NB-CTMFD 探测器与 Ludlum 42-49B 和 Fuji NSN3 探测器在铅/混凝土屏蔽配置内用于硬(Am-Be)和软(Cf-252 裂变)能谱中子源时的性能比较

IF 0.5 Q4 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Yusuke Ota, S. Ozerov, R. Taleyarkhan
{"title":"NB-CTMFD 探测器与 Ludlum 42-49B 和 Fuji NSN3 探测器在铅/混凝土屏蔽配置内用于硬(Am-Be)和软(Cf-252 裂变)能谱中子源时的性能比较","authors":"Yusuke Ota, S. Ozerov, R. Taleyarkhan","doi":"10.1115/1.4065852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents results of neutron detection efficiency and dosimetry between a non-borated centrifugally tensioned metastable fluid detector (NB-CTMFD) configured to detect fast (>0.1 MeV) vs. He-3 based Ludlum-42-49B and the Fuji NSN3, detectors behind various levels of lead and concrete shieldin-together with MCNP code simulations to account for 3-D effects and to relate the detection sensitivity with the dose rate. The MCNP results for neutron energy spectra were validated vs. experimental measurements using the H*TMFD. While Ludlum and NSN3 operate at a fixed sensitivity, the NB-CTMFD detector offers variable sensitivity by varying the tensioned metastable negative pressure (Pneg) from 0.3 MPa to 0.7 MPa. The NB-CTMFD (configured for fast: > 0.2 MeV neutron detection) offered relative sensitivity enhancements of up to 15x greater than the Ludlum and ~5x greater than the NSN3 detector for low shielding thicknesses. For larger thicknesses, the advantage factor for NB-CTMFD unit reduces with increased fast neutron removal via down-scattering, which benefits the Ludlum and NSN3 detectors. Our companion paper compares performance with a Cf-252 spectrum using a borated CTMFD (covering dual energy bins: thermal-epithermal and fast energy ranges) wherein, it is demonstrated that the advantage factor for the CTMFD (if borated) remains elevated at the 5-10x higher level for low and large shielding thicknesses and soft and hard neutron spectra.","PeriodicalId":16756,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of NB-CTMFD detector vs Ludlum 42-49B, and Fuji NSN3 detectors for hard (Am-Be) and soft (Cf-252 fission) energy spectra neutron sources within lead/concrete shielded configurations\",\"authors\":\"Yusuke Ota, S. Ozerov, R. Taleyarkhan\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4065852\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents results of neutron detection efficiency and dosimetry between a non-borated centrifugally tensioned metastable fluid detector (NB-CTMFD) configured to detect fast (>0.1 MeV) vs. He-3 based Ludlum-42-49B and the Fuji NSN3, detectors behind various levels of lead and concrete shieldin-together with MCNP code simulations to account for 3-D effects and to relate the detection sensitivity with the dose rate. The MCNP results for neutron energy spectra were validated vs. experimental measurements using the H*TMFD. While Ludlum and NSN3 operate at a fixed sensitivity, the NB-CTMFD detector offers variable sensitivity by varying the tensioned metastable negative pressure (Pneg) from 0.3 MPa to 0.7 MPa. The NB-CTMFD (configured for fast: > 0.2 MeV neutron detection) offered relative sensitivity enhancements of up to 15x greater than the Ludlum and ~5x greater than the NSN3 detector for low shielding thicknesses. For larger thicknesses, the advantage factor for NB-CTMFD unit reduces with increased fast neutron removal via down-scattering, which benefits the Ludlum and NSN3 detectors. Our companion paper compares performance with a Cf-252 spectrum using a borated CTMFD (covering dual energy bins: thermal-epithermal and fast energy ranges) wherein, it is demonstrated that the advantage factor for the CTMFD (if borated) remains elevated at the 5-10x higher level for low and large shielding thicknesses and soft and hard neutron spectra.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4065852\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4065852","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了为探测快中子(>0.1MeV)而配置的无硼离心张力可变流体探测器(NB-CTMFD)与基于He-3的Ludlum-42-49B和富士NSN3探测器之间的中子探测效率和剂量测定结果,以及MCNP代码模拟,以考虑三维效应并将探测灵敏度与剂量率联系起来。MCNP 的中子能谱结果与使用 H*TMFD 进行的实验测量结果进行了对比验证。Ludlum 和 NSN3 是在固定灵敏度下工作的,而 NB-CTMFD 探测器则可通过改变 0.3 兆帕至 0.7 兆帕的拉伸可变负压 (Pneg) 来提供可变灵敏度。NB-CTMFD(配置用于快速:> 0.2 MeV 中子探测)在屏蔽厚度较低时,相对灵敏度比 Ludlum 高 15 倍,比 NSN3 探测器高 ~5 倍。对于较大的屏蔽厚度,NB-CTMFD 单元的优势系数会随着通过向下散射去除快中子的增加而降低,这有利于 Ludlum 和 NSN3 探测器。我们的配套论文比较了使用硼化 CTMFD 的 Cf-252 光谱的性能(涵盖双能量区:热-外热能和快能范围),结果表明 CTMFD(如果硼化)的优势因子在低和大屏蔽厚度以及软中子和硬中子光谱中都保持在 5-10 倍的较高水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance of NB-CTMFD detector vs Ludlum 42-49B, and Fuji NSN3 detectors for hard (Am-Be) and soft (Cf-252 fission) energy spectra neutron sources within lead/concrete shielded configurations
This paper presents results of neutron detection efficiency and dosimetry between a non-borated centrifugally tensioned metastable fluid detector (NB-CTMFD) configured to detect fast (>0.1 MeV) vs. He-3 based Ludlum-42-49B and the Fuji NSN3, detectors behind various levels of lead and concrete shieldin-together with MCNP code simulations to account for 3-D effects and to relate the detection sensitivity with the dose rate. The MCNP results for neutron energy spectra were validated vs. experimental measurements using the H*TMFD. While Ludlum and NSN3 operate at a fixed sensitivity, the NB-CTMFD detector offers variable sensitivity by varying the tensioned metastable negative pressure (Pneg) from 0.3 MPa to 0.7 MPa. The NB-CTMFD (configured for fast: > 0.2 MeV neutron detection) offered relative sensitivity enhancements of up to 15x greater than the Ludlum and ~5x greater than the NSN3 detector for low shielding thicknesses. For larger thicknesses, the advantage factor for NB-CTMFD unit reduces with increased fast neutron removal via down-scattering, which benefits the Ludlum and NSN3 detectors. Our companion paper compares performance with a Cf-252 spectrum using a borated CTMFD (covering dual energy bins: thermal-epithermal and fast energy ranges) wherein, it is demonstrated that the advantage factor for the CTMFD (if borated) remains elevated at the 5-10x higher level for low and large shielding thicknesses and soft and hard neutron spectra.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science is ASME’s latest title within the energy sector. The publication is for specialists in the nuclear/power engineering areas of industry, academia, and government.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信