按急诊科业务特点划分的丁丙诺啡治疗实践差异。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Grant Comstock, Natalia Truszczynski, Sean S Michael, Jason Hoppe
{"title":"按急诊科业务特点划分的丁丙诺啡治疗实践差异。","authors":"Grant Comstock, Natalia Truszczynski, Sean S Michael, Jason Hoppe","doi":"10.5811/westjem.18019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We sought to describe emergency department (ED) buprenorphine treatment variability among EDs with varying operational characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with opioid use disorder discharged from 12 hospital-based EDs within a large healthcare system as a secondary data analysis of a quality improvement study. Primary outcome of interest was buprenorphine treatment rate. We described treatment rates between EDs, categorized by tertile of operational characteristics including annual census, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) admission rates, ED length of stay (LOS), and boarding time. Secondary outcomes were ED LOS and 30-day return rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 7,469 unique ED encounters for patients with opioid use disorder between January 2020-May 2021, of whom 759 (10.2%) were treated with buprenorphine. Buprenorphine treatment rates were higher in larger EDs and those with higher hospital and ICU admission rates. Emergency department LOS and 30-day ED return rate did not have consistent associations with buprenorphine treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rates of treatment with ED buprenorphine vary according to the operational characteristics of department. We did not observe a consistent negative relationship between buprenorphine treatment and operational metrics, as many feared. Additional funding and targeted resource allocation should be prioritized by departmental leaders to improve access to this evidence-based and life-saving intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 4","pages":"483-489"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11254146/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variability in Practice of Buprenorphine Treatment by Emergency Department Operational Characteristics.\",\"authors\":\"Grant Comstock, Natalia Truszczynski, Sean S Michael, Jason Hoppe\",\"doi\":\"10.5811/westjem.18019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We sought to describe emergency department (ED) buprenorphine treatment variability among EDs with varying operational characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with opioid use disorder discharged from 12 hospital-based EDs within a large healthcare system as a secondary data analysis of a quality improvement study. Primary outcome of interest was buprenorphine treatment rate. We described treatment rates between EDs, categorized by tertile of operational characteristics including annual census, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) admission rates, ED length of stay (LOS), and boarding time. Secondary outcomes were ED LOS and 30-day return rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 7,469 unique ED encounters for patients with opioid use disorder between January 2020-May 2021, of whom 759 (10.2%) were treated with buprenorphine. Buprenorphine treatment rates were higher in larger EDs and those with higher hospital and ICU admission rates. Emergency department LOS and 30-day ED return rate did not have consistent associations with buprenorphine treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rates of treatment with ED buprenorphine vary according to the operational characteristics of department. We did not observe a consistent negative relationship between buprenorphine treatment and operational metrics, as many feared. Additional funding and targeted resource allocation should be prioritized by departmental leaders to improve access to this evidence-based and life-saving intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"483-489\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11254146/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.18019\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.18019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:我们试图描述具有不同运行特征的急诊科(ED)丁丙诺啡治疗的差异性:我们对一家大型医疗保健系统内 12 家医院急诊科出院的阿片类药物使用障碍成人患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究,作为一项质量改进研究的辅助数据分析。研究的主要结果是丁丙诺啡治疗率。我们对急诊室之间的治疗率进行了描述,并根据运行特征(包括年人口普查、医院和重症监护室 (ICU) 入院率、急诊室住院时间 (LOS) 和住院时间)的三分位进行了分类。次要结果是急诊室的住院时间和 30 天返院率:2020年1月至2021年5月期间,共有7469名阿片类药物使用障碍患者在急诊室就诊,其中759人(10.2%)接受了丁丙诺啡治疗。在规模较大、入院率和重症监护室入院率较高的急诊科,丁丙诺啡治疗率更高。急诊科的住院时间和30天急诊科复诊率与丁丙诺啡治疗的关系并不一致:结论:急诊室丁丙诺啡治疗率因急诊室的运行特点而异。我们并没有像许多人担心的那样,观察到丁丙诺啡治疗与业务指标之间存在一致的负相关关系。各部门领导应优先考虑提供更多资金和有针对性的资源分配,以改善这一基于证据的救生干预措施的可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Variability in Practice of Buprenorphine Treatment by Emergency Department Operational Characteristics.

Introduction: We sought to describe emergency department (ED) buprenorphine treatment variability among EDs with varying operational characteristics.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with opioid use disorder discharged from 12 hospital-based EDs within a large healthcare system as a secondary data analysis of a quality improvement study. Primary outcome of interest was buprenorphine treatment rate. We described treatment rates between EDs, categorized by tertile of operational characteristics including annual census, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) admission rates, ED length of stay (LOS), and boarding time. Secondary outcomes were ED LOS and 30-day return rates.

Results: There were 7,469 unique ED encounters for patients with opioid use disorder between January 2020-May 2021, of whom 759 (10.2%) were treated with buprenorphine. Buprenorphine treatment rates were higher in larger EDs and those with higher hospital and ICU admission rates. Emergency department LOS and 30-day ED return rate did not have consistent associations with buprenorphine treatment.

Conclusion: Rates of treatment with ED buprenorphine vary according to the operational characteristics of department. We did not observe a consistent negative relationship between buprenorphine treatment and operational metrics, as many feared. Additional funding and targeted resource allocation should be prioritized by departmental leaders to improve access to this evidence-based and life-saving intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信