膀胱内注射布比卡因可减轻经尿道手术后导尿管相关的膀胱不适和下尿路症状:随机对照试验

IF 1.3 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Jithesh Purushothaman, S. Kalra, L. Dorairajan, S. Selvarajan, K. S. Sreerag, Deepanshu Aggarwal
{"title":"膀胱内注射布比卡因可减轻经尿道手术后导尿管相关的膀胱不适和下尿路症状:随机对照试验","authors":"Jithesh Purushothaman, S. Kalra, L. Dorairajan, S. Selvarajan, K. S. Sreerag, Deepanshu Aggarwal","doi":"10.4103/iju.iju_431_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The objectives of this study were to investigate the efficacy and safety of intravesical bupivacaine instillation in reducing catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD) and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) after transurethral surgery.\n \n \n \n The study enrolled 100 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I–III patients aged ≥18 years undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate or transurethral resection of the bladder tumor, randomly assigned to Group B (intravesical bupivacaine) or Group S (saline). Double blinding was employed. Independent variables included demographics, surgery type, ASA grade, and intervention details. Dependent variables comprised CRBD severity, Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC), Pelvic Pain Urgency Frequency (PUF), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, need for additional analgesics, and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). SPSS version 19 was used for analysis with a significance level of P < 0.05. Side effects such as hematuria were also recorded.\n \n \n \n Group B reported significantly lower “moderate” CRBD immediately (2% vs. 40%, P < 0.001) and at 12 h (0% vs. 18%, P = 0.003) post-instillation compared to Group S and also required fewer additional analgesics (4% vs. 46%). The PPBC at catheter removal also favored Group B (P = 0.003) and day 1 (P < 0.001). The PUF scores were also significantly lower in Group B at catheter removal (P = 0.001) and at day 1 (P = 0.028). The IPSS was also significantly lower in the Group B on day 1 (P = 0.003) and 7 (P = 0.001). The VAS scores also favored the Group B consistently and although the side effects were higher in Group B but this was not statistically significant.\n \n \n \n Intravesical bupivacaine administration has the potential to alleviate CRBD and postoperative LUTS following lower urinary tract transurethral electrosurgery. The study’s findings underscore the importance of personalized pain management strategies in optimizing the patient comfort during the postoperative recovery.\n","PeriodicalId":47352,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intravesical bupivacaine in reducing catheter-related bladder discomfort and lower urinary tract symptoms after transurethral surgery: A randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Jithesh Purushothaman, S. Kalra, L. Dorairajan, S. Selvarajan, K. S. Sreerag, Deepanshu Aggarwal\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/iju.iju_431_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n The objectives of this study were to investigate the efficacy and safety of intravesical bupivacaine instillation in reducing catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD) and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) after transurethral surgery.\\n \\n \\n \\n The study enrolled 100 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I–III patients aged ≥18 years undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate or transurethral resection of the bladder tumor, randomly assigned to Group B (intravesical bupivacaine) or Group S (saline). Double blinding was employed. Independent variables included demographics, surgery type, ASA grade, and intervention details. Dependent variables comprised CRBD severity, Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC), Pelvic Pain Urgency Frequency (PUF), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, need for additional analgesics, and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). SPSS version 19 was used for analysis with a significance level of P < 0.05. Side effects such as hematuria were also recorded.\\n \\n \\n \\n Group B reported significantly lower “moderate” CRBD immediately (2% vs. 40%, P < 0.001) and at 12 h (0% vs. 18%, P = 0.003) post-instillation compared to Group S and also required fewer additional analgesics (4% vs. 46%). The PPBC at catheter removal also favored Group B (P = 0.003) and day 1 (P < 0.001). The PUF scores were also significantly lower in Group B at catheter removal (P = 0.001) and at day 1 (P = 0.028). The IPSS was also significantly lower in the Group B on day 1 (P = 0.003) and 7 (P = 0.001). The VAS scores also favored the Group B consistently and although the side effects were higher in Group B but this was not statistically significant.\\n \\n \\n \\n Intravesical bupivacaine administration has the potential to alleviate CRBD and postoperative LUTS following lower urinary tract transurethral electrosurgery. The study’s findings underscore the importance of personalized pain management strategies in optimizing the patient comfort during the postoperative recovery.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":47352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/iju.iju_431_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/iju.iju_431_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨膀胱内注射布比卡因对减轻经尿道手术后导尿管相关膀胱不适(CRBD)和下尿路症状(LUTS)的有效性和安全性。 该研究招募了100名年龄≥18岁、接受经尿道前列腺切除术或经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)I-III级患者,随机分配到B组(膀胱内注射布比卡因)或S组(生理盐水)。采用双盲法。独立变量包括人口统计学、手术类型、ASA 分级和干预细节。因变量包括 CRBD 严重程度、患者对膀胱状况的感知(PPBC)、盆腔疼痛急迫频率(PUF)、疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)、额外镇痛药需求和国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)。分析采用 SPSS 19 版,显著性水平为 P <0.05。血尿等副作用也被记录在案。 与 S 组相比,B 组报告的 "中度 "CRBD 明显较低(2% 对 40%,P < 0.001),在植入后 12 小时内也明显较低(0% 对 18%,P = 0.003),需要额外镇痛药的比例也较低(4% 对 46%)。拔除导管时的 PPBC 也有利于 B 组(P = 0.003)和第 1 天(P < 0.001)。在拔除导管时(P = 0.001)和拔管第 1 天(P = 0.028),B 组的 PUF 评分也明显较低。第 1 天(P = 0.003)和第 7 天(P = 0.001),B 组的 IPSS 也明显较低。VAS 评分也始终偏向于 B 组,虽然 B 组的副作用更高,但没有统计学意义。 膀胱内注射布比卡因有可能减轻下尿路经尿道电切术后的 CRBD 和术后 LUTS。该研究结果强调了个性化疼痛管理策略在优化患者术后恢复舒适度方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intravesical bupivacaine in reducing catheter-related bladder discomfort and lower urinary tract symptoms after transurethral surgery: A randomized controlled trial
The objectives of this study were to investigate the efficacy and safety of intravesical bupivacaine instillation in reducing catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD) and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) after transurethral surgery. The study enrolled 100 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I–III patients aged ≥18 years undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate or transurethral resection of the bladder tumor, randomly assigned to Group B (intravesical bupivacaine) or Group S (saline). Double blinding was employed. Independent variables included demographics, surgery type, ASA grade, and intervention details. Dependent variables comprised CRBD severity, Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC), Pelvic Pain Urgency Frequency (PUF), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, need for additional analgesics, and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). SPSS version 19 was used for analysis with a significance level of P < 0.05. Side effects such as hematuria were also recorded. Group B reported significantly lower “moderate” CRBD immediately (2% vs. 40%, P < 0.001) and at 12 h (0% vs. 18%, P = 0.003) post-instillation compared to Group S and also required fewer additional analgesics (4% vs. 46%). The PPBC at catheter removal also favored Group B (P = 0.003) and day 1 (P < 0.001). The PUF scores were also significantly lower in Group B at catheter removal (P = 0.001) and at day 1 (P = 0.028). The IPSS was also significantly lower in the Group B on day 1 (P = 0.003) and 7 (P = 0.001). The VAS scores also favored the Group B consistently and although the side effects were higher in Group B but this was not statistically significant. Intravesical bupivacaine administration has the potential to alleviate CRBD and postoperative LUTS following lower urinary tract transurethral electrosurgery. The study’s findings underscore the importance of personalized pain management strategies in optimizing the patient comfort during the postoperative recovery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Urology
Indian Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
33 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Urology-IJU (ISSN 0970-1591) is official publication of the Urological Society of India. The journal is published Quarterly. Bibliographic listings: The journal is indexed with Abstracts on Hygiene and Communicable Diseases, CAB Abstracts, Caspur, DOAJ, EBSCO Publishing’s Electronic Databases, Excerpta Medica / EMBASE, Expanded Academic ASAP, Genamics JournalSeek, Global Health, Google Scholar, Health & Wellness Research Center, Health Reference Center Academic, Hinari, Index Copernicus, IndMed, OpenJGate, PubMed, Pubmed Central, Scimago Journal Ranking, SCOLOAR, SCOPUS, SIIC databases, SNEMB, Tropical Diseases Bulletin, Ulrich’s International Periodical Directory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信