儿童癌症易感综合征基因检测:SIOPE 主基因组工作组 2022 年会议的争议和建议

Jette J. Bakhuizen , Franck Bourdeaut , Karin A.W. Wadt , Christian P. Kratz , Marjolijn C.J. Jongmans , Nicolas Waespe , SIOPE Host Genome Working Group
{"title":"儿童癌症易感综合征基因检测:SIOPE 主基因组工作组 2022 年会议的争议和建议","authors":"Jette J. Bakhuizen ,&nbsp;Franck Bourdeaut ,&nbsp;Karin A.W. Wadt ,&nbsp;Christian P. Kratz ,&nbsp;Marjolijn C.J. Jongmans ,&nbsp;Nicolas Waespe ,&nbsp;SIOPE Host Genome Working Group","doi":"10.1016/j.ejcped.2024.100176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Cancer Predisposition Syndromes (CPSs) have been identified in 7–15 % of children with cancer. The possibilities for germline genetic testing have increased in recent years, presenting new opportunities but also challenges. There is currently no consensus on germline genetic testing in children with cancer in diagnostic settings.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The International Society of Pediatric Oncology Europe (SIOPE) Host Genome Working Group used a consensus development conference method to reach agreement on four key topics: Who do we test? Which genes do we test? What do we disclose? How do we evaluate the benefits of testing?</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The Working Group members agreed that: (1) All children with cancer should undergo clinical screening for their risk of harboring a CPS. (2) Targeted genetic testing based on clinical indication is recommended. Comprehensive CPS gene panels with more than 100–150 genes for all children with cancer should preferably be evaluated within research settings. (3) Smaller actionable gene panels can be considered including genes supporting diagnosis or influencing treatment decisions. (4) Clear pre-test information and consenting processes that highlight potential outcomes and implications of germline genetic testing are imperative. (5) Consequences of genetic testing, treatment adaption, and tumor surveillance in children with CPSs, including economic impact and psychosocial factors, should be further explored.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These consensus-based recommendations provide guidance on germline genetic testing in children with cancer. Regular review of these recommendations is essential. Collaboration and the use of data sharing platforms can further improve screening procedures and its impact on care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94314,"journal":{"name":"EJC paediatric oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772610X24000357/pdfft?md5=cdba34fb344e6fd6f94b5d8d42d104d0&pid=1-s2.0-S2772610X24000357-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genetic testing for childhood cancer predisposition syndromes: Controversies and recommendations from the SIOPE Host Genome Working Group meeting 2022\",\"authors\":\"Jette J. Bakhuizen ,&nbsp;Franck Bourdeaut ,&nbsp;Karin A.W. Wadt ,&nbsp;Christian P. Kratz ,&nbsp;Marjolijn C.J. Jongmans ,&nbsp;Nicolas Waespe ,&nbsp;SIOPE Host Genome Working Group\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejcped.2024.100176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Cancer Predisposition Syndromes (CPSs) have been identified in 7–15 % of children with cancer. The possibilities for germline genetic testing have increased in recent years, presenting new opportunities but also challenges. There is currently no consensus on germline genetic testing in children with cancer in diagnostic settings.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The International Society of Pediatric Oncology Europe (SIOPE) Host Genome Working Group used a consensus development conference method to reach agreement on four key topics: Who do we test? Which genes do we test? What do we disclose? How do we evaluate the benefits of testing?</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The Working Group members agreed that: (1) All children with cancer should undergo clinical screening for their risk of harboring a CPS. (2) Targeted genetic testing based on clinical indication is recommended. Comprehensive CPS gene panels with more than 100–150 genes for all children with cancer should preferably be evaluated within research settings. (3) Smaller actionable gene panels can be considered including genes supporting diagnosis or influencing treatment decisions. (4) Clear pre-test information and consenting processes that highlight potential outcomes and implications of germline genetic testing are imperative. (5) Consequences of genetic testing, treatment adaption, and tumor surveillance in children with CPSs, including economic impact and psychosocial factors, should be further explored.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These consensus-based recommendations provide guidance on germline genetic testing in children with cancer. Regular review of these recommendations is essential. Collaboration and the use of data sharing platforms can further improve screening procedures and its impact on care.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94314,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EJC paediatric oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772610X24000357/pdfft?md5=cdba34fb344e6fd6f94b5d8d42d104d0&pid=1-s2.0-S2772610X24000357-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EJC paediatric oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772610X24000357\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJC paediatric oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772610X24000357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景在 7-15% 的癌症患儿中发现了癌症易感综合征(CPS)。近年来,进行种系基因检测的可能性越来越大,这带来了新的机遇,但也带来了挑战。方法国际儿科肿瘤学会欧洲分会(SIOPE)宿主基因组工作组采用共识发展会议的方法,就四个关键议题达成了一致意见:我们对谁进行检测?我们检测哪些基因?我们披露什么?我们如何评估检测的益处?(1) 所有癌症患儿都应接受临床筛查,以确定他们是否有携带 CPS 的风险。(2) 建议根据临床指征进行有针对性的基因检测。针对所有癌症患儿的超过 100-150 个基因的全面 CPS 基因面板最好在研究环境中进行评估。(3) 可考虑较小的可操作基因组,包括支持诊断或影响治疗决定的基因。(4) 必须提供明确的检测前信息和同意程序,强调种系基因检测的潜在结果和影响。(5) 应进一步探讨 CPSs 患儿基因检测、治疗适应性和肿瘤监测的后果,包括经济影响和社会心理因素。 结论这些基于共识的建议为癌症患儿的种系基因检测提供了指导。定期审查这些建议至关重要。合作和使用数据共享平台可进一步改进筛查程序及其对护理的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Genetic testing for childhood cancer predisposition syndromes: Controversies and recommendations from the SIOPE Host Genome Working Group meeting 2022

Background

Cancer Predisposition Syndromes (CPSs) have been identified in 7–15 % of children with cancer. The possibilities for germline genetic testing have increased in recent years, presenting new opportunities but also challenges. There is currently no consensus on germline genetic testing in children with cancer in diagnostic settings.

Methods

The International Society of Pediatric Oncology Europe (SIOPE) Host Genome Working Group used a consensus development conference method to reach agreement on four key topics: Who do we test? Which genes do we test? What do we disclose? How do we evaluate the benefits of testing?

Results

The Working Group members agreed that: (1) All children with cancer should undergo clinical screening for their risk of harboring a CPS. (2) Targeted genetic testing based on clinical indication is recommended. Comprehensive CPS gene panels with more than 100–150 genes for all children with cancer should preferably be evaluated within research settings. (3) Smaller actionable gene panels can be considered including genes supporting diagnosis or influencing treatment decisions. (4) Clear pre-test information and consenting processes that highlight potential outcomes and implications of germline genetic testing are imperative. (5) Consequences of genetic testing, treatment adaption, and tumor surveillance in children with CPSs, including economic impact and psychosocial factors, should be further explored.

Conclusions

These consensus-based recommendations provide guidance on germline genetic testing in children with cancer. Regular review of these recommendations is essential. Collaboration and the use of data sharing platforms can further improve screening procedures and its impact on care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信