康德的认知理论与实践旨趣:论《康德全集》中表象与事物的区分

IF 0.1 N/A PHILOSOPHY
Aliki Lavranu
{"title":"康德的认知理论与实践旨趣:论《康德全集》中表象与事物的区分","authors":"Aliki Lavranu","doi":"10.53656/phil2024-02-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the significance of the distinction between phenomena and things in themselves for the foundation of Kantian practical reason. It holds that this distinction acquires its full meaning and the entire gamut of its validity only in the sphere of practical reason. In this way, it attempts to show that the Kantian epistemological distinctions and the fundamental steps in the construction of the Critique of Pure Reason are at the same time strategies to support practical reason, thus driven by an emphatically “practical interest”.","PeriodicalId":53786,"journal":{"name":"Filosofiya-Philosophy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theory of Cognition and Practical Interest in Kant: on the Distinction Between Appearance and Thing in Itslef\",\"authors\":\"Aliki Lavranu\",\"doi\":\"10.53656/phil2024-02-03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article examines the significance of the distinction between phenomena and things in themselves for the foundation of Kantian practical reason. It holds that this distinction acquires its full meaning and the entire gamut of its validity only in the sphere of practical reason. In this way, it attempts to show that the Kantian epistemological distinctions and the fundamental steps in the construction of the Critique of Pure Reason are at the same time strategies to support practical reason, thus driven by an emphatically “practical interest”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Filosofiya-Philosophy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Filosofiya-Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53656/phil2024-02-03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filosofiya-Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53656/phil2024-02-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文章探讨了现象与事物本身之间的区别对于康德实践理性基础的意义。文章认为,这种区分只有在实践理性领域才具有其全部意义和有效性。通过这种方式,它试图说明康德认识论的区分和构建《纯粹理性批判》的基本步骤同时也是支持实践理性的策略,因此是由一种强调的 "实践旨趣 "所驱动的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Theory of Cognition and Practical Interest in Kant: on the Distinction Between Appearance and Thing in Itslef
The article examines the significance of the distinction between phenomena and things in themselves for the foundation of Kantian practical reason. It holds that this distinction acquires its full meaning and the entire gamut of its validity only in the sphere of practical reason. In this way, it attempts to show that the Kantian epistemological distinctions and the fundamental steps in the construction of the Critique of Pure Reason are at the same time strategies to support practical reason, thus driven by an emphatically “practical interest”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Filosofiya-Philosophy
Filosofiya-Philosophy PHILOSOPHY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信