治疗自残的关系方法(RELATE):针对自残成人的认知分析疗法与常规治疗的可行性随机对照试验研究方案。

IF 1.5 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Peter James Taylor, Isabel Adeyemi, Katie Marlow, Sarah Cottam, Zerena Airnes, Samantha Hartley, Victoria Howells, Barnaby D Dunn, Rachel A Elliott, Mark Hann, Cameron Latham, Catherine Robinson, Clive Turpin, Stephen Kellett
{"title":"治疗自残的关系方法(RELATE):针对自残成人的认知分析疗法与常规治疗的可行性随机对照试验研究方案。","authors":"Peter James Taylor, Isabel Adeyemi, Katie Marlow, Sarah Cottam, Zerena Airnes, Samantha Hartley, Victoria Howells, Barnaby D Dunn, Rachel A Elliott, Mark Hann, Cameron Latham, Catherine Robinson, Clive Turpin, Stephen Kellett","doi":"10.1186/s40814-024-01526-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Self-harm is a prevalent behaviour that has a major detrimental impact on a person's life. Psychological therapies have the potential to help, but evidence of effective interventions remains limited. Access and acceptability of interventions can also be a significant challenge, with individuals either being unable to access help or having to endure long waiting lists. Cognitive analytic therapy (CAT) is a time-limited and relationally-focused psychotherapy that may provide a valuable treatment option for people who self-harm. This protocol outlines the methodology for the first feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT) of CAT for adults that self-harm. The trial will aim to determine the feasibility, acceptability and safety of undertaking larger-scale evaluations of CAT for self-harm within an RCT context.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An RCT design with 1:1 allocation to CAT plus treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU alone. Participants will be adult outpatients with three or more instances of self-harm in the past year (target sample of n = 60). CAT will be 8 one-to-one weekly 60-min sessions plus a follow-up session up to 8 weeks after the last session. Assessments will occur at baseline, 12 weeks and 18 weeks after randomisation. Qualitative interviews with participants will gain insights into the feasibility and acceptability of CAT. Feasibility outcomes will be judged against progression criteria.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>CAT may be an effective and accessible treatment option for people who self-harm, providing a more relationally orientated alternative to more behavioural therapies. The proposed feasibility RCT is an important first step in evaluating CAT as a treatment for self-harm.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The trial was pre-registered (21/10/22) on ISR CTN (ISRCTN code: ISRCTN75661422).</p>","PeriodicalId":20176,"journal":{"name":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","volume":"10 1","pages":"101"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11256374/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Relational Approach to Treating Self-Harm (RELATE): study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial study of cognitive analytic therapy for adults who self-harm versus treatment at usual.\",\"authors\":\"Peter James Taylor, Isabel Adeyemi, Katie Marlow, Sarah Cottam, Zerena Airnes, Samantha Hartley, Victoria Howells, Barnaby D Dunn, Rachel A Elliott, Mark Hann, Cameron Latham, Catherine Robinson, Clive Turpin, Stephen Kellett\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40814-024-01526-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Self-harm is a prevalent behaviour that has a major detrimental impact on a person's life. Psychological therapies have the potential to help, but evidence of effective interventions remains limited. Access and acceptability of interventions can also be a significant challenge, with individuals either being unable to access help or having to endure long waiting lists. Cognitive analytic therapy (CAT) is a time-limited and relationally-focused psychotherapy that may provide a valuable treatment option for people who self-harm. This protocol outlines the methodology for the first feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT) of CAT for adults that self-harm. The trial will aim to determine the feasibility, acceptability and safety of undertaking larger-scale evaluations of CAT for self-harm within an RCT context.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An RCT design with 1:1 allocation to CAT plus treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU alone. Participants will be adult outpatients with three or more instances of self-harm in the past year (target sample of n = 60). CAT will be 8 one-to-one weekly 60-min sessions plus a follow-up session up to 8 weeks after the last session. Assessments will occur at baseline, 12 weeks and 18 weeks after randomisation. Qualitative interviews with participants will gain insights into the feasibility and acceptability of CAT. Feasibility outcomes will be judged against progression criteria.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>CAT may be an effective and accessible treatment option for people who self-harm, providing a more relationally orientated alternative to more behavioural therapies. The proposed feasibility RCT is an important first step in evaluating CAT as a treatment for self-harm.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The trial was pre-registered (21/10/22) on ISR CTN (ISRCTN code: ISRCTN75661422).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pilot and Feasibility Studies\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11256374/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pilot and Feasibility Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-024-01526-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-024-01526-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:自残是一种普遍存在的行为,对人的一生有着重大的不利影响。心理疗法有可能提供帮助,但有效干预的证据仍然有限。干预措施的可及性和可接受性也是一个重大挑战,患者要么无法获得帮助,要么不得不忍受漫长的等待。认知分析疗法(CAT)是一种有时间限制、以关系为中心的心理疗法,可以为自我伤害者提供有价值的治疗选择。本协议概述了针对有自我伤害行为的成年人开展的首个认知分析疗法可行性随机对照试验(RCT)的方法。该试验旨在确定在 RCT 背景下对 CAT 治疗自残进行更大规模评估的可行性、可接受性和安全性:方法:采用 RCT 设计,1:1 分配到 CAT 加常规治疗(TAU)或单用 TAU。参与者将是在过去一年中有过三次或三次以上自残行为的成年门诊患者(目标样本 n = 60)。CAT每周进行8次一对一治疗,每次60分钟,并在最后一次治疗后8周内进行一次随访。评估将在随机分组后的基线、12 周和 18 周进行。对参与者的定性访谈将深入了解 CAT 的可行性和可接受性。可行性结果将根据进展标准进行评判:讨论:对于自残者来说,CAT 可能是一种有效且容易接受的治疗方法,它提供了一种以关系为导向的治疗方法,可替代更多的行为疗法。拟议的可行性研究试验是评估 CAT 作为自残治疗方法的重要第一步:该试验已在 ISR CTN 上进行了预注册(21/10/22)(ISRCTN 代码:ISRCTN75661422)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Relational Approach to Treating Self-Harm (RELATE): study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial study of cognitive analytic therapy for adults who self-harm versus treatment at usual.

Background: Self-harm is a prevalent behaviour that has a major detrimental impact on a person's life. Psychological therapies have the potential to help, but evidence of effective interventions remains limited. Access and acceptability of interventions can also be a significant challenge, with individuals either being unable to access help or having to endure long waiting lists. Cognitive analytic therapy (CAT) is a time-limited and relationally-focused psychotherapy that may provide a valuable treatment option for people who self-harm. This protocol outlines the methodology for the first feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT) of CAT for adults that self-harm. The trial will aim to determine the feasibility, acceptability and safety of undertaking larger-scale evaluations of CAT for self-harm within an RCT context.

Method: An RCT design with 1:1 allocation to CAT plus treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU alone. Participants will be adult outpatients with three or more instances of self-harm in the past year (target sample of n = 60). CAT will be 8 one-to-one weekly 60-min sessions plus a follow-up session up to 8 weeks after the last session. Assessments will occur at baseline, 12 weeks and 18 weeks after randomisation. Qualitative interviews with participants will gain insights into the feasibility and acceptability of CAT. Feasibility outcomes will be judged against progression criteria.

Discussion: CAT may be an effective and accessible treatment option for people who self-harm, providing a more relationally orientated alternative to more behavioural therapies. The proposed feasibility RCT is an important first step in evaluating CAT as a treatment for self-harm.

Trial registration: The trial was pre-registered (21/10/22) on ISR CTN (ISRCTN code: ISRCTN75661422).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Pilot and Feasibility Studies Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
241
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Pilot and Feasibility Studies encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of pilot and feasibility studies in biomedicine. The journal publishes research articles that are intended to directly influence future clinical trials or large scale observational studies, as well as protocols, commentaries and methodology articles. The journal also ensures that the results of all well-conducted, peer-reviewed, pilot and feasibility studies are published, regardless of outcome or significance of findings. Pilot and feasibility studies are increasingly conducted prior to a full randomized controlled trial. However, these studies often lack clear objectives, many remain unpublished, and there is confusion over the meanings of the words “pilot” and “feasibility”. Pilot and Feasibility Studies provides a forum for discussion around this key aspect of the scientific process, and seeks to ensure that these studies are published, so as to complete the publication thread for clinical research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信