Mohamed Mohamed Moussa Elwan, Mohamed Salah Eldin Shawky, El Sayed Bayomy
{"title":"治疗复发性肩关节脱位的拉塔杰特手术与游离髂骨移植的比较研究","authors":"Mohamed Mohamed Moussa Elwan, Mohamed Salah Eldin Shawky, El Sayed Bayomy","doi":"10.4103/jajs.jajs_77_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The most common form of shoulder dislocation is the recurrent anterior traumatic type. Latarjet and Eden Hybinette are the two competing techniques in reconstructing significant bone loss accompanying this type.\n \n \n \n The aim is to evaluate the functional results in the management of recurrent shoulder dislocation with bone loss by comparing Latarjet and Eden Hybinette techniques.\n \n \n \n A prospective, randomized controlled trial was performed on forty adult patients suffering from recurrent shoulder dislocations. Two groups (a total of forty patients; twenty iliac graft cases and twenty Latarjet controls) were performed in a randomized method. We compared the two groups; clinical evaluation was completed before surgery and at least 1 year postoperatively, by using the modified Rowe score which consists of pain level, stability, motion loss, and limitation of function. Satisfactory results included excellent and good results, while unsatisfactory results included fair and poor results. Adverse events were prospectively recorded. CT studies were performed to assess the radiographic result preoperatively, immediately-postoperatively, and at final follow-up visits.\n \n \n \n Both groups did not differ significantly in either the clinical or the radiological aspects (P > 0.05) except for more limited range of motion (ROM) (external and internal rotation) in the Latarjet group at the final follow-up (P < 0.05). One case in the Latarjet group had recurrent dislocation due to tramadol fits. Two cases in each group had anterior apprehension only. Donor-site sensory disturbances were reported in 10% of the iliac group patients. Computed tomography revealed a larger graft size in the iliac group.\n \n \n \n Both Latarjet and Eden Hybinette can be used as reconstructive surgeries in restoring critical bone loss accompanying shoulder dislocations; they did not show significant differences except for the more limited external and internal rotation motions in the Latarjet group.\n","PeriodicalId":38088,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study Between Latarjet Procedure Versus Free Iliac Graft in the Management of Recurrent Shoulder Dislocation\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Mohamed Moussa Elwan, Mohamed Salah Eldin Shawky, El Sayed Bayomy\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jajs.jajs_77_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n The most common form of shoulder dislocation is the recurrent anterior traumatic type. Latarjet and Eden Hybinette are the two competing techniques in reconstructing significant bone loss accompanying this type.\\n \\n \\n \\n The aim is to evaluate the functional results in the management of recurrent shoulder dislocation with bone loss by comparing Latarjet and Eden Hybinette techniques.\\n \\n \\n \\n A prospective, randomized controlled trial was performed on forty adult patients suffering from recurrent shoulder dislocations. Two groups (a total of forty patients; twenty iliac graft cases and twenty Latarjet controls) were performed in a randomized method. We compared the two groups; clinical evaluation was completed before surgery and at least 1 year postoperatively, by using the modified Rowe score which consists of pain level, stability, motion loss, and limitation of function. Satisfactory results included excellent and good results, while unsatisfactory results included fair and poor results. Adverse events were prospectively recorded. CT studies were performed to assess the radiographic result preoperatively, immediately-postoperatively, and at final follow-up visits.\\n \\n \\n \\n Both groups did not differ significantly in either the clinical or the radiological aspects (P > 0.05) except for more limited range of motion (ROM) (external and internal rotation) in the Latarjet group at the final follow-up (P < 0.05). One case in the Latarjet group had recurrent dislocation due to tramadol fits. Two cases in each group had anterior apprehension only. Donor-site sensory disturbances were reported in 10% of the iliac group patients. Computed tomography revealed a larger graft size in the iliac group.\\n \\n \\n \\n Both Latarjet and Eden Hybinette can be used as reconstructive surgeries in restoring critical bone loss accompanying shoulder dislocations; they did not show significant differences except for the more limited external and internal rotation motions in the Latarjet group.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":38088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jajs.jajs_77_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jajs.jajs_77_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative Study Between Latarjet Procedure Versus Free Iliac Graft in the Management of Recurrent Shoulder Dislocation
The most common form of shoulder dislocation is the recurrent anterior traumatic type. Latarjet and Eden Hybinette are the two competing techniques in reconstructing significant bone loss accompanying this type.
The aim is to evaluate the functional results in the management of recurrent shoulder dislocation with bone loss by comparing Latarjet and Eden Hybinette techniques.
A prospective, randomized controlled trial was performed on forty adult patients suffering from recurrent shoulder dislocations. Two groups (a total of forty patients; twenty iliac graft cases and twenty Latarjet controls) were performed in a randomized method. We compared the two groups; clinical evaluation was completed before surgery and at least 1 year postoperatively, by using the modified Rowe score which consists of pain level, stability, motion loss, and limitation of function. Satisfactory results included excellent and good results, while unsatisfactory results included fair and poor results. Adverse events were prospectively recorded. CT studies were performed to assess the radiographic result preoperatively, immediately-postoperatively, and at final follow-up visits.
Both groups did not differ significantly in either the clinical or the radiological aspects (P > 0.05) except for more limited range of motion (ROM) (external and internal rotation) in the Latarjet group at the final follow-up (P < 0.05). One case in the Latarjet group had recurrent dislocation due to tramadol fits. Two cases in each group had anterior apprehension only. Donor-site sensory disturbances were reported in 10% of the iliac group patients. Computed tomography revealed a larger graft size in the iliac group.
Both Latarjet and Eden Hybinette can be used as reconstructive surgeries in restoring critical bone loss accompanying shoulder dislocations; they did not show significant differences except for the more limited external and internal rotation motions in the Latarjet group.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery (JAJS) is committed to bring forth scientific manuscripts in the form of original research articles, current concept reviews, meta-analyses, case reports and letters to the editor. The focus of the Journal is to present wide-ranging, multi-disciplinary perspectives on the problems of the joints that are amenable with Arthroscopy and Arthroplasty. Though Arthroscopy and Arthroplasty entail surgical procedures, the Journal shall not restrict itself to these purely surgical procedures and will also encompass pharmacological, rehabilitative and physical measures that can prevent or postpone the execution of a surgical procedure. The Journal will also publish scientific research related to tissues other than joints that would ultimately have an effect on the joint function.