in the MOD ecosystem, identify gaps in data exchange, and propose policy considerations. The research highlighted the limited integration and inconsistent data structures in the United States (U.S.), attributed to the absence of policy directives and high costs of traditional standards development. Industry-led initiatives are driving progress in standards and specifications. Deep linking and deep integration were distinguished, emphasizing the importance of a truly user-centric MOD solution. Emerging mobility models leveraging blockchain technology show promise in facilitating efficient data sharing and collaboration among various operators. Transportation policy makers play a crucial role in supporting open-source standards and integration efforts. An initial framework utilizing open-source efforts such as Transport Operator Mobility-as-a-service Provider (TOMP), Mobility Data Specification (MDS), General On-demand Feed Specification (GOFS), Transactional Data Specification (TDS), Operational Data Standard (ODS), and City Data Standard for Mobility (CDS-M) was proposed to drive the advancement of scalable and user-centric MOD systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51534,"journal":{"name":"Travel Behaviour and Society","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 100867"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mobility on demand in the United States – Current state of integration and policy considerations for improved interoperability\",\"authors\":\"Vishal C. Kummetha,&nbsp;Sisinnio Concas ,&nbsp;Lisa Staes ,&nbsp;Jodi Godfrey\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100867\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The concept of Mobility on Demand (MOD) aims to create a safe and convenient ecosystem for transportation and goods delivery. Despite offering various services, the integration and seamless data exchange among different modes of transportation remain challenging. To address this, research was conducted to examine the current state of integration in the MOD ecosystem, identify gaps in data exchange, and propose policy considerations. The research highlighted the limited integration and inconsistent data structures in the United States (U.S.), attributed to the absence of policy directives and high costs of traditional standards development. Industry-led initiatives are driving progress in standards and specifications. Deep linking and deep integration were distinguished, emphasizing the importance of a truly user-centric MOD solution. Emerging mobility models leveraging blockchain technology show promise in facilitating efficient data sharing and collaboration among various operators. Transportation policy makers play a crucial role in supporting open-source standards and integration efforts. An initial framework utilizing open-source efforts such as Transport Operator Mobility-as-a-service Provider (TOMP), Mobility Data Specification (MDS), General On-demand Feed Specification (GOFS), Transactional Data Specification (TDS), Operational Data Standard (ODS), and City Data Standard for Mobility (CDS-M) was proposed to drive the advancement of scalable and user-centric MOD systems.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Travel Behaviour and Society\",\"volume\":\"37 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100867\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Travel Behaviour and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X24001303\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Travel Behaviour and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X24001303","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

按需移动(MOD)的概念旨在创建一个安全便捷的运输和货物交付生态系统。尽管提供了各种服务,但不同运输方式之间的整合和无缝数据交换仍具有挑战性。为解决这一问题,我们开展了一项研究,以考察 MOD 生态系统的整合现状,找出数据交换方面的差距,并提出政策考虑因素。研究强调,美国的集成度有限,数据结构不一致,原因是缺乏政策指示和传统标准开发成本高昂。行业主导的倡议推动了标准和规范的进步。深度链接和深度整合得到了区分,强调了真正以用户为中心的 MOD 解决方案的重要性。利用区块链技术的新兴移动模式在促进不同运营商之间的高效数据共享与协作方面大有可为。交通政策制定者在支持开源标准和集成工作方面发挥着至关重要的作用。为推动可扩展的、以用户为中心的 MOD 系统的发展,我们提出了一个利用开源工作的初始框架,如运输运营商移动即服务提供商(TOMP)、移动数据规范(MDS)、通用按需馈送规范(GOFS)、交易数据规范(TDS)、运营数据标准(ODS)和城市移动数据标准(CDS-M)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mobility on demand in the United States – Current state of integration and policy considerations for improved interoperability

The concept of Mobility on Demand (MOD) aims to create a safe and convenient ecosystem for transportation and goods delivery. Despite offering various services, the integration and seamless data exchange among different modes of transportation remain challenging. To address this, research was conducted to examine the current state of integration in the MOD ecosystem, identify gaps in data exchange, and propose policy considerations. The research highlighted the limited integration and inconsistent data structures in the United States (U.S.), attributed to the absence of policy directives and high costs of traditional standards development. Industry-led initiatives are driving progress in standards and specifications. Deep linking and deep integration were distinguished, emphasizing the importance of a truly user-centric MOD solution. Emerging mobility models leveraging blockchain technology show promise in facilitating efficient data sharing and collaboration among various operators. Transportation policy makers play a crucial role in supporting open-source standards and integration efforts. An initial framework utilizing open-source efforts such as Transport Operator Mobility-as-a-service Provider (TOMP), Mobility Data Specification (MDS), General On-demand Feed Specification (GOFS), Transactional Data Specification (TDS), Operational Data Standard (ODS), and City Data Standard for Mobility (CDS-M) was proposed to drive the advancement of scalable and user-centric MOD systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: Travel Behaviour and Society is an interdisciplinary journal publishing high-quality original papers which report leading edge research in theories, methodologies and applications concerning transportation issues and challenges which involve the social and spatial dimensions. In particular, it provides a discussion forum for major research in travel behaviour, transportation infrastructure, transportation and environmental issues, mobility and social sustainability, transportation geographic information systems (TGIS), transportation and quality of life, transportation data collection and analysis, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信