迷走神经刺激配合康复治疗慢性中风:确定响应者的特征。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1097/NPT.0000000000000488
Alexa Beovich, Jessica Boose, Rachana Patel, Steven L Wolf
{"title":"迷走神经刺激配合康复治疗慢性中风:确定响应者的特征。","authors":"Alexa Beovich, Jessica Boose, Rachana Patel, Steven L Wolf","doi":"10.1097/NPT.0000000000000488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Implantable vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) paired with volitional upper extremity rehabilitation can improve impairment and function among moderately to severely impaired, chronic stroke survivors. This study is a retrospective analysis of the in-clinic rehabilitation phase of the blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized pivotal VNS-REHAB trial to determine whether dosing parameters during in-clinic paired VNS therapy were associated with responder status and whether covariates might impact that determination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were limited to 53 participants in the active VNS group who had received VNS implants prior to undergoing 6 weeks of in-clinic rehabilitation paired with VNS. Tasks were standardized across all participants. Dosing parameters included number of stimulations and task time. The primary outcome was the Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Assessment (FMA-UE), evaluated at the end of 6 weeks (Post-1). Participants were classified a priori as responders based on an improvement of ≥6 points on the FMA-UE from baseline to Post-1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dosing parameters were not associated with FMA-UE responder status at the end of 6 weeks. Covariates including age, gender, paretic hand, baseline severity, and chronicity of stroke were also not significant associations of response.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>While responders to VNS could be defined, therapy dosing and participant attributes did not provide greater specification for association of responder status. Limitations of this study include small sample size and non-linearity of the FMA-UE. Future studies will include reassessing responder categorization using more linear scales and examining stroke lesion characteristics to determine whether these measures are more sensitive to dosing parameters.</p><p><strong>Video abstract available: </strong>for more insights from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink ).</p>","PeriodicalId":49030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"217-223"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired With Rehabilitation for Chronic Stroke: Characterizing Responders.\",\"authors\":\"Alexa Beovich, Jessica Boose, Rachana Patel, Steven L Wolf\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/NPT.0000000000000488\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Implantable vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) paired with volitional upper extremity rehabilitation can improve impairment and function among moderately to severely impaired, chronic stroke survivors. This study is a retrospective analysis of the in-clinic rehabilitation phase of the blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized pivotal VNS-REHAB trial to determine whether dosing parameters during in-clinic paired VNS therapy were associated with responder status and whether covariates might impact that determination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were limited to 53 participants in the active VNS group who had received VNS implants prior to undergoing 6 weeks of in-clinic rehabilitation paired with VNS. Tasks were standardized across all participants. Dosing parameters included number of stimulations and task time. The primary outcome was the Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Assessment (FMA-UE), evaluated at the end of 6 weeks (Post-1). Participants were classified a priori as responders based on an improvement of ≥6 points on the FMA-UE from baseline to Post-1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dosing parameters were not associated with FMA-UE responder status at the end of 6 weeks. Covariates including age, gender, paretic hand, baseline severity, and chronicity of stroke were also not significant associations of response.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>While responders to VNS could be defined, therapy dosing and participant attributes did not provide greater specification for association of responder status. Limitations of this study include small sample size and non-linearity of the FMA-UE. Future studies will include reassessing responder categorization using more linear scales and examining stroke lesion characteristics to determine whether these measures are more sensitive to dosing parameters.</p><p><strong>Video abstract available: </strong>for more insights from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink ).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"217-223\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/NPT.0000000000000488\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NPT.0000000000000488","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:植入式迷走神经刺激(VNS)与自愿上肢康复治疗配对可改善中度至重度受损的慢性中风幸存者的损伤和功能。本研究是对盲法安慰剂对照随机关键性 VNS-REHAB 试验临床康复阶段的回顾性分析,目的是确定临床配对 VNS 治疗期间的剂量参数是否与应答状态相关,以及协变量是否会影响这一判断:数据仅限于主动 VNS 组的 53 名参与者,他们在接受为期 6 周的与 VNS 配对的诊所内康复治疗之前接受了 VNS 植入。所有参与者的任务均已标准化。剂量参数包括刺激次数和任务时间。主要结果是 Fugl-Meyer 上肢评估(FMA-UE),在 6 周结束时进行评估(Post-1)。根据 FMA-UE 从基线到后期-1 的改善幅度≥6 分,参与者被预先划分为应答者:结果:用药参数与 6 周后的 FMA-UE 反应者状态无关。包括年龄、性别、瘫痪手、基线严重程度和中风的慢性程度在内的协变量也与反应无显著关联:讨论与结论:虽然可以界定 VNS 的应答者,但治疗剂量和参与者的属性并不能为应答者状态的相关性提供更明确的说明。本研究的局限性包括样本量小和 FMA-UE 的非线性。未来的研究将包括使用更线性的量表重新评估应答者分类,并检查卒中病变特征,以确定这些测量方法是否对剂量参数更敏感。视频摘要:如需了解作者的更多见解(请参阅视频,补充数字内容1,网址:http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired With Rehabilitation for Chronic Stroke: Characterizing Responders.

Background and purpose: Implantable vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) paired with volitional upper extremity rehabilitation can improve impairment and function among moderately to severely impaired, chronic stroke survivors. This study is a retrospective analysis of the in-clinic rehabilitation phase of the blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized pivotal VNS-REHAB trial to determine whether dosing parameters during in-clinic paired VNS therapy were associated with responder status and whether covariates might impact that determination.

Methods: Data were limited to 53 participants in the active VNS group who had received VNS implants prior to undergoing 6 weeks of in-clinic rehabilitation paired with VNS. Tasks were standardized across all participants. Dosing parameters included number of stimulations and task time. The primary outcome was the Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Assessment (FMA-UE), evaluated at the end of 6 weeks (Post-1). Participants were classified a priori as responders based on an improvement of ≥6 points on the FMA-UE from baseline to Post-1.

Results: Dosing parameters were not associated with FMA-UE responder status at the end of 6 weeks. Covariates including age, gender, paretic hand, baseline severity, and chronicity of stroke were also not significant associations of response.

Discussion and conclusions: While responders to VNS could be defined, therapy dosing and participant attributes did not provide greater specification for association of responder status. Limitations of this study include small sample size and non-linearity of the FMA-UE. Future studies will include reassessing responder categorization using more linear scales and examining stroke lesion characteristics to determine whether these measures are more sensitive to dosing parameters.

Video abstract available: for more insights from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink ).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy
Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
63
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy (JNPT) is an indexed resource for dissemination of research-based evidence related to neurologic physical therapy intervention. High standards of quality are maintained through a rigorous, double-blinded, peer-review process and adherence to standards recommended by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. With an international editorial board made up of preeminent researchers and clinicians, JNPT publishes articles of global relevance for examination, evaluation, prognosis, intervention, and outcomes for individuals with movement deficits due to neurologic conditions. Through systematic reviews, research articles, case studies, and clinical perspectives, JNPT promotes the integration of evidence into theory, education, research, and practice of neurologic physical therapy, spanning the continuum from pathophysiology to societal participation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信