成人和小儿创伤患者的 RhD 免疫

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Richard R. Gammon , Nour Almozain , Daniela Hermelin , Norma Klein , Sadhana Mangwana , Amita Radhakrishnan Nair , Jennifer J. O'Brien , Aaron Daniel Shmookler , Laura Stephens , Christopher Bocquet
{"title":"成人和小儿创伤患者的 RhD 免疫","authors":"Richard R. Gammon ,&nbsp;Nour Almozain ,&nbsp;Daniela Hermelin ,&nbsp;Norma Klein ,&nbsp;Sadhana Mangwana ,&nbsp;Amita Radhakrishnan Nair ,&nbsp;Jennifer J. O'Brien ,&nbsp;Aaron Daniel Shmookler ,&nbsp;Laura Stephens ,&nbsp;Christopher Bocquet","doi":"10.1016/j.tmrv.2024.150842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The actual risk of providing RhD-positive units to RhD-negative recipients remains debatable. There is no standard of care in the United States (US) to guide transfusion decisions regarding RhD type for patients with an unknown blood type, except for women of childbearing age and neonates. The risk of alloantibody formation by an RhD-negative patient exposed to RhD-positive blood is reported to be from 3% to 70%. Due to such wide variations, this review was undertaken to determine the prevalence of anti-D alloimmunization in trauma patients who are RhD-negative and were transfused RhD-positive blood products. This study used the “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses” (PRISMA) approach to answer the question, “In trauma patients who were transfused blood, what is the prevalence of alloimmunization to the D-antigen?” The review included all published articles through April 3, 2022 in databases. Articles published after the search period found by the authors were added to the manuscript if they addressed the primary question and there was unanimous consensus. There were 1683 full-text articles that met the search criteria, with 19 studies meeting eligibility criteria. In addition, 57 references were added after the search period had closed. The incidence of anti-D alloimmunization in adult trauma patients receiving whole blood varied from 7.8% to 42.7%. In contrast, incidence varied in patients receiving red blood cells (RBCs), from 0 to 94%, depending on number of categories analyzed. Anti-D alloimmunization with platelet transfusions varied from 0% to 19%. The alloimmunization rate increased with age and was detected only in children older than 5 years. Recent guidelines recommend the administration of Rh immune globulin (RhIG) to all traumatically injured patients who are both RhD-negative and pregnant. However, there is no specific guidance focused on the RhD-negative patient, pregnant or nonpregnant, and who have received RhD-positive red blood cells (RBC) and platelets. While numerous studies have attempted to evaluate the frequency of RhD alloimmunization rate in trauma settings, emerging data suggests that many factors affect this phenomenon. Additionally, the role of RhIG administration in cases of RhD-incompatible transfusions within the trauma setting adds complexity. As our trajectory propels us towards precision medicine and tailored transfusion practices, gaining a big data approach becomes indispensable.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56081,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine Reviews","volume":"38 4","pages":"Article 150842"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RhD-Alloimmunization in Adult and Pediatric Trauma Patients\",\"authors\":\"Richard R. Gammon ,&nbsp;Nour Almozain ,&nbsp;Daniela Hermelin ,&nbsp;Norma Klein ,&nbsp;Sadhana Mangwana ,&nbsp;Amita Radhakrishnan Nair ,&nbsp;Jennifer J. O'Brien ,&nbsp;Aaron Daniel Shmookler ,&nbsp;Laura Stephens ,&nbsp;Christopher Bocquet\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tmrv.2024.150842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The actual risk of providing RhD-positive units to RhD-negative recipients remains debatable. There is no standard of care in the United States (US) to guide transfusion decisions regarding RhD type for patients with an unknown blood type, except for women of childbearing age and neonates. The risk of alloantibody formation by an RhD-negative patient exposed to RhD-positive blood is reported to be from 3% to 70%. Due to such wide variations, this review was undertaken to determine the prevalence of anti-D alloimmunization in trauma patients who are RhD-negative and were transfused RhD-positive blood products. This study used the “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses” (PRISMA) approach to answer the question, “In trauma patients who were transfused blood, what is the prevalence of alloimmunization to the D-antigen?” The review included all published articles through April 3, 2022 in databases. Articles published after the search period found by the authors were added to the manuscript if they addressed the primary question and there was unanimous consensus. There were 1683 full-text articles that met the search criteria, with 19 studies meeting eligibility criteria. In addition, 57 references were added after the search period had closed. The incidence of anti-D alloimmunization in adult trauma patients receiving whole blood varied from 7.8% to 42.7%. In contrast, incidence varied in patients receiving red blood cells (RBCs), from 0 to 94%, depending on number of categories analyzed. Anti-D alloimmunization with platelet transfusions varied from 0% to 19%. The alloimmunization rate increased with age and was detected only in children older than 5 years. Recent guidelines recommend the administration of Rh immune globulin (RhIG) to all traumatically injured patients who are both RhD-negative and pregnant. However, there is no specific guidance focused on the RhD-negative patient, pregnant or nonpregnant, and who have received RhD-positive red blood cells (RBC) and platelets. While numerous studies have attempted to evaluate the frequency of RhD alloimmunization rate in trauma settings, emerging data suggests that many factors affect this phenomenon. Additionally, the role of RhIG administration in cases of RhD-incompatible transfusions within the trauma setting adds complexity. As our trajectory propels us towards precision medicine and tailored transfusion practices, gaining a big data approach becomes indispensable.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transfusion Medicine Reviews\",\"volume\":\"38 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 150842\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transfusion Medicine Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887796324000324\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion Medicine Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887796324000324","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为 RhD 阴性受血者提供 RhD 阳性单位的实际风险仍有争议。在美国,除育龄妇女和新生儿外,对于血型不明的 RhD 患者,目前尚无指导输血决策的标准。据报道,RhD 阴性患者接触 RhD 阳性血液后形成同种抗体的风险从 3% 到 70%不等。由于存在如此大的差异,本研究旨在确定输注 RhD 阳性血液制品的 RhD 阴性外伤患者中抗 D 型同种异体免疫的发生率。本研究采用 "系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目"(PRISMA)的方法来回答以下问题:"在输血的创伤患者中,D抗原同种免疫的发生率是多少?综述包括数据库中截至 2022 年 4 月 3 日发表的所有文章。如果作者发现在检索期之后发表的文章涉及主要问题,并达成一致共识,则将其添加到稿件中。共有 1683 篇全文文章符合检索标准,其中 19 项研究符合资格标准。此外,还有 57 篇参考文献是在检索期结束后添加的。在接受全血的成人创伤患者中,抗 D 免疫发生率从 7.8% 到 42.7% 不等。相比之下,接受红细胞(RBC)治疗的患者的发病率则各不相同,从 0% 到 94%不等,具体取决于分析的类别数量。输注血小板引起的抗 D 免疫从 0% 到 19% 不等。抗 D 免疫率随年龄增长而增加,仅在 5 岁以上儿童中发现。最近的指南建议对所有 RhD 阴性且怀孕的外伤患者注射 Rh 免疫球蛋白(RhIG)。但是,对于 RhD 阴性、怀孕或未怀孕、接受过 RhD 阳性红细胞(RBC)和血小板的患者,目前还没有专门的指导。尽管许多研究都试图评估创伤环境中 RhD 同种免疫率的频率,但新出现的数据表明,影响这一现象的因素很多。此外,RhIG 在创伤环境中 RhD 不相容输血病例中的作用也增加了复杂性。随着我们迈向精准医疗和量身定制的输血实践,获得大数据方法变得不可或缺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
RhD-Alloimmunization in Adult and Pediatric Trauma Patients

The actual risk of providing RhD-positive units to RhD-negative recipients remains debatable. There is no standard of care in the United States (US) to guide transfusion decisions regarding RhD type for patients with an unknown blood type, except for women of childbearing age and neonates. The risk of alloantibody formation by an RhD-negative patient exposed to RhD-positive blood is reported to be from 3% to 70%. Due to such wide variations, this review was undertaken to determine the prevalence of anti-D alloimmunization in trauma patients who are RhD-negative and were transfused RhD-positive blood products. This study used the “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses” (PRISMA) approach to answer the question, “In trauma patients who were transfused blood, what is the prevalence of alloimmunization to the D-antigen?” The review included all published articles through April 3, 2022 in databases. Articles published after the search period found by the authors were added to the manuscript if they addressed the primary question and there was unanimous consensus. There were 1683 full-text articles that met the search criteria, with 19 studies meeting eligibility criteria. In addition, 57 references were added after the search period had closed. The incidence of anti-D alloimmunization in adult trauma patients receiving whole blood varied from 7.8% to 42.7%. In contrast, incidence varied in patients receiving red blood cells (RBCs), from 0 to 94%, depending on number of categories analyzed. Anti-D alloimmunization with platelet transfusions varied from 0% to 19%. The alloimmunization rate increased with age and was detected only in children older than 5 years. Recent guidelines recommend the administration of Rh immune globulin (RhIG) to all traumatically injured patients who are both RhD-negative and pregnant. However, there is no specific guidance focused on the RhD-negative patient, pregnant or nonpregnant, and who have received RhD-positive red blood cells (RBC) and platelets. While numerous studies have attempted to evaluate the frequency of RhD alloimmunization rate in trauma settings, emerging data suggests that many factors affect this phenomenon. Additionally, the role of RhIG administration in cases of RhD-incompatible transfusions within the trauma setting adds complexity. As our trajectory propels us towards precision medicine and tailored transfusion practices, gaining a big data approach becomes indispensable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transfusion Medicine Reviews
Transfusion Medicine Reviews 医学-血液学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Transfusion Medicine Reviews provides an international forum in English for the publication of scholarly work devoted to the various sub-disciplines that comprise Transfusion Medicine including hemostasis and thrombosis and cellular therapies. The scope of the journal encompasses basic science, practical aspects, laboratory developments, clinical indications, and adverse effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信