寻找包容性多边主义的未来:处于十字路口的世贸组织

IF 0.2 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Mustaqeem De Gama
{"title":"寻找包容性多边主义的未来:处于十字路口的世贸组织","authors":"Mustaqeem De Gama","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2024059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article explores the possible role that the World Trade Organization (WTO) could play to ensure a fair, non-discriminatory, open, transparent and development friendly multilateral landscape. Given its rules-based, consensus driven, and hard law nature, this is a tough task. Can flexible multilateralism work? If so, what form should it take? Are the Joint Initiatives a good example of a possible approach or should different pathways be developed to achieve a consensus on the concept of WTO reform first? The author argues that the term WTO reform bears no common meaning among its members. However, if true WTO reform is to be achieved, a differentiated approach to multilateralism is required. Given the nature and institutional structure of the WTO, this does not conceive of rulemaking by subsets of members advancing some agendas and leaving others behind. One caveat in this context is very clear, in agreeing to a comprehensive revision of the WTO, all issues should be on the table. The paper suggests a dedicated ministerial conference should be held on the future of the WTO to agree on reset 2.0. This pathway is accessible only if all WTO members explicitly agree on a comprehensive remake.\n","PeriodicalId":12728,"journal":{"name":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Search of the Future of Inclusive Multilateralism: The WTO at a Crossroads\",\"authors\":\"Mustaqeem De Gama\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/gtcj2024059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article explores the possible role that the World Trade Organization (WTO) could play to ensure a fair, non-discriminatory, open, transparent and development friendly multilateral landscape. Given its rules-based, consensus driven, and hard law nature, this is a tough task. Can flexible multilateralism work? If so, what form should it take? Are the Joint Initiatives a good example of a possible approach or should different pathways be developed to achieve a consensus on the concept of WTO reform first? The author argues that the term WTO reform bears no common meaning among its members. However, if true WTO reform is to be achieved, a differentiated approach to multilateralism is required. Given the nature and institutional structure of the WTO, this does not conceive of rulemaking by subsets of members advancing some agendas and leaving others behind. One caveat in this context is very clear, in agreeing to a comprehensive revision of the WTO, all issues should be on the table. The paper suggests a dedicated ministerial conference should be held on the future of the WTO to agree on reset 2.0. This pathway is accessible only if all WTO members explicitly agree on a comprehensive remake.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":12728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Trade and Customs Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Trade and Customs Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2024059\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2024059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了世界贸易组织(WTO)在确保公平、非歧视、公开、透明和有利于发展的多边环境方面可能发挥的作用。鉴于世界贸易组织以规则为基础、以共识为动力、以硬性法律为基础的性质,这是一项艰巨的任务。灵活的多边主义能否行得通?如果可以,应采取何种形式?联合倡议 "是否是一种可行方法的良好范例,还是应该制定不同的途径,首先就世贸组织改革的概念达成共识?作者认为,世贸组织改革一词在其成员之间没有共同的含义。然而,如果要实现真正的世贸组织改革,就需要对多边主义采取区别对待的方法。鉴于世贸组织的性质和体制结构,这并不意味着由部分成员制定规则来推进某些议程,而将其他议程抛在后面。在这种情况下,有一点是非常明确的,即在同意对世贸组织进行全面修订时,所有问题都应摆在桌面上。本文建议就世贸组织的未来召开一次专门的部长级会议,就重启 2.0 达成一致。只有在所有世贸组织成员明确同意全面改组的情况下,这条道路才是通畅的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In Search of the Future of Inclusive Multilateralism: The WTO at a Crossroads
This article explores the possible role that the World Trade Organization (WTO) could play to ensure a fair, non-discriminatory, open, transparent and development friendly multilateral landscape. Given its rules-based, consensus driven, and hard law nature, this is a tough task. Can flexible multilateralism work? If so, what form should it take? Are the Joint Initiatives a good example of a possible approach or should different pathways be developed to achieve a consensus on the concept of WTO reform first? The author argues that the term WTO reform bears no common meaning among its members. However, if true WTO reform is to be achieved, a differentiated approach to multilateralism is required. Given the nature and institutional structure of the WTO, this does not conceive of rulemaking by subsets of members advancing some agendas and leaving others behind. One caveat in this context is very clear, in agreeing to a comprehensive revision of the WTO, all issues should be on the table. The paper suggests a dedicated ministerial conference should be held on the future of the WTO to agree on reset 2.0. This pathway is accessible only if all WTO members explicitly agree on a comprehensive remake.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Trade and Customs Journal
Global Trade and Customs Journal INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信