急性疼痛患者大剂量阿片类药物处方:评估美国各州阿片类药物政策的影响》(High-Dose Opioid Prescribing in Individual with Acute Pain: Assessing the Effects of US State Opioid Policies.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of General Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-19 DOI:10.1007/s11606-024-08947-9
Ashley C Bradford, Thuy Nguyen, Lucy Schulson, Andrew Dick, Sumedha Gupta, Kosali Simon, Bradley D Stein
{"title":"急性疼痛患者大剂量阿片类药物处方:评估美国各州阿片类药物政策的影响》(High-Dose Opioid Prescribing in Individual with Acute Pain: Assessing the Effects of US State Opioid Policies.","authors":"Ashley C Bradford, Thuy Nguyen, Lucy Schulson, Andrew Dick, Sumedha Gupta, Kosali Simon, Bradley D Stein","doi":"10.1007/s11606-024-08947-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>How state opioid policy environments with multiple concurrent policies affect opioid prescribing to individuals with acute pain is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine how prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs), pain management clinic regulations, initial prescription duration limits, and mandatory continued medical education affected total and high-dose prescribing.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A county-level multiple-policy difference-in-difference event study framework.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>A total of 2,425,643 individuals in a large national commercial insurance deidentified claims database (aged 12-64 years) with acute pain diagnoses and opioid prescriptions from 2007 to 2019.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>The total number of acute pain opioid treatment episodes and number of episodes containing high-dose (> 90 morphine equivalent daily dosage (MEDD)) prescriptions.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Approximately 7.5% of acute pain episodes were categorized as high-dose episodes. Prescription duration limits were associated with increases in the number of total episodes; no other policy was found to have a significant impact. Beginning five quarters after implementation, counties in states with pain management clinic regulations experienced a sustained 50% relative decline in the number of episodes containing > 90 MEDD prescriptions (95 CIs: (Q5: - 0.506, - 0.144; Q12: - 1.000, - 0.290)). Mandated continuing medical education regarding the treatment of pain was associated with a 50-75% relative increase in number of high-dose episodes following the first year-and-a-half of enactment (95 CIs: (Q7: 0.351, 0.869; Q12: 0.413, 1.107)). Initial prescription duration limits were associated with an initial relative reduction of 25% in high-dose prescribing, with the effect increasing over time (95 CI: (Q12: - 0.967, - 0.335). There was no evidence that PDMPs affected high-dose opioids dispensed to individuals with acute pain. Other high-risk prescribing indicators were explored as well; no consistent policy impacts were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>State opioid policies may have differential effects on high-dose opioid dispensing in individuals with acute pain. Policymakers should consider effectiveness of individual policies in the presence of other opioid policies to address the ongoing opioid crisis.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2689-2697"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11534911/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High-Dose Opioid Prescribing in Individuals with Acute Pain: Assessing the Effects of US State Opioid Policies.\",\"authors\":\"Ashley C Bradford, Thuy Nguyen, Lucy Schulson, Andrew Dick, Sumedha Gupta, Kosali Simon, Bradley D Stein\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11606-024-08947-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>How state opioid policy environments with multiple concurrent policies affect opioid prescribing to individuals with acute pain is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine how prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs), pain management clinic regulations, initial prescription duration limits, and mandatory continued medical education affected total and high-dose prescribing.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A county-level multiple-policy difference-in-difference event study framework.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>A total of 2,425,643 individuals in a large national commercial insurance deidentified claims database (aged 12-64 years) with acute pain diagnoses and opioid prescriptions from 2007 to 2019.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>The total number of acute pain opioid treatment episodes and number of episodes containing high-dose (> 90 morphine equivalent daily dosage (MEDD)) prescriptions.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Approximately 7.5% of acute pain episodes were categorized as high-dose episodes. Prescription duration limits were associated with increases in the number of total episodes; no other policy was found to have a significant impact. Beginning five quarters after implementation, counties in states with pain management clinic regulations experienced a sustained 50% relative decline in the number of episodes containing > 90 MEDD prescriptions (95 CIs: (Q5: - 0.506, - 0.144; Q12: - 1.000, - 0.290)). Mandated continuing medical education regarding the treatment of pain was associated with a 50-75% relative increase in number of high-dose episodes following the first year-and-a-half of enactment (95 CIs: (Q7: 0.351, 0.869; Q12: 0.413, 1.107)). Initial prescription duration limits were associated with an initial relative reduction of 25% in high-dose prescribing, with the effect increasing over time (95 CI: (Q12: - 0.967, - 0.335). There was no evidence that PDMPs affected high-dose opioids dispensed to individuals with acute pain. Other high-risk prescribing indicators were explored as well; no consistent policy impacts were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>State opioid policies may have differential effects on high-dose opioid dispensing in individuals with acute pain. Policymakers should consider effectiveness of individual policies in the presence of other opioid policies to address the ongoing opioid crisis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2689-2697\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11534911/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-08947-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-08947-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前尚不清楚各州同时实施多种阿片类药物政策的环境如何影响急性疼痛患者的阿片类药物处方:研究处方药监控项目(PDMP)、疼痛管理诊所规定、初始处方持续时间限制以及强制性继续医学教育如何影响总处方量和大剂量处方量:设计:县级多政策差异事件研究框架:大型全国性商业保险去身份化理赔数据库中共计 2425643 名个人(年龄在 12-64 岁之间)在 2007 年至 2019 年期间有急性疼痛诊断和阿片类药物处方:主要衡量指标:急性疼痛阿片类药物治疗发作的总数和包含高剂量(> 90 吗啡当量日剂量 (MEDD))处方的发作数:约 7.5% 的急性疼痛发作被归类为高剂量发作。处方持续时间限制与总发作次数的增加有关;其他政策均未产生显著影响。从实施五个季度后开始,在有疼痛管理诊所规定的州内,包含 > 90 个 MEDD 处方的发病次数相对下降了 50%(95 CIs:(Q5:- 0.506,- 0.144;Q12:- 1.000,- 0.290))。有关疼痛治疗的强制性继续医学教育与颁布后一年半内高剂量发作次数相对增加 50-75% 相关(95 CIs:(Q7:0.351,0.869;Q12:0.413,1.107))。最初的处方持续时间限制与大剂量处方最初相对减少 25% 有关,随着时间的推移,效果会逐渐增强(95 CI:(Q12:- 0.967,- 0.335))。没有证据表明 PDMP 影响了向急性疼痛患者发放的大剂量阿片类药物。研究还探讨了其他高风险处方指标,但未发现一致的政策影响:结论:各州的阿片类药物政策可能会对急性疼痛患者大剂量阿片类药物的分配产生不同的影响。政策制定者应在制定其他阿片类药物政策时考虑个别政策的有效性,以应对持续的阿片类药物危机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

High-Dose Opioid Prescribing in Individuals with Acute Pain: Assessing the Effects of US State Opioid Policies.

High-Dose Opioid Prescribing in Individuals with Acute Pain: Assessing the Effects of US State Opioid Policies.

Background: How state opioid policy environments with multiple concurrent policies affect opioid prescribing to individuals with acute pain is unknown.

Objective: To examine how prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs), pain management clinic regulations, initial prescription duration limits, and mandatory continued medical education affected total and high-dose prescribing.

Design: A county-level multiple-policy difference-in-difference event study framework.

Subjects: A total of 2,425,643 individuals in a large national commercial insurance deidentified claims database (aged 12-64 years) with acute pain diagnoses and opioid prescriptions from 2007 to 2019.

Main measures: The total number of acute pain opioid treatment episodes and number of episodes containing high-dose (> 90 morphine equivalent daily dosage (MEDD)) prescriptions.

Key results: Approximately 7.5% of acute pain episodes were categorized as high-dose episodes. Prescription duration limits were associated with increases in the number of total episodes; no other policy was found to have a significant impact. Beginning five quarters after implementation, counties in states with pain management clinic regulations experienced a sustained 50% relative decline in the number of episodes containing > 90 MEDD prescriptions (95 CIs: (Q5: - 0.506, - 0.144; Q12: - 1.000, - 0.290)). Mandated continuing medical education regarding the treatment of pain was associated with a 50-75% relative increase in number of high-dose episodes following the first year-and-a-half of enactment (95 CIs: (Q7: 0.351, 0.869; Q12: 0.413, 1.107)). Initial prescription duration limits were associated with an initial relative reduction of 25% in high-dose prescribing, with the effect increasing over time (95 CI: (Q12: - 0.967, - 0.335). There was no evidence that PDMPs affected high-dose opioids dispensed to individuals with acute pain. Other high-risk prescribing indicators were explored as well; no consistent policy impacts were found.

Conclusions: State opioid policies may have differential effects on high-dose opioid dispensing in individuals with acute pain. Policymakers should consider effectiveness of individual policies in the presence of other opioid policies to address the ongoing opioid crisis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信