开发本科物理实验课程的全球景观

Gayle Geschwind, Micol Alemani, Michael F. J. Fox, P. S. W. M. Logman, Eugenio Tufino, H. J. Lewandowski
{"title":"开发本科物理实验课程的全球景观","authors":"Gayle Geschwind, Micol Alemani, Michael F. J. Fox, P. S. W. M. Logman, Eugenio Tufino, H. J. Lewandowski","doi":"arxiv-2407.09712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Physics Education Research (PER) is a global endeavour, with a wealth of work\nperformed at a variety of institutions worldwide. However, results from\nresearch into undergraduate physics laboratory courses is often difficult to\ncompare due to the broad variations in courses. We have created a survey to\nhelp classify these courses to compare and contrast them, which will be useful\nin two key endeavours: comparisons between PER studies and providing useful\ndata for individual instructors hoping to improve their courses, thus providing\ninformation relevant to both researchers and instructors. While we are still in\nthe process of collecting sufficient data to create a full taxonomy of\nlaboratory courses, we present here details of the survey creation itself, as\nwell as a first look at the data collected, which includes a broad landscape of\nlab courses in 41 countries. We used both quantitative and qualitative methods\nin analyzing the data collected. Some of these results include similarities\nbetween courses, such as students often using pre-constructed apparatuses and\nthat instructors hope for students to learn technical skills. We also find\ndifferences in courses, such as in the number and types of goals of the course,\nas well as the activities students participate in.","PeriodicalId":501565,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Physics Education","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a global landscape of undergraduate physics laboratory courses\",\"authors\":\"Gayle Geschwind, Micol Alemani, Michael F. J. Fox, P. S. W. M. Logman, Eugenio Tufino, H. J. Lewandowski\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2407.09712\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Physics Education Research (PER) is a global endeavour, with a wealth of work\\nperformed at a variety of institutions worldwide. However, results from\\nresearch into undergraduate physics laboratory courses is often difficult to\\ncompare due to the broad variations in courses. We have created a survey to\\nhelp classify these courses to compare and contrast them, which will be useful\\nin two key endeavours: comparisons between PER studies and providing useful\\ndata for individual instructors hoping to improve their courses, thus providing\\ninformation relevant to both researchers and instructors. While we are still in\\nthe process of collecting sufficient data to create a full taxonomy of\\nlaboratory courses, we present here details of the survey creation itself, as\\nwell as a first look at the data collected, which includes a broad landscape of\\nlab courses in 41 countries. We used both quantitative and qualitative methods\\nin analyzing the data collected. Some of these results include similarities\\nbetween courses, such as students often using pre-constructed apparatuses and\\nthat instructors hope for students to learn technical skills. We also find\\ndifferences in courses, such as in the number and types of goals of the course,\\nas well as the activities students participate in.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Physics Education\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Physics Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.09712\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Physics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.09712","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

物理教育研究(PER)是一项全球性的工作,世界各地的不同机构都开展了大量的工作。然而,由于课程差异很大,本科物理实验课程的研究成果往往难以比较。我们制作了一份调查表来帮助对这些课程进行分类,以便对它们进行比较和对比,这将有助于两项关键工作:PER 研究之间的比较,以及为希望改进课程的个别教师提供有用的数据,从而为研究人员和教师提供相关信息。虽然我们仍在收集足够的数据以创建完整的实验课程分类法,但我们在此介绍了调查创建本身的细节,以及所收集数据的初步情况,其中包括 41 个国家的实验课程的广泛情况。我们采用了定量和定性两种方法来分析收集到的数据。其中一些结果包括课程之间的相似性,如学生经常使用预制仪器,以及教师希望学生学习技术技能。我们还发现了课程之间的差异,如课程目标的数量和类型,以及学生参与的活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of a global landscape of undergraduate physics laboratory courses
Physics Education Research (PER) is a global endeavour, with a wealth of work performed at a variety of institutions worldwide. However, results from research into undergraduate physics laboratory courses is often difficult to compare due to the broad variations in courses. We have created a survey to help classify these courses to compare and contrast them, which will be useful in two key endeavours: comparisons between PER studies and providing useful data for individual instructors hoping to improve their courses, thus providing information relevant to both researchers and instructors. While we are still in the process of collecting sufficient data to create a full taxonomy of laboratory courses, we present here details of the survey creation itself, as well as a first look at the data collected, which includes a broad landscape of lab courses in 41 countries. We used both quantitative and qualitative methods in analyzing the data collected. Some of these results include similarities between courses, such as students often using pre-constructed apparatuses and that instructors hope for students to learn technical skills. We also find differences in courses, such as in the number and types of goals of the course, as well as the activities students participate in.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信