Michael Colin Mowrer, Lisa Lima, Rohit Nair, Xilong Li, Hitesh Sandhu, Brian Bridges, Ryan P Barbaro, Saleh Bhar, Raymond Nkwantabisa, Saad Ghafoor, Agnes Reschke, Taylor Olson, Matthew P Malone, Neel Shah, Matt S Zinter, Jon Gehlbach, Laura Hollinger, Briana L Scott, Reut Kassif Lerner, Thomas V Brogan, Lakshmi Raman, Renee M Potera
{"title":"使用体外膜氧合的小儿血液病和肿瘤患者:2009-2021年多中心、回顾性队列的结果。","authors":"Michael Colin Mowrer, Lisa Lima, Rohit Nair, Xilong Li, Hitesh Sandhu, Brian Bridges, Ryan P Barbaro, Saleh Bhar, Raymond Nkwantabisa, Saad Ghafoor, Agnes Reschke, Taylor Olson, Matthew P Malone, Neel Shah, Matt S Zinter, Jon Gehlbach, Laura Hollinger, Briana L Scott, Reut Kassif Lerner, Thomas V Brogan, Lakshmi Raman, Renee M Potera","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe characteristics associated with survival for pediatric patients with an oncologic diagnosis or hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicenter, retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Sixteen PICUs in the United States and Israel.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>We included patients aged younger than 19 years with an oncologic diagnosis or HCT who required ECMO support between 2009 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>A total of 149 patients were included in the study cohort. There were 118 patients with an oncologic diagnosis and 31 that received HCT. The indications for ECMO were respiratory failure (46%), combined respiratory and cardiac failure (28%), and cardiac failure (25%). Venovenous (V-V) ECMO was used in 45% of patients, with 53% of patients being placed on venoarterial (V-A) ECMO. For oncologic and HCT groups, survival to ECMO decannulation was 52% (62/118) and 64% (20/31), and survival to hospital discharge was 36% (43/118) and 42% (13/31), respectively. After adjusting for other factors, requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation was associated with greater odds ratio of mortality (3.0 [95% CI, 1.2-7.7]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Survival to ECMO decannulation of pediatric oncologic and HCT patients in this study was 52-64%, depending upon diagnosis. However, survival to hospital discharge remains poor. Future research should prioritize understanding factors contributing to this survival gap within these patient populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Outcomes in a Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort, 2009-2021.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Colin Mowrer, Lisa Lima, Rohit Nair, Xilong Li, Hitesh Sandhu, Brian Bridges, Ryan P Barbaro, Saleh Bhar, Raymond Nkwantabisa, Saad Ghafoor, Agnes Reschke, Taylor Olson, Matthew P Malone, Neel Shah, Matt S Zinter, Jon Gehlbach, Laura Hollinger, Briana L Scott, Reut Kassif Lerner, Thomas V Brogan, Lakshmi Raman, Renee M Potera\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003584\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe characteristics associated with survival for pediatric patients with an oncologic diagnosis or hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicenter, retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Sixteen PICUs in the United States and Israel.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>We included patients aged younger than 19 years with an oncologic diagnosis or HCT who required ECMO support between 2009 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>A total of 149 patients were included in the study cohort. There were 118 patients with an oncologic diagnosis and 31 that received HCT. The indications for ECMO were respiratory failure (46%), combined respiratory and cardiac failure (28%), and cardiac failure (25%). Venovenous (V-V) ECMO was used in 45% of patients, with 53% of patients being placed on venoarterial (V-A) ECMO. For oncologic and HCT groups, survival to ECMO decannulation was 52% (62/118) and 64% (20/31), and survival to hospital discharge was 36% (43/118) and 42% (13/31), respectively. After adjusting for other factors, requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation was associated with greater odds ratio of mortality (3.0 [95% CI, 1.2-7.7]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Survival to ECMO decannulation of pediatric oncologic and HCT patients in this study was 52-64%, depending upon diagnosis. However, survival to hospital discharge remains poor. Future research should prioritize understanding factors contributing to this survival gap within these patient populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003584\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003584","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Outcomes in a Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort, 2009-2021.
Objective: To describe characteristics associated with survival for pediatric patients with an oncologic diagnosis or hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).
Design: Multicenter, retrospective study.
Setting: Sixteen PICUs in the United States and Israel.
Patients: We included patients aged younger than 19 years with an oncologic diagnosis or HCT who required ECMO support between 2009 and 2021.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and main results: A total of 149 patients were included in the study cohort. There were 118 patients with an oncologic diagnosis and 31 that received HCT. The indications for ECMO were respiratory failure (46%), combined respiratory and cardiac failure (28%), and cardiac failure (25%). Venovenous (V-V) ECMO was used in 45% of patients, with 53% of patients being placed on venoarterial (V-A) ECMO. For oncologic and HCT groups, survival to ECMO decannulation was 52% (62/118) and 64% (20/31), and survival to hospital discharge was 36% (43/118) and 42% (13/31), respectively. After adjusting for other factors, requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation was associated with greater odds ratio of mortality (3.0 [95% CI, 1.2-7.7]).
Conclusions: Survival to ECMO decannulation of pediatric oncologic and HCT patients in this study was 52-64%, depending upon diagnosis. However, survival to hospital discharge remains poor. Future research should prioritize understanding factors contributing to this survival gap within these patient populations.
期刊介绍:
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine is written for the entire critical care team: pediatricians, neonatologists, respiratory therapists, nurses, and others who deal with pediatric patients who are critically ill or injured. International in scope, with editorial board members and contributors from around the world, the Journal includes a full range of scientific content, including clinical articles, scientific investigations, solicited reviews, and abstracts from pediatric critical care meetings. Additionally, the Journal includes abstracts of selected articles published in Chinese, French, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese, and Spanish translations - making news of advances in the field available to pediatric and neonatal intensive care practitioners worldwide.