Buğra Tugertimur, Shaishav Datta, Paige Goote, Steven A Hanna, Matthew Morris, David Mattos, Richard G Reish
{"title":"乳突筋膜组织移植作为鼻整形术中的鼻尖伪装技术:软骨移植的可靠替代品。","authors":"Buğra Tugertimur, Shaishav Datta, Paige Goote, Steven A Hanna, Matthew Morris, David Mattos, Richard G Reish","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000011648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traditional rhinoplasty tip grafts often lead to visibility issues, prompting patients to seek revision surgery. The mastoid fascia tissue graft (MFTG) provides a natural-appearing alternative with an acceptable risk of complication. The MFTG remains less visible through the skin and helps camouflage and conceal tip irregularities. This study of 193 patients examines the MFTG's effectiveness in nasal tip refinement, evaluating revision and infection rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of MFTG use for nasal tip appearance during open rhinoplasty in the senior author's (R.G.R.) practice was conducted, covering the period from January of 2019 to June of 2022. Inclusion criteria encompassed open rhinoplasty cases using mastoid tissue for tip appearance with at least 12 months of follow-up. Among 2003 cases, 193 met these criteria and were evaluated for subsequent revision and infection rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average patient age was 34.2 years (175 female patients and 18 male patients). Primary rhinoplasty was performed in 113 patients, with 80 receiving revision operations. The average follow-up was 14.8 months. Six patients (3.1%) overall needed extended antibiotics, including 1 primary rhinoplasty patient (0.9%) and 5 secondary rhinoplasty patients (6.3%). Overall, revision rhinoplasty was required in 6 patients (3.1%) (1 primary patient [0.9%] and 5 secondary rhinoplasty patients [6.3%]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MFTG use for an aesthetically pleasing nasal tip appearance is a safe, convenient, and effective technique for camouflaging and concealing nasal tip contour irregularities in both primary and revision rhinoplasty. Use of the MTFG is associated with minimal morbidity.</p><p><strong>Clinical question/level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic, IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":"255-262"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mastoid Fascia Tissue Graft as a Tip Camouflage Technique in Rhinoplasty: A Reliable Alternative to Soft Cartilage Grafts.\",\"authors\":\"Buğra Tugertimur, Shaishav Datta, Paige Goote, Steven A Hanna, Matthew Morris, David Mattos, Richard G Reish\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PRS.0000000000011648\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traditional rhinoplasty tip grafts often lead to visibility issues, prompting patients to seek revision surgery. The mastoid fascia tissue graft (MFTG) provides a natural-appearing alternative with an acceptable risk of complication. The MFTG remains less visible through the skin and helps camouflage and conceal tip irregularities. This study of 193 patients examines the MFTG's effectiveness in nasal tip refinement, evaluating revision and infection rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of MFTG use for nasal tip appearance during open rhinoplasty in the senior author's (R.G.R.) practice was conducted, covering the period from January of 2019 to June of 2022. Inclusion criteria encompassed open rhinoplasty cases using mastoid tissue for tip appearance with at least 12 months of follow-up. Among 2003 cases, 193 met these criteria and were evaluated for subsequent revision and infection rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average patient age was 34.2 years (175 female patients and 18 male patients). Primary rhinoplasty was performed in 113 patients, with 80 receiving revision operations. The average follow-up was 14.8 months. Six patients (3.1%) overall needed extended antibiotics, including 1 primary rhinoplasty patient (0.9%) and 5 secondary rhinoplasty patients (6.3%). Overall, revision rhinoplasty was required in 6 patients (3.1%) (1 primary patient [0.9%] and 5 secondary rhinoplasty patients [6.3%]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MFTG use for an aesthetically pleasing nasal tip appearance is a safe, convenient, and effective technique for camouflaging and concealing nasal tip contour irregularities in both primary and revision rhinoplasty. Use of the MTFG is associated with minimal morbidity.</p><p><strong>Clinical question/level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic, IV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic and reconstructive surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"255-262\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic and reconstructive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000011648\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000011648","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mastoid Fascia Tissue Graft as a Tip Camouflage Technique in Rhinoplasty: A Reliable Alternative to Soft Cartilage Grafts.
Background: Traditional rhinoplasty tip grafts often lead to visibility issues, prompting patients to seek revision surgery. The mastoid fascia tissue graft (MFTG) provides a natural-appearing alternative with an acceptable risk of complication. The MFTG remains less visible through the skin and helps camouflage and conceal tip irregularities. This study of 193 patients examines the MFTG's effectiveness in nasal tip refinement, evaluating revision and infection rates.
Methods: A retrospective analysis of MFTG use for nasal tip appearance during open rhinoplasty in the senior author's (R.G.R.) practice was conducted, covering the period from January of 2019 to June of 2022. Inclusion criteria encompassed open rhinoplasty cases using mastoid tissue for tip appearance with at least 12 months of follow-up. Among 2003 cases, 193 met these criteria and were evaluated for subsequent revision and infection rates.
Results: The average patient age was 34.2 years (175 female patients and 18 male patients). Primary rhinoplasty was performed in 113 patients, with 80 receiving revision operations. The average follow-up was 14.8 months. Six patients (3.1%) overall needed extended antibiotics, including 1 primary rhinoplasty patient (0.9%) and 5 secondary rhinoplasty patients (6.3%). Overall, revision rhinoplasty was required in 6 patients (3.1%) (1 primary patient [0.9%] and 5 secondary rhinoplasty patients [6.3%]).
Conclusions: MFTG use for an aesthetically pleasing nasal tip appearance is a safe, convenient, and effective technique for camouflaging and concealing nasal tip contour irregularities in both primary and revision rhinoplasty. Use of the MTFG is associated with minimal morbidity.
Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, IV.
期刊介绍:
For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.