B-CTMFD 探测器与 Ludlum 42-49B、Fuji NSN3 探测器在铅/混凝土屏蔽配置中的裂变能谱中子源探测方面的性能比较

IF 0.5 Q4 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Yusuke Ota, R. Taleyarkhan
{"title":"B-CTMFD 探测器与 Ludlum 42-49B、Fuji NSN3 探测器在铅/混凝土屏蔽配置中的裂变能谱中子源探测方面的性能比较","authors":"Yusuke Ota, R. Taleyarkhan","doi":"10.1115/1.4065853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper presents the results of neutron detection efficiency and dosimetry between a borated centrifugally tensioned metastable fluid detector (B-CTMFD) vs He-3 Ludlum-42-49B, and, the Fuji NSN3 conducted using a Cf-252 neutron source behind lead and concrete shielding. MCNP code simulations accounted for 3-D effects and derived cpm/mic.Sv/h factors. Ludlum and NSN3 offer fixed sensitivity, but CTMFD offered on-demand sensitivity by varying its Pneg state between 0.3-0.7 MPa. The B-CTMFD demonstrated sensitivity of up to ~22x greater than Ludlum and 5x greater than NSN3, for 0-15 cm Pb shielding, and 0-30 cm concrete shielding; it overcomes the 60% detection penalty inherent in the NB-CTMF-designed only to detect fast-energy neutrons - as described in the companion (Part-1) paper. Unlike the NB-CTMFD, which used 100% DFP (C5H2F10), the B-CTMFD requires the use of an azeotropic mixture of DFP, methanol, and tri-methyl borate (TMB - using natural boron) in 80:4:16 proportion. The B-CTMFD was about 6 times more sensitive than NB-CTMFD under the most heavily shielded condition and taken together, also offered 2-energy bin neutron spectroscopic enablement, together with 22-5x higher absolute efficiency- relative sensitivity compared with the non-spectroscopic Ludlum (He-3) and NSN3 (methane-nitrogen) based detectors. From an intrinsic efficiency standpoint, the B-CTMFD operating at Pneg = 0.7 MPa state, demonstrated even superior ~103x higher intrinsic efficiency over Ludlum and NSN3.","PeriodicalId":16756,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of B-CTMFD Detector Vs Ludlum 42-49B, Fuji NSN3 Detectors for Fission Energy Spectrum Neutron Detection with the Source within Lead/concrete Shielded Configurations\",\"authors\":\"Yusuke Ota, R. Taleyarkhan\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4065853\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper presents the results of neutron detection efficiency and dosimetry between a borated centrifugally tensioned metastable fluid detector (B-CTMFD) vs He-3 Ludlum-42-49B, and, the Fuji NSN3 conducted using a Cf-252 neutron source behind lead and concrete shielding. MCNP code simulations accounted for 3-D effects and derived cpm/mic.Sv/h factors. Ludlum and NSN3 offer fixed sensitivity, but CTMFD offered on-demand sensitivity by varying its Pneg state between 0.3-0.7 MPa. The B-CTMFD demonstrated sensitivity of up to ~22x greater than Ludlum and 5x greater than NSN3, for 0-15 cm Pb shielding, and 0-30 cm concrete shielding; it overcomes the 60% detection penalty inherent in the NB-CTMF-designed only to detect fast-energy neutrons - as described in the companion (Part-1) paper. Unlike the NB-CTMFD, which used 100% DFP (C5H2F10), the B-CTMFD requires the use of an azeotropic mixture of DFP, methanol, and tri-methyl borate (TMB - using natural boron) in 80:4:16 proportion. The B-CTMFD was about 6 times more sensitive than NB-CTMFD under the most heavily shielded condition and taken together, also offered 2-energy bin neutron spectroscopic enablement, together with 22-5x higher absolute efficiency- relative sensitivity compared with the non-spectroscopic Ludlum (He-3) and NSN3 (methane-nitrogen) based detectors. From an intrinsic efficiency standpoint, the B-CTMFD operating at Pneg = 0.7 MPa state, demonstrated even superior ~103x higher intrinsic efficiency over Ludlum and NSN3.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4065853\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4065853","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了硼化离心张力可变流体探测器(B-CTMFD)与氦-3 Ludlum-42-49B 和富士 NSN3 之间的中子探测效率和剂量测定结果,后者使用铅和混凝土屏蔽后的 Cf-252 中子源进行探测。MCNP 代码模拟考虑了三维效应,并得出了 cpm/mic.Sv/h 因子。Ludlum 和 NSN3 提供了固定的灵敏度,但 CTMFD 通过在 0.3-0.7 MPa 之间改变其 Pneg 状态提供了按需灵敏度。在 0-15 厘米铅屏蔽和 0-30 厘米混凝土屏蔽条件下,B-CTMFD 的灵敏度比 Ludlum 高出约 22 倍,比 NSN3 高出 5 倍;它克服了 NB-CTMF 固有的 60% 检测损失,NB-CTMF 只设计用于检测快能中子--如配套论文(第一部分)所述。与使用 100% 二氟化碳(C5H2F10)的 NB-CTMFD 不同,B-CTMFD 需要使用二氟化碳、甲醇和硼酸三甲酯(TMB,使用天然硼)的共沸混合物,比例为 80:4:16。在屏蔽最严密的条件下,B-CTMFD 的灵敏度约为 NB-CTMFD 的 6 倍,同时还提供了 2 能级的中子分光功能,与基于非分光的 Ludlum(氦-3)和 NSN3(甲烷-氮)探测器相比,B-CTMFD 的绝对效率-相对灵敏度高出 22-5 倍。从内在效率的角度来看,在 Pneg = 0.7 MPa 状态下运行的 B-CTMFD 比 Ludlum 和 NSN3 的内在效率高出约 103 倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance of B-CTMFD Detector Vs Ludlum 42-49B, Fuji NSN3 Detectors for Fission Energy Spectrum Neutron Detection with the Source within Lead/concrete Shielded Configurations
This paper presents the results of neutron detection efficiency and dosimetry between a borated centrifugally tensioned metastable fluid detector (B-CTMFD) vs He-3 Ludlum-42-49B, and, the Fuji NSN3 conducted using a Cf-252 neutron source behind lead and concrete shielding. MCNP code simulations accounted for 3-D effects and derived cpm/mic.Sv/h factors. Ludlum and NSN3 offer fixed sensitivity, but CTMFD offered on-demand sensitivity by varying its Pneg state between 0.3-0.7 MPa. The B-CTMFD demonstrated sensitivity of up to ~22x greater than Ludlum and 5x greater than NSN3, for 0-15 cm Pb shielding, and 0-30 cm concrete shielding; it overcomes the 60% detection penalty inherent in the NB-CTMF-designed only to detect fast-energy neutrons - as described in the companion (Part-1) paper. Unlike the NB-CTMFD, which used 100% DFP (C5H2F10), the B-CTMFD requires the use of an azeotropic mixture of DFP, methanol, and tri-methyl borate (TMB - using natural boron) in 80:4:16 proportion. The B-CTMFD was about 6 times more sensitive than NB-CTMFD under the most heavily shielded condition and taken together, also offered 2-energy bin neutron spectroscopic enablement, together with 22-5x higher absolute efficiency- relative sensitivity compared with the non-spectroscopic Ludlum (He-3) and NSN3 (methane-nitrogen) based detectors. From an intrinsic efficiency standpoint, the B-CTMFD operating at Pneg = 0.7 MPa state, demonstrated even superior ~103x higher intrinsic efficiency over Ludlum and NSN3.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science is ASME’s latest title within the energy sector. The publication is for specialists in the nuclear/power engineering areas of industry, academia, and government.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信