培训学生在客观结构化临床检查中充当标准化病人是可行的:混合方法研究

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
{"title":"培训学生在客观结构化临床检查中充当标准化病人是可行的:混合方法研究","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>This study aimed to evaluate examinees’ perceptions of the performance of student standardized patients (SPs) and to explore student SPs’ experiences.</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) is a standard approach to the task of evaluating students’ clinical competency that relies on SPs. However, professional SPs are characterized by high costs and insufficient availability. Training students to serve as SPs can help address this lack of OSCE resources. However, only preliminary evidence regarding this process and its feasibility has been reported.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>We used a concurrent mixed-method study design that included quantitative surveys and qualitative group interviews.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Our sample consisted of two-year Bachelor of Nursing program students and trained student SPs who were recruited in May 2021. We used a 5-item performance evaluation tool to assess the SPs’ performance. The reliability of this evaluation tool was indicated by a Cronbach’s α coefficient of.95. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the examinees’ satisfaction with the student SPs’ performance using SPSS 28.0 software. We used a semi-structured interview guide during a group interview; the interview was transcribed verbatim and analyzed via thematic analysis with the assistance of Microsoft Word software.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eighty-two nursing school students responded to the survey and 10 student SPs were included in a group interview. Nursing school students rated SPs’ performance favorably. The mean score assigned to the SPs on the performance scale was 4.41 out of 5. The student SPs described the challenges and benefits that they experienced regarding their role. The challenges they described included 1) staying true to my role, 2) overcoming a physically overwhelming role and 3) facing the threat of insecurity. However, the corresponding benefits included 1) gaining rewards, 2) advancing nursing competency and 3) experiencing a sense of accomplishment.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>After undergoing training, the SPs performed well. They experienced a variety of challenges and obtained certain benefits. In health care education, recruiting students to serve as SPs is feasible.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48715,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education in Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Training students to serve as standardized patients in an objective structured clinical examination is feasible: A mixed-methods study\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>This study aimed to evaluate examinees’ perceptions of the performance of student standardized patients (SPs) and to explore student SPs’ experiences.</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) is a standard approach to the task of evaluating students’ clinical competency that relies on SPs. However, professional SPs are characterized by high costs and insufficient availability. Training students to serve as SPs can help address this lack of OSCE resources. However, only preliminary evidence regarding this process and its feasibility has been reported.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>We used a concurrent mixed-method study design that included quantitative surveys and qualitative group interviews.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Our sample consisted of two-year Bachelor of Nursing program students and trained student SPs who were recruited in May 2021. We used a 5-item performance evaluation tool to assess the SPs’ performance. The reliability of this evaluation tool was indicated by a Cronbach’s α coefficient of.95. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the examinees’ satisfaction with the student SPs’ performance using SPSS 28.0 software. We used a semi-structured interview guide during a group interview; the interview was transcribed verbatim and analyzed via thematic analysis with the assistance of Microsoft Word software.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eighty-two nursing school students responded to the survey and 10 student SPs were included in a group interview. Nursing school students rated SPs’ performance favorably. The mean score assigned to the SPs on the performance scale was 4.41 out of 5. The student SPs described the challenges and benefits that they experienced regarding their role. The challenges they described included 1) staying true to my role, 2) overcoming a physically overwhelming role and 3) facing the threat of insecurity. However, the corresponding benefits included 1) gaining rewards, 2) advancing nursing competency and 3) experiencing a sense of accomplishment.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>After undergoing training, the SPs performed well. They experienced a variety of challenges and obtained certain benefits. In health care education, recruiting students to serve as SPs is feasible.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nurse Education in Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nurse Education in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595324001987\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595324001987","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)是评价学生临床能力的一种标准方法,它依赖于标准化病人。然而,专业的临床医师费用高昂且缺乏。培训学生担任专业医师有助于解决 OSCE 资源不足的问题。方法我们的样本包括 2021 年 5 月招募的两年制护理学士课程学生和经过培训的学生 SP。我们使用 5 个项目的绩效评估工具来评估 SP 的绩效。Cronbach's α系数为.95,表明该评估工具的可靠性。我们使用 SPSS 28.0 软件进行了描述性统计,以评估受试者对学生助教表现的满意度。在小组访谈中,我们使用了半结构化访谈指南;访谈内容逐字记录,并在 Microsoft Word 软件的帮助下进行主题分析。护校学生对 SP 的表现给予了好评。学生对护理专业人员工作表现的平均评分为 4.41 分(满分 5 分)。学生护士描述了他们在履行职责时遇到的挑战和获得的益处。他们所描述的挑战包括:1)忠于自己的角色;2)克服角色带来的身体负担;3)面对不安全的威胁。然而,相应的益处包括:1)获得回报;2)提高护理能力;3)体验成就感。他们经历了各种挑战,并获得了一定的收益。在健康护理教育中,招募学生担任 SP 是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Training students to serve as standardized patients in an objective structured clinical examination is feasible: A mixed-methods study

Aim

This study aimed to evaluate examinees’ perceptions of the performance of student standardized patients (SPs) and to explore student SPs’ experiences.

Background

Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) is a standard approach to the task of evaluating students’ clinical competency that relies on SPs. However, professional SPs are characterized by high costs and insufficient availability. Training students to serve as SPs can help address this lack of OSCE resources. However, only preliminary evidence regarding this process and its feasibility has been reported.

Design

We used a concurrent mixed-method study design that included quantitative surveys and qualitative group interviews.

Methods

Our sample consisted of two-year Bachelor of Nursing program students and trained student SPs who were recruited in May 2021. We used a 5-item performance evaluation tool to assess the SPs’ performance. The reliability of this evaluation tool was indicated by a Cronbach’s α coefficient of.95. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the examinees’ satisfaction with the student SPs’ performance using SPSS 28.0 software. We used a semi-structured interview guide during a group interview; the interview was transcribed verbatim and analyzed via thematic analysis with the assistance of Microsoft Word software.

Results

Eighty-two nursing school students responded to the survey and 10 student SPs were included in a group interview. Nursing school students rated SPs’ performance favorably. The mean score assigned to the SPs on the performance scale was 4.41 out of 5. The student SPs described the challenges and benefits that they experienced regarding their role. The challenges they described included 1) staying true to my role, 2) overcoming a physically overwhelming role and 3) facing the threat of insecurity. However, the corresponding benefits included 1) gaining rewards, 2) advancing nursing competency and 3) experiencing a sense of accomplishment.

Conclusion

After undergoing training, the SPs performed well. They experienced a variety of challenges and obtained certain benefits. In health care education, recruiting students to serve as SPs is feasible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
9.40%
发文量
180
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education in Practice enables lecturers and practitioners to both share and disseminate evidence that demonstrates the actual practice of education as it is experienced in the realities of their respective work environments. It is supportive of new authors and will be at the forefront in publishing individual and collaborative papers that demonstrate the link between education and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信