从知识整合的角度对基于 TPACK 的干预措施进行系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 4.1 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Armin Fabian , Iris Backfisch , Kenneth Kirchner , Andreas Lachner
{"title":"从知识整合的角度对基于 TPACK 的干预措施进行系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Armin Fabian ,&nbsp;Iris Backfisch ,&nbsp;Kenneth Kirchner ,&nbsp;Andreas Lachner","doi":"10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Designing effective interventions that foster (pre-service) teachers' knowledge to teach with technologies is paramount in education research. Researchers have prominently relied on the TPACK-model as theoretical foundation to design such interventions. However, a myriad of distinct TPACK-based interventions emerged, which likely targeted the different knowledge components of TPACK to varying extents. Given this diversity and the lack of performance-based measures to estimate competence growth, little is known about the effectiveness of respective interventions. In the present synthesis study, we therefore sought to systemize TPACK-based interventions regarding targeted knowledge domains across various contexts. Accordingly, we scrutinized which of the TPACK-components were explicitly targeted in TPACK-based interventions within the framework of a systematic review. Further, we conducted a subsequent meta-analysis based on studies applying performance-based measures to investigate whether the targeted knowledge domains affected the effectiveness of interventions. Based on a set of <em>N</em> = 163 primary intervention studies and one theoretical contribution, our analyses suggest that Technological Knowledge was the most prominent targeted TPACK-component. Interestingly, in more than 20% of the interventions, specific training on Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (i.e., TPCK) was absent although TPCK is considered crucial for successful technology integration. Results further revealed that researchers do not seem to have adapted the design of interventions on instructional contexts (such as the expertise level of the target audience). The results of the subsequent meta-analysis (<em>N</em> = 8) further provided no clear evidence that targeted TPACK-components affected the effectiveness of interventions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100322,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Open","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100200"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557324000405/pdfft?md5=e9fc829432bddb2d393bcbb223891c49&pid=1-s2.0-S2666557324000405-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review and meta-analysis on TPACK-based interventions from a perspective of knowledge integration\",\"authors\":\"Armin Fabian ,&nbsp;Iris Backfisch ,&nbsp;Kenneth Kirchner ,&nbsp;Andreas Lachner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Designing effective interventions that foster (pre-service) teachers' knowledge to teach with technologies is paramount in education research. Researchers have prominently relied on the TPACK-model as theoretical foundation to design such interventions. However, a myriad of distinct TPACK-based interventions emerged, which likely targeted the different knowledge components of TPACK to varying extents. Given this diversity and the lack of performance-based measures to estimate competence growth, little is known about the effectiveness of respective interventions. In the present synthesis study, we therefore sought to systemize TPACK-based interventions regarding targeted knowledge domains across various contexts. Accordingly, we scrutinized which of the TPACK-components were explicitly targeted in TPACK-based interventions within the framework of a systematic review. Further, we conducted a subsequent meta-analysis based on studies applying performance-based measures to investigate whether the targeted knowledge domains affected the effectiveness of interventions. Based on a set of <em>N</em> = 163 primary intervention studies and one theoretical contribution, our analyses suggest that Technological Knowledge was the most prominent targeted TPACK-component. Interestingly, in more than 20% of the interventions, specific training on Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (i.e., TPCK) was absent although TPCK is considered crucial for successful technology integration. Results further revealed that researchers do not seem to have adapted the design of interventions on instructional contexts (such as the expertise level of the target audience). The results of the subsequent meta-analysis (<em>N</em> = 8) further provided no clear evidence that targeted TPACK-components affected the effectiveness of interventions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers and Education Open\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557324000405/pdfft?md5=e9fc829432bddb2d393bcbb223891c49&pid=1-s2.0-S2666557324000405-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers and Education Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557324000405\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Education Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557324000405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

设计有效的干预措施,培养(职前)教师利用技术进行教学的知识,是教育研究的重中之重。研究人员主要以 TPACK 模型作为设计此类干预措施的理论基础。然而,基于 TPACK 的干预措施层出不穷,这些干预措施可能在不同程度上针对 TPACK 的不同知识组成部分。鉴于干预措施的多样性,以及缺乏以绩效为基础的衡量标准来评估能力增长情况,人们对各种干预措施的有效性知之甚少。因此,在本综述研究中,我们试图系统地整理基于 TPACK 的干预措施在不同情况下针对的知识领域。因此,我们在系统综述的框架内,仔细研究了基于 TPACK 的干预措施明确针对哪些 TPACK 组成部分。此外,我们还对采用基于绩效的测量方法的研究进行了荟萃分析,以研究目标知识领域是否会影响干预措施的效果。基于 N = 163 项主要干预研究和一项理论贡献,我们的分析表明,技术知识是最突出的目标 TPACK 要素。有趣的是,在超过 20% 的干预研究中,尽管技术教学内容知识(TPCK)被认为是成功技术整合的关键,但却没有针对技术教学内容知识(TPCK)的具体培训。研究结果还显示,研究人员似乎没有根据教学环境(如目标受众的专业知识水平)调整干预措施的设计。随后的荟萃分析(N = 8)结果进一步表明,没有明确证据表明有针对性的技术知识包要素会影响干预措施的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A systematic review and meta-analysis on TPACK-based interventions from a perspective of knowledge integration

Designing effective interventions that foster (pre-service) teachers' knowledge to teach with technologies is paramount in education research. Researchers have prominently relied on the TPACK-model as theoretical foundation to design such interventions. However, a myriad of distinct TPACK-based interventions emerged, which likely targeted the different knowledge components of TPACK to varying extents. Given this diversity and the lack of performance-based measures to estimate competence growth, little is known about the effectiveness of respective interventions. In the present synthesis study, we therefore sought to systemize TPACK-based interventions regarding targeted knowledge domains across various contexts. Accordingly, we scrutinized which of the TPACK-components were explicitly targeted in TPACK-based interventions within the framework of a systematic review. Further, we conducted a subsequent meta-analysis based on studies applying performance-based measures to investigate whether the targeted knowledge domains affected the effectiveness of interventions. Based on a set of N = 163 primary intervention studies and one theoretical contribution, our analyses suggest that Technological Knowledge was the most prominent targeted TPACK-component. Interestingly, in more than 20% of the interventions, specific training on Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (i.e., TPCK) was absent although TPCK is considered crucial for successful technology integration. Results further revealed that researchers do not seem to have adapted the design of interventions on instructional contexts (such as the expertise level of the target audience). The results of the subsequent meta-analysis (N = 8) further provided no clear evidence that targeted TPACK-components affected the effectiveness of interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信