在机械辅助深吸气时进行肺和肝脏立体定向体放射治疗:前瞻性可行性试验

IF 2.2 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Loïc Vander Veken MD, PhD , Geneviève Van Ooteghem MD, PhD , Benoît Ghaye MD, PhD , Ariane Razavi MSc , David Dechambre MSc , Xavier Geets MD, PhD
{"title":"在机械辅助深吸气时进行肺和肝脏立体定向体放射治疗:前瞻性可行性试验","authors":"Loïc Vander Veken MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Geneviève Van Ooteghem MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Benoît Ghaye MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Ariane Razavi MSc ,&nbsp;David Dechambre MSc ,&nbsp;Xavier Geets MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Radiation therapy for tumors subject to breathing-related motion during breath-holds (BHs) has the potential to substantially reduce the irradiated volume. Mechanically assisted and noninvasive ventilation (MANIV) could ensure the target repositioning accuracy during each BH while facilitating treatment feasibility through oxygen supplementation and a perfectly replicated mechanical support. However, there is currently no clinical evidence substantiating the use of MANIV-induced BH for moving tumors. The aim of this work was, therefore, to evaluate the technique's performance under real treatment conditions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><p>Patients eligible for lung or liver stereotactic body radiation therapy were prospectively included in a single-arm trial. The primary endpoint corresponded to the treatment feasibility with MANIV. Secondary outcomes comprised intrafraction geometric uncertainties extracted from real-time imaging, tolerance to BH, and treatment time.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Treatment was successfully delivered in 92.9% (13/14) of patients: 1 patient with a liver tumor was excluded because of a mechanically induced gastric insufflation displacing the liver cranially by more than 1 cm. In the left-right/anteroposterior/craniocaudal directions, the recalculated safety margins based on intrafraction positional data were 4.6 mm/5.1 mm/5.6 mm and 4.7 mm/7.3 mm/5.9 mm for lung and liver lesions, respectively. Compared with the free-breathing internal target volume and midposition approaches, the average reduction in the planning target volume with MANIV reached −47.2% ± 15.3%, <em>P</em> &lt; .001, and −29.4% ± 19.2%, <em>P</em> = .007, for intrathoracic tumors and −23.3% ± 12.4%, <em>P</em> &lt; .001, and −9.3% ± 15.3%, <em>P</em> = .073, for upper abdominal tumors, respectively. For 1 liver lesion, large caudal drifts of occasionally more than 1 cm were measured. The total slot time was 53.1 ± 10.6 minutes with a BH comfort level of 80.1% ± 10.6%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>MANIV enables high treatment feasibility within a nonselected population. Accurate intrafraction tumor repositioning is achieved for lung tumors. Because of occasional intra-BH caudal drifts, pretreatment assessment of BH stability for liver lesions is, however, recommended.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"9 9","pages":"Article 101563"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S245210942400126X/pdfft?md5=2aacbb1f64348b5f3e181f95b6c8f0d3&pid=1-s2.0-S245210942400126X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lung and Liver Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy During Mechanically Assisted Deep Inspiration Breath-Holds: A Prospective Feasibility Trial\",\"authors\":\"Loïc Vander Veken MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Geneviève Van Ooteghem MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Benoît Ghaye MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Ariane Razavi MSc ,&nbsp;David Dechambre MSc ,&nbsp;Xavier Geets MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101563\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Radiation therapy for tumors subject to breathing-related motion during breath-holds (BHs) has the potential to substantially reduce the irradiated volume. Mechanically assisted and noninvasive ventilation (MANIV) could ensure the target repositioning accuracy during each BH while facilitating treatment feasibility through oxygen supplementation and a perfectly replicated mechanical support. However, there is currently no clinical evidence substantiating the use of MANIV-induced BH for moving tumors. The aim of this work was, therefore, to evaluate the technique's performance under real treatment conditions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><p>Patients eligible for lung or liver stereotactic body radiation therapy were prospectively included in a single-arm trial. The primary endpoint corresponded to the treatment feasibility with MANIV. Secondary outcomes comprised intrafraction geometric uncertainties extracted from real-time imaging, tolerance to BH, and treatment time.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Treatment was successfully delivered in 92.9% (13/14) of patients: 1 patient with a liver tumor was excluded because of a mechanically induced gastric insufflation displacing the liver cranially by more than 1 cm. In the left-right/anteroposterior/craniocaudal directions, the recalculated safety margins based on intrafraction positional data were 4.6 mm/5.1 mm/5.6 mm and 4.7 mm/7.3 mm/5.9 mm for lung and liver lesions, respectively. Compared with the free-breathing internal target volume and midposition approaches, the average reduction in the planning target volume with MANIV reached −47.2% ± 15.3%, <em>P</em> &lt; .001, and −29.4% ± 19.2%, <em>P</em> = .007, for intrathoracic tumors and −23.3% ± 12.4%, <em>P</em> &lt; .001, and −9.3% ± 15.3%, <em>P</em> = .073, for upper abdominal tumors, respectively. For 1 liver lesion, large caudal drifts of occasionally more than 1 cm were measured. The total slot time was 53.1 ± 10.6 minutes with a BH comfort level of 80.1% ± 10.6%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>MANIV enables high treatment feasibility within a nonselected population. Accurate intrafraction tumor repositioning is achieved for lung tumors. Because of occasional intra-BH caudal drifts, pretreatment assessment of BH stability for liver lesions is, however, recommended.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"9 9\",\"pages\":\"Article 101563\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S245210942400126X/pdfft?md5=2aacbb1f64348b5f3e181f95b6c8f0d3&pid=1-s2.0-S245210942400126X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S245210942400126X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S245210942400126X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 对憋气(BHs)期间受呼吸相关运动影响的肿瘤进行放射治疗有可能大幅减少照射体积。机械辅助和无创通气(MANIV)可确保每次屏气时目标重新定位的准确性,同时通过氧气补充和完美复制的机械支持提高治疗的可行性。然而,目前还没有临床证据证明 MANIV 诱导的 BH 可用于移动肿瘤。因此,这项工作的目的是评估该技术在实际治疗条件下的性能。方法和材料符合肺部或肝脏立体定向体放射治疗条件的患者被前瞻性地纳入单臂试验。主要终点是MANIV的治疗可行性。次要结果包括从实时成像中提取的分量内几何不确定性、对BH的耐受性和治疗时间。结果92.9%(13/14)的患者成功接受了治疗:1名肝脏肿瘤患者因机械性胃充气导致肝脏向颅内移位超过1厘米而被排除在外。在左右/前后/颅尾方向,根据分块内位置数据重新计算的肺部和肝脏病变安全裕度分别为4.6毫米/5.1毫米/5.6毫米和4.7毫米/7.3毫米/5.9毫米。与自由呼吸内靶体积法和中间定位法相比,MANIV的规划靶体积平均减少率分别为:胸腔内肿瘤-47.2%±15.3%,P <.001;胸腔外肿瘤-29.4%±19.2%,P = .007;上腹部肿瘤-23.3%±12.4%,P <.001;上腹部肿瘤-9.3%±15.3%,P = .073。对于 1 个肝脏病变,测量到的尾部漂移偶尔超过 1 厘米。插槽总时间为 53.1 ± 10.6 分钟,BH 舒适度为 80.1% ± 10.6%。对于肺部肿瘤,可实现精确的分部内肿瘤复位。由于BH内尾部偶有漂移,因此建议对肝脏病变进行BH稳定性评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lung and Liver Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy During Mechanically Assisted Deep Inspiration Breath-Holds: A Prospective Feasibility Trial

Purpose

Radiation therapy for tumors subject to breathing-related motion during breath-holds (BHs) has the potential to substantially reduce the irradiated volume. Mechanically assisted and noninvasive ventilation (MANIV) could ensure the target repositioning accuracy during each BH while facilitating treatment feasibility through oxygen supplementation and a perfectly replicated mechanical support. However, there is currently no clinical evidence substantiating the use of MANIV-induced BH for moving tumors. The aim of this work was, therefore, to evaluate the technique's performance under real treatment conditions.

Methods and Materials

Patients eligible for lung or liver stereotactic body radiation therapy were prospectively included in a single-arm trial. The primary endpoint corresponded to the treatment feasibility with MANIV. Secondary outcomes comprised intrafraction geometric uncertainties extracted from real-time imaging, tolerance to BH, and treatment time.

Results

Treatment was successfully delivered in 92.9% (13/14) of patients: 1 patient with a liver tumor was excluded because of a mechanically induced gastric insufflation displacing the liver cranially by more than 1 cm. In the left-right/anteroposterior/craniocaudal directions, the recalculated safety margins based on intrafraction positional data were 4.6 mm/5.1 mm/5.6 mm and 4.7 mm/7.3 mm/5.9 mm for lung and liver lesions, respectively. Compared with the free-breathing internal target volume and midposition approaches, the average reduction in the planning target volume with MANIV reached −47.2% ± 15.3%, P < .001, and −29.4% ± 19.2%, P = .007, for intrathoracic tumors and −23.3% ± 12.4%, P < .001, and −9.3% ± 15.3%, P = .073, for upper abdominal tumors, respectively. For 1 liver lesion, large caudal drifts of occasionally more than 1 cm were measured. The total slot time was 53.1 ± 10.6 minutes with a BH comfort level of 80.1% ± 10.6%.

Conclusions

MANIV enables high treatment feasibility within a nonselected population. Accurate intrafraction tumor repositioning is achieved for lung tumors. Because of occasional intra-BH caudal drifts, pretreatment assessment of BH stability for liver lesions is, however, recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Radiation Oncology
Advances in Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
98 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of Advances is to provide information for clinicians who use radiation therapy by publishing: Clinical trial reports and reanalyses. Basic science original reports. Manuscripts examining health services research, comparative and cost effectiveness research, and systematic reviews. Case reports documenting unusual problems and solutions. High quality multi and single institutional series, as well as other novel retrospective hypothesis generating series. Timely critical reviews on important topics in radiation oncology, such as side effects. Articles reporting the natural history of disease and patterns of failure, particularly as they relate to treatment volume delineation. Articles on safety and quality in radiation therapy. Essays on clinical experience. Articles on practice transformation in radiation oncology, in particular: Aspects of health policy that may impact the future practice of radiation oncology. How information technology, such as data analytics and systems innovations, will change radiation oncology practice. Articles on imaging as they relate to radiation therapy treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信