手部和腕部神经节囊肿手术切除与平卧位手术治疗的比较研究

Yahya Kamal
{"title":"手部和腕部神经节囊肿手术切除与平卧位手术治疗的比较研究","authors":"Yahya Kamal","doi":"10.21608/ejsur.2024.357106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Target: The goal of the study was to compare the outcomes of two different approaches to treating hand and wrist ganglia: the lay-open procedure and typical surgical excision. Patients and Methods: This study was conducted at the surgery department of the Alqureen General Hospital in Sharkia, Egypt, between January and December of 2023. This survey was completed by 40 individuals who had wrist or hand ganglions. Patients were divided into two categories based on casual distribution. Traditional surgical excision was used to treat one kind (group A), whereas a lay-open technique was used to treat the other kind (group B). Recurrences were noted during the 6-month proceedings for both. Results: The typical surgical excision took much longer to complete (61.2 vs. 23.7 min; P<0.001 ) than the lay-open procedure. There was a considerable variance between the two sorts with relation to the operating maneuver complexity ( P<0.001 ). Group A experienced more satisfied postoperative complications. However, when it came to wound infection and the appearance of minor postoperative discomfort, the difference between the two types was not statistically significant ( P=0.3 ). Patients in type B reported higher levels of satisfaction (90 vs. 45%; P<0.001 ). Conclusion: When compared with typical surgical excision for the treatment of hand and wrist ganglion cysts, the lay-open procedure appears to be preferable.","PeriodicalId":22550,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Journal of Surgery","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative research for surgical excision and lay-open maneuver in treatment of hand and wrist ganglion cyst\",\"authors\":\"Yahya Kamal\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/ejsur.2024.357106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Target: The goal of the study was to compare the outcomes of two different approaches to treating hand and wrist ganglia: the lay-open procedure and typical surgical excision. Patients and Methods: This study was conducted at the surgery department of the Alqureen General Hospital in Sharkia, Egypt, between January and December of 2023. This survey was completed by 40 individuals who had wrist or hand ganglions. Patients were divided into two categories based on casual distribution. Traditional surgical excision was used to treat one kind (group A), whereas a lay-open technique was used to treat the other kind (group B). Recurrences were noted during the 6-month proceedings for both. Results: The typical surgical excision took much longer to complete (61.2 vs. 23.7 min; P<0.001 ) than the lay-open procedure. There was a considerable variance between the two sorts with relation to the operating maneuver complexity ( P<0.001 ). Group A experienced more satisfied postoperative complications. However, when it came to wound infection and the appearance of minor postoperative discomfort, the difference between the two types was not statistically significant ( P=0.3 ). Patients in type B reported higher levels of satisfaction (90 vs. 45%; P<0.001 ). Conclusion: When compared with typical surgical excision for the treatment of hand and wrist ganglion cysts, the lay-open procedure appears to be preferable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Egyptian Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Egyptian Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejsur.2024.357106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejsur.2024.357106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标该研究的目的是比较两种不同的手部和腕部神经节治疗方法的效果:平卧开颅术和典型的手术切除术。患者和方法:本研究于 2023 年 1 月至 12 月期间在埃及沙尔基亚的 Alqureen 综合医院外科进行。这项调查由 40 名患有腕部或手部神经节的患者完成。根据患者的分布情况,将其分为两类。其中一类(A 组)采用传统手术切除术,另一类(B 组)采用非开放技术。在为期 6 个月的治疗过程中,对两组患者的复发情况进行了记录。结果显示典型的外科切除术比非开放手术耗时更长(61.2 分钟对 23.7 分钟;P<0.001)。在手术操作的复杂程度上,两组之间存在相当大的差异(P<0.001)。A组术后并发症的满意度更高。然而,在伤口感染和术后出现轻微不适方面,两种类型之间的差异没有统计学意义(P=0.3)。B 组患者的满意度更高(90% 对 45%;P<0.001)。结论:与治疗手部和腕部神经节囊肿的典型手术切除术相比,非开腹手术似乎更为可取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative research for surgical excision and lay-open maneuver in treatment of hand and wrist ganglion cyst
Target: The goal of the study was to compare the outcomes of two different approaches to treating hand and wrist ganglia: the lay-open procedure and typical surgical excision. Patients and Methods: This study was conducted at the surgery department of the Alqureen General Hospital in Sharkia, Egypt, between January and December of 2023. This survey was completed by 40 individuals who had wrist or hand ganglions. Patients were divided into two categories based on casual distribution. Traditional surgical excision was used to treat one kind (group A), whereas a lay-open technique was used to treat the other kind (group B). Recurrences were noted during the 6-month proceedings for both. Results: The typical surgical excision took much longer to complete (61.2 vs. 23.7 min; P<0.001 ) than the lay-open procedure. There was a considerable variance between the two sorts with relation to the operating maneuver complexity ( P<0.001 ). Group A experienced more satisfied postoperative complications. However, when it came to wound infection and the appearance of minor postoperative discomfort, the difference between the two types was not statistically significant ( P=0.3 ). Patients in type B reported higher levels of satisfaction (90 vs. 45%; P<0.001 ). Conclusion: When compared with typical surgical excision for the treatment of hand and wrist ganglion cysts, the lay-open procedure appears to be preferable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信