{"title":"模拟髓内压对自粘树脂复合材料与牙本质微拉伸粘接强度的影响","authors":"Y. El-Bouhi","doi":"10.21608/edj.2024.282398.3004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/Aim: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of a self-adhesive flowable resin composite (Vertise Flow) under simulated intrapulpal pressure IPP) and compare it to a conventional adhesive and flowable composite combination. Materials and Methods: Thirty human molars were used. IPP of 15 cm H 2 O was applied. Group I (control): Adeper Easy One + Z 250 (composite), Group II: Etching + Adeper Easy One + Z 250, Group III: Adeper Easy One + flowable composite + Z 250, Group IV: Etching + Adeper Easy One + flowable composite + Z 250, Group V: Vertise Flow + Z 250, and Group VI: Etching + Vertise Flow + Z 250. Data analysis employed one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test for inter-group comparisons (at P < 0.05). Results: Etching the dentin prior to bonding with Adeper Easy One significantly increased µTBS to 25.12 MPa (S.D.: 5.78 MPa). Application of flowable composite resulted in a µTBS of 13.62 MPa (S.D. = 5.50 MPa), not statistically different. Group IV exhibited the highest mean µTBS (31.26 MPa, S.D. = 6.04 MPa). Group V showed the lowest mean µTBS (8.89 MPa, S.D. = 0.97 MPa). Etching before application of Vertise Flow in Group VI showed significant increased µTBS to 13.83 MPa (S.D. = 1.33 MPa) Conclusion: Dentin conditioning before application of Vetise Flow is necessary to produce a µTBS comparable to that of conventional approach of self-etch adhesive.","PeriodicalId":11504,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian dental journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Simulated Intrapulpal Pressure on Microtensile Bond Strength of Self-adhesive Resin Composite to Dentin\",\"authors\":\"Y. El-Bouhi\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/edj.2024.282398.3004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background/Aim: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of a self-adhesive flowable resin composite (Vertise Flow) under simulated intrapulpal pressure IPP) and compare it to a conventional adhesive and flowable composite combination. Materials and Methods: Thirty human molars were used. IPP of 15 cm H 2 O was applied. Group I (control): Adeper Easy One + Z 250 (composite), Group II: Etching + Adeper Easy One + Z 250, Group III: Adeper Easy One + flowable composite + Z 250, Group IV: Etching + Adeper Easy One + flowable composite + Z 250, Group V: Vertise Flow + Z 250, and Group VI: Etching + Vertise Flow + Z 250. Data analysis employed one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test for inter-group comparisons (at P < 0.05). Results: Etching the dentin prior to bonding with Adeper Easy One significantly increased µTBS to 25.12 MPa (S.D.: 5.78 MPa). Application of flowable composite resulted in a µTBS of 13.62 MPa (S.D. = 5.50 MPa), not statistically different. Group IV exhibited the highest mean µTBS (31.26 MPa, S.D. = 6.04 MPa). Group V showed the lowest mean µTBS (8.89 MPa, S.D. = 0.97 MPa). Etching before application of Vertise Flow in Group VI showed significant increased µTBS to 13.83 MPa (S.D. = 1.33 MPa) Conclusion: Dentin conditioning before application of Vetise Flow is necessary to produce a µTBS comparable to that of conventional approach of self-etch adhesive.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian dental journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian dental journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2024.282398.3004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2024.282398.3004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景/目的:这项体外研究旨在评估自粘性可流动树脂复合材料(Vertise Flow)在模拟龈内压 IPP 下的微张力粘结强度(µTBS),并将其与传统粘合剂和可流动复合材料组合进行比较。材料和方法:使用 30 颗人类臼齿。施加 15 cm H 2 O 的 IPP。第一组(对照组):第二组:蚀刻 + Adeper Easy One + Z 250;第三组:Adeper Easy One + 可流动复合材料 + Z 250;第四组:蚀刻 + Adeper Easy One + 可流动复合材料 + Z 250;第五组:Vertise Flow + Z 250;第六组:蚀刻 + Vertise Flow + Z 250。数据分析采用单因素方差分析和 Tukey 后检验进行组间比较(P < 0.05)。结果在使用 Adeper Easy One 进行粘接之前对牙本质进行蚀刻,可将 µTBS 显著提高至 25.12 兆帕(标准偏差:5.78 兆帕)。使用可流动复合材料后,µTBS 为 13.62 兆帕(标准差 = 5.50 兆帕),无统计学差异。第四组的平均 µTBS 值最高(31.26 兆帕,S.D. = 6.04 兆帕)。第五组的平均 µTBS 值最低(8.89 兆帕,标准差 = 0.97 兆帕)。第六组在使用 Vertise Flow 前进行的蚀刻显示 µTBS 显著增加到 13.83 兆帕(S.D. = 1.33 兆帕):在使用 Vetise Flow 之前有必要对牙本质进行调节,以获得与传统自酸蚀粘合剂方法相当的 µTBS 值。
Effect of Simulated Intrapulpal Pressure on Microtensile Bond Strength of Self-adhesive Resin Composite to Dentin
Background/Aim: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of a self-adhesive flowable resin composite (Vertise Flow) under simulated intrapulpal pressure IPP) and compare it to a conventional adhesive and flowable composite combination. Materials and Methods: Thirty human molars were used. IPP of 15 cm H 2 O was applied. Group I (control): Adeper Easy One + Z 250 (composite), Group II: Etching + Adeper Easy One + Z 250, Group III: Adeper Easy One + flowable composite + Z 250, Group IV: Etching + Adeper Easy One + flowable composite + Z 250, Group V: Vertise Flow + Z 250, and Group VI: Etching + Vertise Flow + Z 250. Data analysis employed one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test for inter-group comparisons (at P < 0.05). Results: Etching the dentin prior to bonding with Adeper Easy One significantly increased µTBS to 25.12 MPa (S.D.: 5.78 MPa). Application of flowable composite resulted in a µTBS of 13.62 MPa (S.D. = 5.50 MPa), not statistically different. Group IV exhibited the highest mean µTBS (31.26 MPa, S.D. = 6.04 MPa). Group V showed the lowest mean µTBS (8.89 MPa, S.D. = 0.97 MPa). Etching before application of Vertise Flow in Group VI showed significant increased µTBS to 13.83 MPa (S.D. = 1.33 MPa) Conclusion: Dentin conditioning before application of Vetise Flow is necessary to produce a µTBS comparable to that of conventional approach of self-etch adhesive.