心碎与震惊:内战时期西弗吉尼亚州的离婚》,Allison Dorothy Fredette 编辑(评论)

Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1353/soh.2024.a932575
Katharine Lane Antolini
{"title":"心碎与震惊:内战时期西弗吉尼亚州的离婚》,Allison Dorothy Fredette 编辑(评论)","authors":"Katharine Lane Antolini","doi":"10.1353/soh.2024.a932575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Heartsick and Astonished: Divorce in Civil War–Era West Virginia</em> ed. by Allison Dorothy Fredette <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Katharine Lane Antolini </li> </ul> <em>Heartsick and Astonished: Divorce in Civil War–Era West Virginia</em>. Edited by Allison Dorothy Fredette. New Perspectives on the Civil War Era. (Athens: University of Georgia Press, 2023. Pp. xiv, 288. Paper, $32.95, ISBN 978-0-8203-6428-8; cloth, $114.95, ISBN 978-0-8203-6427-8.) <p>In <em>Heartsick and Astonished: Divorce in Civil War–Era West Virginia</em>, Allison Dorothy Fredette offers twenty-seven divorce cases between 1850 and <strong>[End Page 619]</strong> 1873 from Ohio County, (West) Virginia. This region is significant, according to Fredette, due to the extent of economic, political, and social transition it experienced in the mid-nineteenth century. It was a region gripped by the Civil War and a statehood movement with the county seat, the city of Wheeling, providing the leadership for the formation of West Virginia in 1863. Rapid transformations forced the construction of a new regional identity in which changes in divorce law were one small reflection. Wheeling, as Fredette explains, “was a city of free Blacks, enslaved people, and immigrants, of industry and agriculture, southern by geography and northern by nature” (p. 11). These dynamics were embodied within the bills of divorce, testimonies, and evidentiary letters submitted on behalf of the men and women wishing to end a marriage.</p> <p>Fredette begins with a thorough introduction that provides the reader with the necessary historical context to begin the exploration of divorce cases included in the book. The selected records offer a snapshot of a community’s social change across a twenty-year period, according to Fredette, and she includes a discussion of the local and national socioeconomic changes captured for that period. I was especially drawn to her discussion of expanding and conflicting gender roles as exposed within the divorce suits. The changing divorce laws reflected the evolving debates about women’s legal and economic rights and the new cultural expectations of an emotionally fulfilling marriage and family life. Women were both the oratrix (plaintiff) and the defendant in these cases. As plaintiffs, women sought divorce on grounds of adultery, abandonment, and cruelty, unwilling to suffer any longer in silence. As defendants, women found the soiling of their reputation to be an acceptable sacrifice for freedom from a restrictive marriage and unhappy life. Many chose to ignore the summons to appear in court in their own defense.</p> <p>Placing the divorce cases within the context of the Civil War and its aftermath reveals another level of women’s wartime experiences. Fredette documents a 284 percent increase in the Ohio County divorce rate after the war. Naturally, war is a physically, economically, and emotionally destructive force. Yet the rise in divorce rates illustrates a new measure of both the victimization and the perseverance of a cross-section of women. For some women, seeking divorce was the last desperate step in seeking stability. For others, it was a longed-for beginning of a new life. “[T]he divorce rate rose alongside the war’s end and emancipation,” explains Fredette. “It was no coincidence. The end of one hierarchical relationship called into question others” (p. 31).</p> <p>After the introduction, Fredette divides the divorce suits by year and legal justification: adultery, abandonment, cruelty, and imprisonment. She also provides annotations for the identification of locations, participants, events, and legal terminology. Such organization may limit the book’s usefulness beyond the interests of regional scholars. Had Fredette’s insightful analysis accompanied every chapter, connecting the specific suits showcased within to the multiple interpretations only discussed in the separate introduction, it could serve as a powerful source for students in women’s history and legal studies courses. Nonetheless, Fredette illustrates the power of divorce records to expose the intimate lives of nineteenth-century couples and the human trauma embodied within them. <strong>[End Page 620]</strong></p> Katharine Lane Antolini West Virginia Wesleyan College Copyright © 2024 The Southern Historical Association ... </p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heartsick and Astonished: Divorce in Civil War–Era West Virginia ed. by Allison Dorothy Fredette (review)\",\"authors\":\"Katharine Lane Antolini\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/soh.2024.a932575\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Heartsick and Astonished: Divorce in Civil War–Era West Virginia</em> ed. by Allison Dorothy Fredette <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Katharine Lane Antolini </li> </ul> <em>Heartsick and Astonished: Divorce in Civil War–Era West Virginia</em>. Edited by Allison Dorothy Fredette. New Perspectives on the Civil War Era. (Athens: University of Georgia Press, 2023. Pp. xiv, 288. Paper, $32.95, ISBN 978-0-8203-6428-8; cloth, $114.95, ISBN 978-0-8203-6427-8.) <p>In <em>Heartsick and Astonished: Divorce in Civil War–Era West Virginia</em>, Allison Dorothy Fredette offers twenty-seven divorce cases between 1850 and <strong>[End Page 619]</strong> 1873 from Ohio County, (West) Virginia. This region is significant, according to Fredette, due to the extent of economic, political, and social transition it experienced in the mid-nineteenth century. It was a region gripped by the Civil War and a statehood movement with the county seat, the city of Wheeling, providing the leadership for the formation of West Virginia in 1863. Rapid transformations forced the construction of a new regional identity in which changes in divorce law were one small reflection. Wheeling, as Fredette explains, “was a city of free Blacks, enslaved people, and immigrants, of industry and agriculture, southern by geography and northern by nature” (p. 11). These dynamics were embodied within the bills of divorce, testimonies, and evidentiary letters submitted on behalf of the men and women wishing to end a marriage.</p> <p>Fredette begins with a thorough introduction that provides the reader with the necessary historical context to begin the exploration of divorce cases included in the book. The selected records offer a snapshot of a community’s social change across a twenty-year period, according to Fredette, and she includes a discussion of the local and national socioeconomic changes captured for that period. I was especially drawn to her discussion of expanding and conflicting gender roles as exposed within the divorce suits. The changing divorce laws reflected the evolving debates about women’s legal and economic rights and the new cultural expectations of an emotionally fulfilling marriage and family life. Women were both the oratrix (plaintiff) and the defendant in these cases. As plaintiffs, women sought divorce on grounds of adultery, abandonment, and cruelty, unwilling to suffer any longer in silence. As defendants, women found the soiling of their reputation to be an acceptable sacrifice for freedom from a restrictive marriage and unhappy life. Many chose to ignore the summons to appear in court in their own defense.</p> <p>Placing the divorce cases within the context of the Civil War and its aftermath reveals another level of women’s wartime experiences. Fredette documents a 284 percent increase in the Ohio County divorce rate after the war. Naturally, war is a physically, economically, and emotionally destructive force. Yet the rise in divorce rates illustrates a new measure of both the victimization and the perseverance of a cross-section of women. For some women, seeking divorce was the last desperate step in seeking stability. For others, it was a longed-for beginning of a new life. “[T]he divorce rate rose alongside the war’s end and emancipation,” explains Fredette. “It was no coincidence. The end of one hierarchical relationship called into question others” (p. 31).</p> <p>After the introduction, Fredette divides the divorce suits by year and legal justification: adultery, abandonment, cruelty, and imprisonment. She also provides annotations for the identification of locations, participants, events, and legal terminology. Such organization may limit the book’s usefulness beyond the interests of regional scholars. Had Fredette’s insightful analysis accompanied every chapter, connecting the specific suits showcased within to the multiple interpretations only discussed in the separate introduction, it could serve as a powerful source for students in women’s history and legal studies courses. Nonetheless, Fredette illustrates the power of divorce records to expose the intimate lives of nineteenth-century couples and the human trauma embodied within them. <strong>[End Page 620]</strong></p> Katharine Lane Antolini West Virginia Wesleyan College Copyright © 2024 The Southern Historical Association ... </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/soh.2024.a932575\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/soh.2024.a932575","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者: Heartsick and Astonished:由 Allison Dorothy Fredette Katharine Lane Antolini 编著的《内战时期西弗吉尼亚州的离婚》(Heartsick and Astonished:内战时期西弗吉尼亚州的离婚。编辑:Allison Dorothy Fredette。内战时代的新视角》。(雅典:乔治亚大学出版社,2023 年。第 xiv 页,288 页。纸质版,32.95 美元,ISBN 978-0-8203-6428-8;布质版,114.95 美元,ISBN 978-0-8203-6427-8)。In Heartsick and Astonished:Allison Dorothy Fredette 在《Heartsick and Astonished: Divorce in Civil War-Era West Virginia》一书中介绍了 1850 年至 [尾页 619] 1873 年弗吉尼亚州(西)俄亥俄县的 27 起离婚案。弗雷德特认为,这个地区之所以重要,是因为它在 19 世纪中期经历了巨大的经济、政治和社会转型。1863 年,西弗吉尼亚州在县城惠灵市的领导下成立。快速的变革迫使人们构建新的地区身份,离婚法的变化就是其中的一个缩影。正如弗雷德特所解释的那样,惠灵 "是一个由自由黑人、被奴役者和移民组成的城市,既有工业也有农业,地理位置在南方,而自然环境在北方"(第 11 页)。这些动态体现在代表希望结束婚姻的男女提交的离婚协议书、证词和证据信中。弗雷德特首先进行了详尽的介绍,为读者提供了必要的历史背景,以便开始探讨书中收录的离婚案件。根据弗雷德特的说法,所选记录提供了一个社区二十年间社会变迁的缩影,她还讨论了这一时期当地和全国的社会经济变化。我尤其被她关于离婚诉讼中暴露出的不断扩大和冲突的性别角色的讨论所吸引。不断变化的离婚法反映了关于妇女法律和经济权利的争论,以及对情感美满的婚姻和家庭生活的新文化期望。在这些案件中,妇女既是原告,也是被告。作为原告,妇女以通奸、遗弃和虐待为由要求离婚,不愿再默默忍受。作为被告,妇女们认为,为了摆脱受限制的婚姻和不幸福的生活,牺牲自己的名誉是可以接受的。许多人选择无视出庭为自己辩护的传票。将离婚案件置于南北战争及其后果的背景下,可以从另一个层面揭示妇女的战时经历。根据弗雷德特的记录,战后俄亥俄州的离婚率上升了 284%。自然,战争在身体、经济和情感上都是一种毁灭性的力量。然而,离婚率的上升说明了一种新的衡量标准,既可以衡量妇女的受害程度,也可以衡量她们的毅力。对一些妇女来说,离婚是寻求稳定的最后一步。而对另一些妇女来说,离婚则是她们渴望已久的新生活的开始。"离婚率随着战争的结束和解放而上升,"弗雷德特解释道。"这绝非巧合。一种等级关系的结束使其他等级关系受到质疑"(第 31 页)。在导言之后,Fredette 将离婚诉讼按年份和法律依据进行了划分:通奸、遗弃、虐待和监禁。她还为地点、参与者、事件和法律术语的识别提供了注释。这种编排方式可能会限制该书的实用性,使其超出地区学者的兴趣范围。如果弗雷德特在每一章都附有精辟的分析,将书中展示的具体诉讼与仅在单独的导言中讨论的多种解释联系起来,那么这本书就可以成为妇女历史和法律研究课程学生的有力资料。尽管如此,弗雷德特还是展示了离婚记录的力量,揭示了 19 世纪夫妻的亲密生活以及其中蕴含的人性创伤。[End Page 620] Katharine Lane Antolini 西弗吉尼亚卫斯理学院 版权所有 © 2024 年南方历史协会 ...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
Heartsick and Astonished: Divorce in Civil War–Era West Virginia ed. by Allison Dorothy Fredette (review)
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • Heartsick and Astonished: Divorce in Civil War–Era West Virginia ed. by Allison Dorothy Fredette
  • Katharine Lane Antolini
Heartsick and Astonished: Divorce in Civil War–Era West Virginia. Edited by Allison Dorothy Fredette. New Perspectives on the Civil War Era. (Athens: University of Georgia Press, 2023. Pp. xiv, 288. Paper, $32.95, ISBN 978-0-8203-6428-8; cloth, $114.95, ISBN 978-0-8203-6427-8.)

In Heartsick and Astonished: Divorce in Civil War–Era West Virginia, Allison Dorothy Fredette offers twenty-seven divorce cases between 1850 and [End Page 619] 1873 from Ohio County, (West) Virginia. This region is significant, according to Fredette, due to the extent of economic, political, and social transition it experienced in the mid-nineteenth century. It was a region gripped by the Civil War and a statehood movement with the county seat, the city of Wheeling, providing the leadership for the formation of West Virginia in 1863. Rapid transformations forced the construction of a new regional identity in which changes in divorce law were one small reflection. Wheeling, as Fredette explains, “was a city of free Blacks, enslaved people, and immigrants, of industry and agriculture, southern by geography and northern by nature” (p. 11). These dynamics were embodied within the bills of divorce, testimonies, and evidentiary letters submitted on behalf of the men and women wishing to end a marriage.

Fredette begins with a thorough introduction that provides the reader with the necessary historical context to begin the exploration of divorce cases included in the book. The selected records offer a snapshot of a community’s social change across a twenty-year period, according to Fredette, and she includes a discussion of the local and national socioeconomic changes captured for that period. I was especially drawn to her discussion of expanding and conflicting gender roles as exposed within the divorce suits. The changing divorce laws reflected the evolving debates about women’s legal and economic rights and the new cultural expectations of an emotionally fulfilling marriage and family life. Women were both the oratrix (plaintiff) and the defendant in these cases. As plaintiffs, women sought divorce on grounds of adultery, abandonment, and cruelty, unwilling to suffer any longer in silence. As defendants, women found the soiling of their reputation to be an acceptable sacrifice for freedom from a restrictive marriage and unhappy life. Many chose to ignore the summons to appear in court in their own defense.

Placing the divorce cases within the context of the Civil War and its aftermath reveals another level of women’s wartime experiences. Fredette documents a 284 percent increase in the Ohio County divorce rate after the war. Naturally, war is a physically, economically, and emotionally destructive force. Yet the rise in divorce rates illustrates a new measure of both the victimization and the perseverance of a cross-section of women. For some women, seeking divorce was the last desperate step in seeking stability. For others, it was a longed-for beginning of a new life. “[T]he divorce rate rose alongside the war’s end and emancipation,” explains Fredette. “It was no coincidence. The end of one hierarchical relationship called into question others” (p. 31).

After the introduction, Fredette divides the divorce suits by year and legal justification: adultery, abandonment, cruelty, and imprisonment. She also provides annotations for the identification of locations, participants, events, and legal terminology. Such organization may limit the book’s usefulness beyond the interests of regional scholars. Had Fredette’s insightful analysis accompanied every chapter, connecting the specific suits showcased within to the multiple interpretations only discussed in the separate introduction, it could serve as a powerful source for students in women’s history and legal studies courses. Nonetheless, Fredette illustrates the power of divorce records to expose the intimate lives of nineteenth-century couples and the human trauma embodied within them. [End Page 620]

Katharine Lane Antolini West Virginia Wesleyan College Copyright © 2024 The Southern Historical Association ...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信