格雷姆克家族:Kerri K. Greenridge 著的《一个美国家庭的奴隶制遗产》(评论)

IF 0.8 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
Bonnie Laughlin-Schultz
{"title":"格雷姆克家族:Kerri K. Greenridge 著的《一个美国家庭的奴隶制遗产》(评论)","authors":"Bonnie Laughlin-Schultz","doi":"10.1353/soh.2024.a932567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>The Grimkes: The Legacy of Slavery in an American Family</em> by Kerri K. Greenridge <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Bonnie Laughlin-Schultz </li> </ul> <em>The Grimkes: The Legacy of Slavery in an American Family</em>. By Kerri K. Greenridge. (New York: Liveright, 2023. Pp. xxviii, 404. Paper, $21.99, ISBN 978-1-324-09454-8; cloth, $32.50, ISBN 978-1-324-09084-7.) <p>In her carefully argued family biography <em>The Grimkes: The Legacy of Slavery in an American Family</em>, Kerri K. Greenridge details the history of the Grimke sisters—Angelina Grimke and Sarah Moore Grimke—and the several generations that followed, those born from Angelina Grimke’s marriage to famed abolitionist Theodore Dwight Weld and those born to an enslaved woman, Nancy Weston, and her abuser (and possible rapist) Henry Grimke. The work opens and closes with details of queer writer Angelina (“Nana”) Weld Grimke, granddaughter of Nancy Weston and Henry Grimke, whose life, like all others in the family, was shaped by race, the legacy of slavery, and her link to the Grimke name.</p> <p>Greenridge’s engrossing narrative centers three themes. First, she traces what she describes as the multigenerational attempt by white reformers (and the Grimke-Welds, specifically) to disavow their “complicity in America’s racial project” (p. xxvi). She highlights the children of Henry and Nancy, too, as in a denial of sorts, highlighting Black elites’ “superficialities” and their classist belief in the politics of respectability in the post–Civil War world (p. xxvii). Third—and possibly most important for those scholars reading this book for intersections with recent abolitionist historiography—she describes “the limits of interracial alliances” (p. xxvii).</p> <p>Greenridge revisits the oft-told story of the power that the Grimke sisters (and Weld) held in late-1830s America as they lectured widely and authored powerful tracts in addition to their work on <em>American Slavery as It Is: Testimony of a Thousand Witnesses</em> (1839). The many narrative choices made by Greenridge to juxtapose the lives of the white Grimkes in Philadelphia and New York with those of their Black neighbors, such as James Forten, are striking. Through this technique, Greenridge shows how Angelina and Sarah—fleeing the sin of southern slavery and seeking personal atonement—failed to see the full humanity of the Black community they supposedly looked to save.</p> <p>A pivotal early moment in the narrative comes when the sisters took up correspondence with Sarah Mapp Douglass. Two years in, they began to really listen to her, as well as to the Forten women. Greenridge presents Angelina as having this moment where she really was changed, newly aware of the antislavery work done by Black activists and committed to a substantive interracial cooperation. However, the moment quickly passed. Greenridge casts the Grimke-Weld retreat to New Jersey after their marriage as not just a retreat from active abolitionism but as an abandonment of the Black community and interracial efforts. And when the Grimke sisters encountered two of their brother Henry’s children, nephews Archibald Henry Grimke (Archie) and Francis James Grimke (Frank), in the spring of 1869, whatever lessons they learned from Black women in 1838 were gone. They instead scolded the brothers—two young men who had had harrowing experiences in slavery as children and teens—for overspending on ostentatious dress clothing. Frank saw Angelina and Sarah for what they were and drew away, while Archie—a rising member of the Black elite—remained more in their orbit.</p> <p>Greenridge is unsparing in her evaluation of the remaining Grimke family. Angelina and Theodore Weld’s children—Charles Stuart Weld, Theodore <strong>[End Page 610]</strong> Grimke Weld (Sodie), and Sarah Grimke Weld (Sissie)—appear almost shockingly uninterested in following the reformist sensibilities of their parents and were, according to Greenridge, “not particularly remarkable” (p. 174). Sissie’s daughter Angelina Grimke Hamilton (also dubbed Nana) wound up in Anna, Illinois, a notorious sundown town. Archie and Frank, too, wore blinders that blocked them from fully acknowledging either the trauma they had experienced or the classism and elitism of respectability politics. Late in the book, Greenridge depicts an elderly Theodore Weld delighting in “Archie’s Nana,” Angelina Weld Grimke (p. 265). Her great-aunts had died before she was born, but the family legacy...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":45484,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN HISTORY","volume":"77 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Grimkes: The Legacy of Slavery in an American Family by Kerri K. Greenridge (review)\",\"authors\":\"Bonnie Laughlin-Schultz\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/soh.2024.a932567\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>The Grimkes: The Legacy of Slavery in an American Family</em> by Kerri K. Greenridge <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Bonnie Laughlin-Schultz </li> </ul> <em>The Grimkes: The Legacy of Slavery in an American Family</em>. By Kerri K. Greenridge. (New York: Liveright, 2023. Pp. xxviii, 404. Paper, $21.99, ISBN 978-1-324-09454-8; cloth, $32.50, ISBN 978-1-324-09084-7.) <p>In her carefully argued family biography <em>The Grimkes: The Legacy of Slavery in an American Family</em>, Kerri K. Greenridge details the history of the Grimke sisters—Angelina Grimke and Sarah Moore Grimke—and the several generations that followed, those born from Angelina Grimke’s marriage to famed abolitionist Theodore Dwight Weld and those born to an enslaved woman, Nancy Weston, and her abuser (and possible rapist) Henry Grimke. The work opens and closes with details of queer writer Angelina (“Nana”) Weld Grimke, granddaughter of Nancy Weston and Henry Grimke, whose life, like all others in the family, was shaped by race, the legacy of slavery, and her link to the Grimke name.</p> <p>Greenridge’s engrossing narrative centers three themes. First, she traces what she describes as the multigenerational attempt by white reformers (and the Grimke-Welds, specifically) to disavow their “complicity in America’s racial project” (p. xxvi). She highlights the children of Henry and Nancy, too, as in a denial of sorts, highlighting Black elites’ “superficialities” and their classist belief in the politics of respectability in the post–Civil War world (p. xxvii). Third—and possibly most important for those scholars reading this book for intersections with recent abolitionist historiography—she describes “the limits of interracial alliances” (p. xxvii).</p> <p>Greenridge revisits the oft-told story of the power that the Grimke sisters (and Weld) held in late-1830s America as they lectured widely and authored powerful tracts in addition to their work on <em>American Slavery as It Is: Testimony of a Thousand Witnesses</em> (1839). The many narrative choices made by Greenridge to juxtapose the lives of the white Grimkes in Philadelphia and New York with those of their Black neighbors, such as James Forten, are striking. Through this technique, Greenridge shows how Angelina and Sarah—fleeing the sin of southern slavery and seeking personal atonement—failed to see the full humanity of the Black community they supposedly looked to save.</p> <p>A pivotal early moment in the narrative comes when the sisters took up correspondence with Sarah Mapp Douglass. Two years in, they began to really listen to her, as well as to the Forten women. Greenridge presents Angelina as having this moment where she really was changed, newly aware of the antislavery work done by Black activists and committed to a substantive interracial cooperation. However, the moment quickly passed. Greenridge casts the Grimke-Weld retreat to New Jersey after their marriage as not just a retreat from active abolitionism but as an abandonment of the Black community and interracial efforts. And when the Grimke sisters encountered two of their brother Henry’s children, nephews Archibald Henry Grimke (Archie) and Francis James Grimke (Frank), in the spring of 1869, whatever lessons they learned from Black women in 1838 were gone. They instead scolded the brothers—two young men who had had harrowing experiences in slavery as children and teens—for overspending on ostentatious dress clothing. Frank saw Angelina and Sarah for what they were and drew away, while Archie—a rising member of the Black elite—remained more in their orbit.</p> <p>Greenridge is unsparing in her evaluation of the remaining Grimke family. Angelina and Theodore Weld’s children—Charles Stuart Weld, Theodore <strong>[End Page 610]</strong> Grimke Weld (Sodie), and Sarah Grimke Weld (Sissie)—appear almost shockingly uninterested in following the reformist sensibilities of their parents and were, according to Greenridge, “not particularly remarkable” (p. 174). Sissie’s daughter Angelina Grimke Hamilton (also dubbed Nana) wound up in Anna, Illinois, a notorious sundown town. Archie and Frank, too, wore blinders that blocked them from fully acknowledging either the trauma they had experienced or the classism and elitism of respectability politics. Late in the book, Greenridge depicts an elderly Theodore Weld delighting in “Archie’s Nana,” Angelina Weld Grimke (p. 265). Her great-aunts had died before she was born, but the family legacy...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN HISTORY\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN HISTORY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/soh.2024.a932567\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/soh.2024.a932567","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者: 格林柯尔家族:Kerri K. Greenridge 著 Bonnie Laughlin-Schultz 译 The Grimkes:一个美国家庭的奴隶制遗产。作者:凯丽-K-格林里奇。(纽约:Liveright, 2023)。第 xxviii 页,第 404 页。纸质版,21.99 美元,ISBN 978-1-324-09454-8;布质版,32.50 美元,ISBN 978-1-324-09084-7)。在她精心论证的家族传记《格林克斯家族》(The Grimkes:格林里奇(Kerri K. Greenridge)在其经过精心论证的家族传记《格里姆克家族:美国家族中的奴隶制遗产》(The Legacy of Slavery in an American Family)中,详细描述了格里姆克姐妹--安吉丽娜-格里姆克(Angelina Grimke)和萨拉-摩尔-格里姆克(Sarah Moore Grimke)--以及安吉丽娜-格里姆克(Angelina Grimke)与著名废奴主义者西奥多-德怀特-韦尔德(Theodore Dwight Weld)结婚后所生的子女,以及被奴役妇女南希-韦斯顿(Nancy Weston)与虐待她(可能是强奸犯)的亨利-格里姆克(Henry Grimke)所生子女的历史。作品以南希-韦斯顿和亨利-格里姆克的孙女、同性恋作家安吉丽娜-韦尔德-格里姆克("娜娜")的细节开篇和结尾,她的生活和家族中的其他人一样,受到种族、奴隶制遗产以及她与格里姆克姓氏的联系的影响。格林里奇引人入胜的叙述围绕三个主题展开。首先,她追溯了她所描述的白人改革者(特别是格里姆克-韦尔德家族)多代人试图否认他们 "在美国种族项目中的共谋"(第 xxvi 页)。她强调,亨利和南希的子女也在某种程度上否认了黑人精英的 "肤浅 "以及他们对内战后世界体面政治的阶级主义信念(第 xxvii 页)。第三--可能对阅读本书的学者来说最重要的是,本书与近期废奴主义史学的交集--她描述了 "种族间联盟的局限性"(第 xxvii 页)。格林里奇重温了格里姆克姐妹(和韦尔德)在 19 世纪 30 年代晚期的美国所拥有的权力,因为她们除了撰写《美国奴隶制的现状:千人见证》(1839 年)一书之外,还广泛开展演讲并撰写了极具影响力的小册子。格林里奇在叙事上多次选择将费城和纽约的白人格林克斯的生活与他们的黑人邻居(如詹姆斯-福尔滕)的生活并列起来,令人印象深刻。通过这种手法,格林里奇展示了安吉丽娜和萨拉是如何逃离南方奴隶制的罪恶,寻求个人赎罪,却未能看到他们本应拯救的黑人社区的全部人性。姐妹俩与莎拉-梅普-道格拉斯开始通信,这是叙事早期的一个关键时刻。两年后,她们开始真正倾听莎拉-梅普-道格拉斯以及福尔滕妇女们的心声。格林里奇将安吉丽娜描绘成一个真正改变了自己的时刻,她对黑人活动家所做的反奴隶制工作有了新的认识,并致力于开展实质性的跨种族合作。然而,这一刻很快就过去了。格林里奇认为,格里姆克-韦尔德婚后退居新泽西,不仅是对积极废奴主义的退却,也是对黑人社区和跨种族努力的放弃。1869 年春天,格里姆克姐妹遇到了哥哥亨利的两个孩子--侄子阿奇博尔德-亨利-格里姆克(Archibald Henry Grimke,简称 Archie)和弗朗西斯-詹姆斯-格里姆克(Francis James Grimke,简称 Frank),她们在 1838 年从黑人妇女身上学到的教训荡然无存。他们反而斥责兄弟俩--这两个在童年和少年时期经历过奴隶生活的年轻人--在华而不实的服饰上过度消费。弗兰克看清了安吉丽娜和萨拉的真面目,于是远离了他们,而阿奇--黑人精英中的佼佼者--则更多地留在了他们的轨道上。格林里奇对剩下的格里姆克家族的评价毫不留情。安吉丽娜和西奥多-韦尔德的子女--查尔斯-斯图尔特-韦尔德、西奥多 [第 610 页完]-格里姆克-韦尔德(索迪)和萨拉-格里姆克-韦尔德(茜茜)--似乎对追随其父母的改良主义情感毫无兴趣,令人震惊,格林里奇认为他们 "并不特别出众"(第 174 页)。茜茜的女儿安吉丽娜-格里姆克-汉密尔顿(也被称为娜娜)在伊利诺伊州的安娜市长大,这是一个声名狼藉的日落小镇。阿奇和弗兰克也是一叶障目,他们无法完全承认自己所经历的创伤,也无法完全承认阶级歧视和精英政治。在书的末尾,格林里奇描写了年迈的西奥多-韦尔德对 "阿奇的奶奶 "安吉丽娜-韦尔德-格里姆克(Angelina Weld Grimke)的喜爱(第265页)。安吉丽娜-韦尔德-格里姆克(Angelina Weld Grimke)(第 265 页)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Grimkes: The Legacy of Slavery in an American Family by Kerri K. Greenridge (review)
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • The Grimkes: The Legacy of Slavery in an American Family by Kerri K. Greenridge
  • Bonnie Laughlin-Schultz
The Grimkes: The Legacy of Slavery in an American Family. By Kerri K. Greenridge. (New York: Liveright, 2023. Pp. xxviii, 404. Paper, $21.99, ISBN 978-1-324-09454-8; cloth, $32.50, ISBN 978-1-324-09084-7.)

In her carefully argued family biography The Grimkes: The Legacy of Slavery in an American Family, Kerri K. Greenridge details the history of the Grimke sisters—Angelina Grimke and Sarah Moore Grimke—and the several generations that followed, those born from Angelina Grimke’s marriage to famed abolitionist Theodore Dwight Weld and those born to an enslaved woman, Nancy Weston, and her abuser (and possible rapist) Henry Grimke. The work opens and closes with details of queer writer Angelina (“Nana”) Weld Grimke, granddaughter of Nancy Weston and Henry Grimke, whose life, like all others in the family, was shaped by race, the legacy of slavery, and her link to the Grimke name.

Greenridge’s engrossing narrative centers three themes. First, she traces what she describes as the multigenerational attempt by white reformers (and the Grimke-Welds, specifically) to disavow their “complicity in America’s racial project” (p. xxvi). She highlights the children of Henry and Nancy, too, as in a denial of sorts, highlighting Black elites’ “superficialities” and their classist belief in the politics of respectability in the post–Civil War world (p. xxvii). Third—and possibly most important for those scholars reading this book for intersections with recent abolitionist historiography—she describes “the limits of interracial alliances” (p. xxvii).

Greenridge revisits the oft-told story of the power that the Grimke sisters (and Weld) held in late-1830s America as they lectured widely and authored powerful tracts in addition to their work on American Slavery as It Is: Testimony of a Thousand Witnesses (1839). The many narrative choices made by Greenridge to juxtapose the lives of the white Grimkes in Philadelphia and New York with those of their Black neighbors, such as James Forten, are striking. Through this technique, Greenridge shows how Angelina and Sarah—fleeing the sin of southern slavery and seeking personal atonement—failed to see the full humanity of the Black community they supposedly looked to save.

A pivotal early moment in the narrative comes when the sisters took up correspondence with Sarah Mapp Douglass. Two years in, they began to really listen to her, as well as to the Forten women. Greenridge presents Angelina as having this moment where she really was changed, newly aware of the antislavery work done by Black activists and committed to a substantive interracial cooperation. However, the moment quickly passed. Greenridge casts the Grimke-Weld retreat to New Jersey after their marriage as not just a retreat from active abolitionism but as an abandonment of the Black community and interracial efforts. And when the Grimke sisters encountered two of their brother Henry’s children, nephews Archibald Henry Grimke (Archie) and Francis James Grimke (Frank), in the spring of 1869, whatever lessons they learned from Black women in 1838 were gone. They instead scolded the brothers—two young men who had had harrowing experiences in slavery as children and teens—for overspending on ostentatious dress clothing. Frank saw Angelina and Sarah for what they were and drew away, while Archie—a rising member of the Black elite—remained more in their orbit.

Greenridge is unsparing in her evaluation of the remaining Grimke family. Angelina and Theodore Weld’s children—Charles Stuart Weld, Theodore [End Page 610] Grimke Weld (Sodie), and Sarah Grimke Weld (Sissie)—appear almost shockingly uninterested in following the reformist sensibilities of their parents and were, according to Greenridge, “not particularly remarkable” (p. 174). Sissie’s daughter Angelina Grimke Hamilton (also dubbed Nana) wound up in Anna, Illinois, a notorious sundown town. Archie and Frank, too, wore blinders that blocked them from fully acknowledging either the trauma they had experienced or the classism and elitism of respectability politics. Late in the book, Greenridge depicts an elderly Theodore Weld delighting in “Archie’s Nana,” Angelina Weld Grimke (p. 265). Her great-aunts had died before she was born, but the family legacy...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
220
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信