Zenalabdin H. Jabir PharmD, Travis S. Grey PharmD, BCPS, BCCCP, Angela R. Morelli PharmD, BCPS, BCIDP, Brandon D. Nornhold PharmD, Jestin N. Carlson MD, MS, MHA, Diane V. Thompson M.S, Animesh C. Gour MD
{"title":"第二次抗生素剂量延迟与脓毒性休克患者死亡率的关系。","authors":"Zenalabdin H. Jabir PharmD, Travis S. Grey PharmD, BCPS, BCCCP, Angela R. Morelli PharmD, BCPS, BCIDP, Brandon D. Nornhold PharmD, Jestin N. Carlson MD, MS, MHA, Diane V. Thompson M.S, Animesh C. Gour MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.154866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Determine whether a delay in the administration of the second dose of antibiotics is associated with an increased risk of mortality for patients admitted with septic shock.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Retrospective, observational evaluation.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Regional multicenter evaluation including four institutions in western Pennsylvania.</p></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><p>A total of 905 patients were included in this study who met the criteria for septic shock. Patients that did not receive a second dose of antibiotics, were transferred from an outside facility, or expected death within six hours of hospital admission were excluded.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>The frequency of second antibiotic dose administration delay was determined. A delay was defined as a delay greater than or equal to 25% of the antibiotic dosing interval.</p></div><div><h3>Measurements and main results</h3><p>A delay in second antibiotic dose administration was found in 181 (20%) of patients. Patients with a delay in the administration of second dose antibiotics had a higher mortality rate (35%) than patients without a delay (26%) (<em>p</em> =0.018). Patients with and without a delay in the administration of second-dose antibiotics had similar median 28-day vasopressor free days (median = 26.0, IQR = 2.0). Differences in the distribution of the 28-day vasopressor free days between groups resulted in the achievement of statistical significance (Mann-Whitney U = 57,294.5, z = −2.690, <em>p</em> = 0.006). There was no difference in 28-day ventilator-free days between groups. A delay in the administration of second dose antibiotics led to a longer in-hospital length of stay (9 days vs. 7 days; <em>p</em> = 0.022) and a longer ICU length of stay than patients without a delay (5 days vs. 3 days; <em>p</em> = 0.007).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Delays in second antibiotic dose administration in septic shock patients were present but lower than previous studies. These delays were associated with increased mortality, increased ICU and hospital length of stay.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of critical care","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 154866"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883944124003538/pdfft?md5=208b61c2418aae33e2a924e19172eed6&pid=1-s2.0-S0883944124003538-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of second antibiotic dose delays on mortality in patients with septic shock\",\"authors\":\"Zenalabdin H. Jabir PharmD, Travis S. Grey PharmD, BCPS, BCCCP, Angela R. Morelli PharmD, BCPS, BCIDP, Brandon D. Nornhold PharmD, Jestin N. Carlson MD, MS, MHA, Diane V. Thompson M.S, Animesh C. Gour MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.154866\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Determine whether a delay in the administration of the second dose of antibiotics is associated with an increased risk of mortality for patients admitted with septic shock.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Retrospective, observational evaluation.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Regional multicenter evaluation including four institutions in western Pennsylvania.</p></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><p>A total of 905 patients were included in this study who met the criteria for septic shock. Patients that did not receive a second dose of antibiotics, were transferred from an outside facility, or expected death within six hours of hospital admission were excluded.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>The frequency of second antibiotic dose administration delay was determined. A delay was defined as a delay greater than or equal to 25% of the antibiotic dosing interval.</p></div><div><h3>Measurements and main results</h3><p>A delay in second antibiotic dose administration was found in 181 (20%) of patients. Patients with a delay in the administration of second dose antibiotics had a higher mortality rate (35%) than patients without a delay (26%) (<em>p</em> =0.018). Patients with and without a delay in the administration of second-dose antibiotics had similar median 28-day vasopressor free days (median = 26.0, IQR = 2.0). Differences in the distribution of the 28-day vasopressor free days between groups resulted in the achievement of statistical significance (Mann-Whitney U = 57,294.5, z = −2.690, <em>p</em> = 0.006). There was no difference in 28-day ventilator-free days between groups. A delay in the administration of second dose antibiotics led to a longer in-hospital length of stay (9 days vs. 7 days; <em>p</em> = 0.022) and a longer ICU length of stay than patients without a delay (5 days vs. 3 days; <em>p</em> = 0.007).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Delays in second antibiotic dose administration in septic shock patients were present but lower than previous studies. These delays were associated with increased mortality, increased ICU and hospital length of stay.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of critical care\",\"volume\":\"84 \",\"pages\":\"Article 154866\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883944124003538/pdfft?md5=208b61c2418aae33e2a924e19172eed6&pid=1-s2.0-S0883944124003538-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of critical care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883944124003538\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of critical care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883944124003538","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:确定延迟使用第二剂抗生素是否会增加脓毒性休克患者的死亡风险:确定延迟使用第二剂抗生素是否会增加脓毒性休克患者的死亡风险:设计:回顾性观察评估:地区多中心评估,包括宾夕法尼亚州西部的四家机构:本研究共纳入 905 名符合脓毒性休克标准的患者。未接受第二剂抗生素治疗的患者、从外部机构转院的患者或预计在入院后六小时内死亡的患者被排除在外:干预措施:确定延迟使用第二剂抗生素的频率。干预措施:测定第二次抗生素给药延迟的频率,延迟时间大于或等于抗生素给药间隔时间的 25%:181例(20%)患者的第二次抗生素给药延迟。延迟使用第二剂抗生素的患者死亡率(35%)高于未延迟使用抗生素的患者(26%)(P =0.018)。延迟使用第二剂抗生素和未延迟使用第二剂抗生素的患者的 28 天无血管舒张剂天数中位数相似(中位数 = 26.0,IQR = 2.0)。各组间 28 天无血管舒张剂天数的分布差异具有统计学意义(Mann-Whitney U = 57,294.5, z = -2.690, p = 0.006)。组间 28 天无呼吸机天数无差异。与未延迟给药的患者相比,延迟给药的患者住院时间更长(9天 vs. 7天;p = 0.022),入住重症监护室的时间更长(5天 vs. 3天;p = 0.007):结论:脓毒性休克患者第二次使用抗生素的时间存在延迟,但低于以往的研究。这些延迟与死亡率增加、重症监护室和住院时间延长有关。
Association of second antibiotic dose delays on mortality in patients with septic shock
Objective
Determine whether a delay in the administration of the second dose of antibiotics is associated with an increased risk of mortality for patients admitted with septic shock.
Design
Retrospective, observational evaluation.
Setting
Regional multicenter evaluation including four institutions in western Pennsylvania.
Patients
A total of 905 patients were included in this study who met the criteria for septic shock. Patients that did not receive a second dose of antibiotics, were transferred from an outside facility, or expected death within six hours of hospital admission were excluded.
Interventions
The frequency of second antibiotic dose administration delay was determined. A delay was defined as a delay greater than or equal to 25% of the antibiotic dosing interval.
Measurements and main results
A delay in second antibiotic dose administration was found in 181 (20%) of patients. Patients with a delay in the administration of second dose antibiotics had a higher mortality rate (35%) than patients without a delay (26%) (p =0.018). Patients with and without a delay in the administration of second-dose antibiotics had similar median 28-day vasopressor free days (median = 26.0, IQR = 2.0). Differences in the distribution of the 28-day vasopressor free days between groups resulted in the achievement of statistical significance (Mann-Whitney U = 57,294.5, z = −2.690, p = 0.006). There was no difference in 28-day ventilator-free days between groups. A delay in the administration of second dose antibiotics led to a longer in-hospital length of stay (9 days vs. 7 days; p = 0.022) and a longer ICU length of stay than patients without a delay (5 days vs. 3 days; p = 0.007).
Conclusions
Delays in second antibiotic dose administration in septic shock patients were present but lower than previous studies. These delays were associated with increased mortality, increased ICU and hospital length of stay.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Critical Care, the official publication of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine (WFSICCM), is a leading international, peer-reviewed journal providing original research, review articles, tutorials, and invited articles for physicians and allied health professionals involved in treating the critically ill. The Journal aims to improve patient care by furthering understanding of health systems research and its integration into clinical practice.
The Journal will include articles which discuss:
All aspects of health services research in critical care
System based practice in anesthesiology, perioperative and critical care medicine
The interface between anesthesiology, critical care medicine and pain
Integrating intraoperative management in preparation for postoperative critical care management and recovery
Optimizing patient management, i.e., exploring the interface between evidence-based principles or clinical insight into management and care of complex patients
The team approach in the OR and ICU
System-based research
Medical ethics
Technology in medicine
Seminars discussing current, state of the art, and sometimes controversial topics in anesthesiology, critical care medicine, and professional education
Residency Education.