人工智能在矫形外科中的应用:使用文本到图像生成器分析性别和种族多样性。

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Mary Morcos, Jessica Duggan, Jason Young, Shaina A Lipa
{"title":"人工智能在矫形外科中的应用:使用文本到图像生成器分析性别和种族多样性。","authors":"Mary Morcos, Jessica Duggan, Jason Young, Shaina A Lipa","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The increasing accessibility of artificial intelligence (AI) text-to-image generators offers a novel avenue for exploring societal perceptions. The present study assessed AI-generated images to examine the representation of gender and racial diversity among orthopaedic surgeons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five prominent text-to-image generators (DALL·E 2, Runway, Midjourney, ImagineAI, and JasperArt) were utilized to create images for the search queries \"Orthopedic Surgeon,\" \"Orthopedic Surgeon's Face,\" and \"Portrait of an Orthopedic Surgeon.\" Each query produced 80 images, resulting in a total of 240 images per generator. Two independent reviewers categorized race, sex, and age in each image, with a third reviewer resolving discrepancies. Images with incomplete or multiple faces were excluded. The demographic proportions (sex, race, and age) of the AI-generated images were then compared with those of the 2018 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) census.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our examination across all AI platforms, 82.8% of the images depicted surgeons as White, 12.3% as Asian, 4.1% as Black, and 0.75% as other; 94.5% of images were men; and a majority (64.4%) appeared ≥50 years old. DALL·E 2 exhibited significantly increased diversity in representation of both women and non-White surgeons compared with the AAOS census, whereas Midjourney, Runway, and ImagineAI exhibited significantly decreased representation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study highlighted distortions in AI portrayal of orthopaedic surgeon diversity, influencing public perceptions and potentially reinforcing disparities. DALL·E 2 and JasperArt show encouraging diversity, but limitations persist in other generators. Future research should explore strategies for improving AI to promote a more inclusive and accurate representation of the evolving demographics of orthopaedic surgery, mitigating biases related to race and gender.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>This study is clinically relevant as it investigates the accuracy of AI-generated images in depicting diversity among orthopaedic surgeons. The findings reveal significant discrepancies in representation by race and gender, which could impact societal perceptions and exacerbate existing disparities in health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":"2278-2285"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial Intelligence Portrayals in Orthopaedic Surgery: An Analysis of Gender and Racial Diversity Using Text-to-Image Generators.\",\"authors\":\"Mary Morcos, Jessica Duggan, Jason Young, Shaina A Lipa\",\"doi\":\"10.2106/JBJS.24.00150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The increasing accessibility of artificial intelligence (AI) text-to-image generators offers a novel avenue for exploring societal perceptions. The present study assessed AI-generated images to examine the representation of gender and racial diversity among orthopaedic surgeons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five prominent text-to-image generators (DALL·E 2, Runway, Midjourney, ImagineAI, and JasperArt) were utilized to create images for the search queries \\\"Orthopedic Surgeon,\\\" \\\"Orthopedic Surgeon's Face,\\\" and \\\"Portrait of an Orthopedic Surgeon.\\\" Each query produced 80 images, resulting in a total of 240 images per generator. Two independent reviewers categorized race, sex, and age in each image, with a third reviewer resolving discrepancies. Images with incomplete or multiple faces were excluded. The demographic proportions (sex, race, and age) of the AI-generated images were then compared with those of the 2018 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) census.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our examination across all AI platforms, 82.8% of the images depicted surgeons as White, 12.3% as Asian, 4.1% as Black, and 0.75% as other; 94.5% of images were men; and a majority (64.4%) appeared ≥50 years old. DALL·E 2 exhibited significantly increased diversity in representation of both women and non-White surgeons compared with the AAOS census, whereas Midjourney, Runway, and ImagineAI exhibited significantly decreased representation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study highlighted distortions in AI portrayal of orthopaedic surgeon diversity, influencing public perceptions and potentially reinforcing disparities. DALL·E 2 and JasperArt show encouraging diversity, but limitations persist in other generators. Future research should explore strategies for improving AI to promote a more inclusive and accurate representation of the evolving demographics of orthopaedic surgery, mitigating biases related to race and gender.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>This study is clinically relevant as it investigates the accuracy of AI-generated images in depicting diversity among orthopaedic surgeons. The findings reveal significant discrepancies in representation by race and gender, which could impact societal perceptions and exacerbate existing disparities in health care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2278-2285\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.00150\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.00150","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:人工智能(AI)文本到图像生成器的普及为探索社会认知提供了一条新途径。本研究对人工智能生成的图像进行了评估,以研究矫形外科医生中性别和种族多样性的代表性:方法:利用五种著名的文本到图像生成器(DALL-E 2、Runway、Midjourney、ImagineAI 和 JasperArt)为搜索查询 "矫形外科医生"、"矫形外科医生的脸 "和 "矫形外科医生的肖像 "创建图像。每个查询产生 80 张图片,因此每个生成器共生成 240 张图片。两名独立审核员对每张图片的种族、性别和年龄进行分类,第三名审核员负责解决不一致的地方。面孔不完整或有多张面孔的图像被排除在外。然后将人工智能生成图像的人口比例(性别、种族和年龄)与 2018 年美国骨科医师学会(AAOS)普查的人口比例进行比较:在我们对所有人工智能平台进行的检查中,82.8%的图像将外科医生描述为白人,12.3%为亚裔,4.1%为黑人,0.75%为其他族裔;94.5%的图像为男性;大多数(64.4%)年龄≥50 岁。与 AAOS 普查相比,DALL-E 2 在女性和非白人外科医生的代表性方面表现出明显的多样性,而 Midjourney、Runway 和 ImagineAI 则表现出明显的代表性下降:本研究强调了人工智能对矫形外科医生多样性描述的失真,这影响了公众的看法,并有可能强化差异。DALL-E 2》和《JasperArt》显示出令人鼓舞的多样性,但其他生成器仍存在局限性。未来的研究应探索改进人工智能的策略,以促进人工智能更包容、更准确地反映骨科手术不断变化的人口构成,减少与种族和性别有关的偏见:本研究具有临床相关性,因为它调查了人工智能生成的图像在描述骨科外科医生多样性方面的准确性。研究结果表明,种族和性别的代表性存在明显差异,这可能会影响社会观念,并加剧医疗保健领域的现有差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial Intelligence Portrayals in Orthopaedic Surgery: An Analysis of Gender and Racial Diversity Using Text-to-Image Generators.

Background: The increasing accessibility of artificial intelligence (AI) text-to-image generators offers a novel avenue for exploring societal perceptions. The present study assessed AI-generated images to examine the representation of gender and racial diversity among orthopaedic surgeons.

Methods: Five prominent text-to-image generators (DALL·E 2, Runway, Midjourney, ImagineAI, and JasperArt) were utilized to create images for the search queries "Orthopedic Surgeon," "Orthopedic Surgeon's Face," and "Portrait of an Orthopedic Surgeon." Each query produced 80 images, resulting in a total of 240 images per generator. Two independent reviewers categorized race, sex, and age in each image, with a third reviewer resolving discrepancies. Images with incomplete or multiple faces were excluded. The demographic proportions (sex, race, and age) of the AI-generated images were then compared with those of the 2018 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) census.

Results: In our examination across all AI platforms, 82.8% of the images depicted surgeons as White, 12.3% as Asian, 4.1% as Black, and 0.75% as other; 94.5% of images were men; and a majority (64.4%) appeared ≥50 years old. DALL·E 2 exhibited significantly increased diversity in representation of both women and non-White surgeons compared with the AAOS census, whereas Midjourney, Runway, and ImagineAI exhibited significantly decreased representation.

Conclusions: The present study highlighted distortions in AI portrayal of orthopaedic surgeon diversity, influencing public perceptions and potentially reinforcing disparities. DALL·E 2 and JasperArt show encouraging diversity, but limitations persist in other generators. Future research should explore strategies for improving AI to promote a more inclusive and accurate representation of the evolving demographics of orthopaedic surgery, mitigating biases related to race and gender.

Clinical relevance: This study is clinically relevant as it investigates the accuracy of AI-generated images in depicting diversity among orthopaedic surgeons. The findings reveal significant discrepancies in representation by race and gender, which could impact societal perceptions and exacerbate existing disparities in health care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.50%
发文量
660
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (JBJS) has been the most valued source of information for orthopaedic surgeons and researchers for over 125 years and is the gold standard in peer-reviewed scientific information in the field. A core journal and essential reading for general as well as specialist orthopaedic surgeons worldwide, The Journal publishes evidence-based research to enhance the quality of care for orthopaedic patients. Standards of excellence and high quality are maintained in everything we do, from the science of the content published to the customer service we provide. JBJS is an independent, non-profit journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信