内部人持股与违约风险:数据揭示了日本公司的哪些情况?

Humaira Haque, Md. Nurul Kabir, Syeda Humayra Abedin, Mohammad Dulal Miah, Parmendra Sharma
{"title":"内部人持股与违约风险:数据揭示了日本公司的哪些情况?","authors":"Humaira Haque, Md. Nurul Kabir, Syeda Humayra Abedin, Mohammad Dulal Miah, Parmendra Sharma","doi":"10.1108/cafr-06-2023-0059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe ownership structure in Japanese firms has experienced a significant change recently, fueled primarily by regulatory changes. This has important repercussions on corporate performance and risk. This paper examines the impact of insider ownership on the default risk of Japanese firms.Design/methodology/approachWe collected data from the Nikkei Corporate Governance Evaluation System (CGES) database for the period 2004–2019. Our final dataset yields 36,116 firm-year observations. We apply a firm fixed effect model for baseline regression. Endogeneity was checked by applying propensity score matching (PSM) and two-stage least squares (2SLS) techniques. Furthermore, the robustness of baseline regression results was checked using alternative estimation techniques.FindingsResults show a significant positive influence of insider ownership on default risk. Furthermore, ROA volatility and stock price volatility appear to be the major channels through which insider ownership affects a firm’s default risk. We further document that external monitoring mechanisms, including traditional main bank ties, institutional ownership and analyst coverage, are the key risk-mitigating factors.Research limitations/implicationsOur research deals with Japanese firms only. Future research may attempt to analyze the cases of emerging economies. Furthermore, future research might examine the ownership-default risk relationship for financial institutions to see if this relationship differs between financial and nonfinancial firms.Practical implicationsInsider ownership enhances the probability of default. Hence, policymakers may consider instituting a ceiling for insider ownership in Japanese firms. Moreover, we highlight various risk-mediating channels that would help policymakers adopt guidelines for mitigating corporate risk.Originality/valueOur study is the first to investigate the effect of insider ownership on default risk in Japanese settings. Prior studies identified various determinants that affect firms’ default risk. Our study contributes to this stream of literature by examining the impact of insider ownership on default risk and extending the limited literature related to insider ownership.","PeriodicalId":248971,"journal":{"name":"China Accounting and Finance Review","volume":"119 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insider ownership and default risk: What does the data reveal about Japanese firms?\",\"authors\":\"Humaira Haque, Md. Nurul Kabir, Syeda Humayra Abedin, Mohammad Dulal Miah, Parmendra Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/cafr-06-2023-0059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThe ownership structure in Japanese firms has experienced a significant change recently, fueled primarily by regulatory changes. This has important repercussions on corporate performance and risk. This paper examines the impact of insider ownership on the default risk of Japanese firms.Design/methodology/approachWe collected data from the Nikkei Corporate Governance Evaluation System (CGES) database for the period 2004–2019. Our final dataset yields 36,116 firm-year observations. We apply a firm fixed effect model for baseline regression. Endogeneity was checked by applying propensity score matching (PSM) and two-stage least squares (2SLS) techniques. Furthermore, the robustness of baseline regression results was checked using alternative estimation techniques.FindingsResults show a significant positive influence of insider ownership on default risk. Furthermore, ROA volatility and stock price volatility appear to be the major channels through which insider ownership affects a firm’s default risk. We further document that external monitoring mechanisms, including traditional main bank ties, institutional ownership and analyst coverage, are the key risk-mitigating factors.Research limitations/implicationsOur research deals with Japanese firms only. Future research may attempt to analyze the cases of emerging economies. Furthermore, future research might examine the ownership-default risk relationship for financial institutions to see if this relationship differs between financial and nonfinancial firms.Practical implicationsInsider ownership enhances the probability of default. Hence, policymakers may consider instituting a ceiling for insider ownership in Japanese firms. Moreover, we highlight various risk-mediating channels that would help policymakers adopt guidelines for mitigating corporate risk.Originality/valueOur study is the first to investigate the effect of insider ownership on default risk in Japanese settings. Prior studies identified various determinants that affect firms’ default risk. Our study contributes to this stream of literature by examining the impact of insider ownership on default risk and extending the limited literature related to insider ownership.\",\"PeriodicalId\":248971,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"China Accounting and Finance Review\",\"volume\":\"119 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"China Accounting and Finance Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/cafr-06-2023-0059\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Accounting and Finance Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/cafr-06-2023-0059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的最近,日本公司的所有权结构发生了重大变化,主要原因是监管方面的变化。这对公司业绩和风险产生了重要影响。本文研究了内部人持股对日本公司违约风险的影响。我们从日经公司治理评价系统(CGES)数据库中收集了 2004-2019 年期间的数据。我们的最终数据集有 36,116 个公司年度观察值。我们采用公司固定效应模型进行基线回归。通过使用倾向得分匹配(PSM)和两阶段最小二乘法(2SLS)技术检验了内生性。结果表明,内部人持股对违约风险有显著的正向影响。此外,投资回报率波动和股价波动似乎是内部人持股影响公司违约风险的主要渠道。我们进一步证明,外部监督机制,包括传统的主要银行关系、机构所有权和分析师覆盖面,是降低风险的关键因素。未来的研究可以尝试分析新兴经济体的案例。此外,未来的研究可能会考察金融机构的所有权-违约风险关系,以了解这种关系在金融公司和非金融公司之间是否存在差异。因此,政策制定者可以考虑对日本公司的内部人持股比例设定上限。此外,我们还强调了各种风险中介渠道,这些渠道将有助于政策制定者采取降低企业风险的指导方针。原创性/价值我们的研究首次调查了日本环境下内部人持股对违约风险的影响。之前的研究发现了影响公司违约风险的各种决定因素。我们的研究考察了内部人所有权对违约风险的影响,并扩展了与内部人所有权相关的有限文献,从而为这一文献流做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Insider ownership and default risk: What does the data reveal about Japanese firms?
PurposeThe ownership structure in Japanese firms has experienced a significant change recently, fueled primarily by regulatory changes. This has important repercussions on corporate performance and risk. This paper examines the impact of insider ownership on the default risk of Japanese firms.Design/methodology/approachWe collected data from the Nikkei Corporate Governance Evaluation System (CGES) database for the period 2004–2019. Our final dataset yields 36,116 firm-year observations. We apply a firm fixed effect model for baseline regression. Endogeneity was checked by applying propensity score matching (PSM) and two-stage least squares (2SLS) techniques. Furthermore, the robustness of baseline regression results was checked using alternative estimation techniques.FindingsResults show a significant positive influence of insider ownership on default risk. Furthermore, ROA volatility and stock price volatility appear to be the major channels through which insider ownership affects a firm’s default risk. We further document that external monitoring mechanisms, including traditional main bank ties, institutional ownership and analyst coverage, are the key risk-mitigating factors.Research limitations/implicationsOur research deals with Japanese firms only. Future research may attempt to analyze the cases of emerging economies. Furthermore, future research might examine the ownership-default risk relationship for financial institutions to see if this relationship differs between financial and nonfinancial firms.Practical implicationsInsider ownership enhances the probability of default. Hence, policymakers may consider instituting a ceiling for insider ownership in Japanese firms. Moreover, we highlight various risk-mediating channels that would help policymakers adopt guidelines for mitigating corporate risk.Originality/valueOur study is the first to investigate the effect of insider ownership on default risk in Japanese settings. Prior studies identified various determinants that affect firms’ default risk. Our study contributes to this stream of literature by examining the impact of insider ownership on default risk and extending the limited literature related to insider ownership.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信