简化、有意义的业务项目进度跟踪

Q1 Business, Management and Accounting
Frank Einhorn;Jack Meredith
{"title":"简化、有意义的业务项目进度跟踪","authors":"Frank Einhorn;Jack Meredith","doi":"10.1109/EMR.2024.3370260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is important for executives to understand the status of business projects in their areas of accountability, allowing timely decisions to be taken. But often this does not happen due to lack of, or misleading, reporting. One reason is shortcomings in the widely accepted textbook approach, referred to here as “classical” earned value management (CEVM). While such approaches are often used for construction projects, they do not work well for business projects. The reason is that CEVM works for projects whose scope activities are well understood, possible to estimate upfront, and change relatively little. Business projects seldom meet any of these criteria. This and other factors render CEVM impractical for almost all business projects. Project managers who try to use it for business projects usually find they are unable to obtain meaningful information, and thus blame themselves, whereas the problem is that CEVM is unsuitable for these kinds of projects. Fortunately, alternatives exist that honor the earned value principles and can be used quickly and meaningfully for business projects. One such approach, labeled project progress tracker, is outlined here. It uses a simple spreadsheet and works as well for an agile project as for any other business project.","PeriodicalId":35585,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Engineering Management Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simplified, Meaningful, Progress Tracking for Business Projects\",\"authors\":\"Frank Einhorn;Jack Meredith\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EMR.2024.3370260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is important for executives to understand the status of business projects in their areas of accountability, allowing timely decisions to be taken. But often this does not happen due to lack of, or misleading, reporting. One reason is shortcomings in the widely accepted textbook approach, referred to here as “classical” earned value management (CEVM). While such approaches are often used for construction projects, they do not work well for business projects. The reason is that CEVM works for projects whose scope activities are well understood, possible to estimate upfront, and change relatively little. Business projects seldom meet any of these criteria. This and other factors render CEVM impractical for almost all business projects. Project managers who try to use it for business projects usually find they are unable to obtain meaningful information, and thus blame themselves, whereas the problem is that CEVM is unsuitable for these kinds of projects. Fortunately, alternatives exist that honor the earned value principles and can be used quickly and meaningfully for business projects. One such approach, labeled project progress tracker, is outlined here. It uses a simple spreadsheet and works as well for an agile project as for any other business project.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Engineering Management Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Engineering Management Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10453944/\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Engineering Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10453944/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于高管来说,了解其负责领域内业务项目的状况,以便及时做出决策,是非常重要的。但由于缺乏报告或报告误导,往往无法做到这一点。原因之一是广为接受的教科书方法存在缺陷,在此被称为 "经典 "挣值管理(CEVM)。虽然这种方法常用于建筑项目,但在商业项目中并不适用。原因在于,CEVM 适用于范围活动非常明确、可以预先估算且变化相对较小的项目。商业项目很少符合这些标准。这一点以及其他因素导致 CEVM 几乎不适用于所有商业项目。试图在商业项目中使用 CEVM 的项目经理通常会发现,他们无法获得有意义的信息,从而责怪自己,而问题在于 CEVM 不适合这类项目。幸运的是,有一些替代方法既遵守了挣值原则,又能快速、有意义地用于商业项目。这里简要介绍一种名为 "项目进度跟踪器 "的方法。它使用一个简单的电子表格,对于敏捷项目和任何其他商业项目一样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Simplified, Meaningful, Progress Tracking for Business Projects
It is important for executives to understand the status of business projects in their areas of accountability, allowing timely decisions to be taken. But often this does not happen due to lack of, or misleading, reporting. One reason is shortcomings in the widely accepted textbook approach, referred to here as “classical” earned value management (CEVM). While such approaches are often used for construction projects, they do not work well for business projects. The reason is that CEVM works for projects whose scope activities are well understood, possible to estimate upfront, and change relatively little. Business projects seldom meet any of these criteria. This and other factors render CEVM impractical for almost all business projects. Project managers who try to use it for business projects usually find they are unable to obtain meaningful information, and thus blame themselves, whereas the problem is that CEVM is unsuitable for these kinds of projects. Fortunately, alternatives exist that honor the earned value principles and can be used quickly and meaningfully for business projects. One such approach, labeled project progress tracker, is outlined here. It uses a simple spreadsheet and works as well for an agile project as for any other business project.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Engineering Management Review
IEEE Engineering Management Review Business, Management and Accounting-Management of Technology and Innovation
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: Reprints articles from other publications of significant interest to members. The papers are aimed at those engaged in managing research, development, or engineering activities. Reprints make it possible for the readers to receive the best of today"s literature without having to subscribe to and read other periodicals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信