肺纤维化基金会患者登记中的吡非尼酮对特发性肺纤维化患者的患者报告结果的影响

Mohleen Kang MD, MS , Sachin Gupta MD , Yi-Hsuan Tu PhD , Karina Raimundo MS , Anisha M. Patel PhD , Kevin R. Flaherty MD
{"title":"肺纤维化基金会患者登记中的吡非尼酮对特发性肺纤维化患者的患者报告结果的影响","authors":"Mohleen Kang MD, MS ,&nbsp;Sachin Gupta MD ,&nbsp;Yi-Hsuan Tu PhD ,&nbsp;Karina Raimundo MS ,&nbsp;Anisha M. Patel PhD ,&nbsp;Kevin R. Flaherty MD","doi":"10.1016/j.chpulm.2024.100082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) experience debilitating symptoms. Although antifibrotics may slow lung function decline, their impact on patients’ health-related quality of life and disease symptoms in the real world remains unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><div>What is the impact of pirfenidone vs no treatment on health-related quality of life and IPF-related symptoms of cough, dyspnea, and fatigue?</div></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><div>This retrospective analysis included patients with IPF aged ≥ 55 years enrolled in the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry between March 2016 and December 2021. Change from baseline in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including the Leicester Cough Questionnaire, University of California, San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (UCSD SOBQ), Fatigue Severity Scale, and Short-Form 6-Dimension questionnaire were assessed at months 6, 12, and 18 in patients receiving pirfenidone vs no treatment. A marginal structure model accounted for time-varying confounding caused by FVC % predicted and diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide % predicted.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the Leicester Cough Questionnaire population (n = 237; pirfenidone, n = 155; no treatment, n = 82), treatment groups differed in age, insurance, and FVC % predicted. In the unadjusted analyses, mean changes in PROMs differed numerically between treatment groups; however, based on the marginal structure model, no significant differences were found in adjusted mean changes in PROMs. When analyzed by Gender, Age, and Physiology score, a clinically meaningful reduction in worsening of pirfenidone vs no treatment was observed in the adjusted mean change of UCSD SOBQ score at month 12 in patients with Gender, Age, and Physiology score stage 2/3.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Similar to previous findings, the difference in UCSD SOBQ scores observed in this real-world analysis suggests that patients with more advanced IPF may experience less dyspnea when receiving pirfenidone vs no treatment. Further research is needed to confirm this finding.</div></div><div><h3>Trial Registry</h3><div><span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>; No.: NCT02758808; URL: <span><span>www.clinicaltrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":94286,"journal":{"name":"CHEST pulmonary","volume":"2 4","pages":"Article 100082"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Pirfenidone on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis From the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry\",\"authors\":\"Mohleen Kang MD, MS ,&nbsp;Sachin Gupta MD ,&nbsp;Yi-Hsuan Tu PhD ,&nbsp;Karina Raimundo MS ,&nbsp;Anisha M. Patel PhD ,&nbsp;Kevin R. Flaherty MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chpulm.2024.100082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) experience debilitating symptoms. Although antifibrotics may slow lung function decline, their impact on patients’ health-related quality of life and disease symptoms in the real world remains unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><div>What is the impact of pirfenidone vs no treatment on health-related quality of life and IPF-related symptoms of cough, dyspnea, and fatigue?</div></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><div>This retrospective analysis included patients with IPF aged ≥ 55 years enrolled in the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry between March 2016 and December 2021. Change from baseline in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including the Leicester Cough Questionnaire, University of California, San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (UCSD SOBQ), Fatigue Severity Scale, and Short-Form 6-Dimension questionnaire were assessed at months 6, 12, and 18 in patients receiving pirfenidone vs no treatment. A marginal structure model accounted for time-varying confounding caused by FVC % predicted and diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide % predicted.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the Leicester Cough Questionnaire population (n = 237; pirfenidone, n = 155; no treatment, n = 82), treatment groups differed in age, insurance, and FVC % predicted. In the unadjusted analyses, mean changes in PROMs differed numerically between treatment groups; however, based on the marginal structure model, no significant differences were found in adjusted mean changes in PROMs. When analyzed by Gender, Age, and Physiology score, a clinically meaningful reduction in worsening of pirfenidone vs no treatment was observed in the adjusted mean change of UCSD SOBQ score at month 12 in patients with Gender, Age, and Physiology score stage 2/3.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Similar to previous findings, the difference in UCSD SOBQ scores observed in this real-world analysis suggests that patients with more advanced IPF may experience less dyspnea when receiving pirfenidone vs no treatment. Further research is needed to confirm this finding.</div></div><div><h3>Trial Registry</h3><div><span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>; No.: NCT02758808; URL: <span><span>www.clinicaltrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CHEST pulmonary\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100082\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CHEST pulmonary\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949789224000485\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHEST pulmonary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949789224000485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

特发性肺纤维化(IPF)患者会出现衰弱症状。虽然抗纤维化药物可能减缓肺功能下降,但其对患者健康相关生活质量和现实世界中疾病症状的影响尚不清楚。研究问题:吡非尼酮治疗与不治疗对健康相关生活质量和ipf相关症状(咳嗽、呼吸困难和疲劳)的影响是什么?研究设计和方法本回顾性分析纳入了2016年3月至2021年12月期间在肺纤维化基金会患者登记处登记的年龄≥55岁的IPF患者。在接受吡非尼酮治疗和未接受治疗的患者中,分别在第6、12和18个月评估患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)的基线变化,包括莱斯特咳嗽问卷、加州大学圣地亚哥分校呼吸急促问卷(UCSD SOBQ)、疲劳严重程度量表和短格式6维度问卷。一个边际结构模型解释了由预测的FVC %和预测的肺对一氧化碳的扩散能力引起的时变混淆。结果莱斯特咳嗽问卷调查人群(n = 237;吡非尼酮,n = 155;未治疗(n = 82),治疗组在年龄、保险和FVC %预测方面存在差异。在未经调整的分析中,各治疗组之间PROMs的平均变化有数值上的差异;然而,根据边际结构模型,调整后的PROMs平均变化没有显著差异。当通过性别、年龄和生理评分进行分析时,在性别、年龄和生理评分为2/3期的患者中,第12个月UCSD SOBQ评分的调整平均变化中观察到吡非尼酮与未治疗相比有临床意义的恶化减少。与之前的研究结果相似,在现实世界分析中观察到的UCSD SOBQ评分的差异表明,较晚期IPF患者在接受吡非尼酮治疗与未接受治疗时可能会出现更少的呼吸困难。需要进一步的研究来证实这一发现。审判RegistryClinicalTrials.gov;否。: NCT02758808;URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Pirfenidone on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis From the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry

Background

Patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) experience debilitating symptoms. Although antifibrotics may slow lung function decline, their impact on patients’ health-related quality of life and disease symptoms in the real world remains unknown.

Research Question

What is the impact of pirfenidone vs no treatment on health-related quality of life and IPF-related symptoms of cough, dyspnea, and fatigue?

Study Design and Methods

This retrospective analysis included patients with IPF aged ≥ 55 years enrolled in the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry between March 2016 and December 2021. Change from baseline in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including the Leicester Cough Questionnaire, University of California, San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (UCSD SOBQ), Fatigue Severity Scale, and Short-Form 6-Dimension questionnaire were assessed at months 6, 12, and 18 in patients receiving pirfenidone vs no treatment. A marginal structure model accounted for time-varying confounding caused by FVC % predicted and diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide % predicted.

Results

In the Leicester Cough Questionnaire population (n = 237; pirfenidone, n = 155; no treatment, n = 82), treatment groups differed in age, insurance, and FVC % predicted. In the unadjusted analyses, mean changes in PROMs differed numerically between treatment groups; however, based on the marginal structure model, no significant differences were found in adjusted mean changes in PROMs. When analyzed by Gender, Age, and Physiology score, a clinically meaningful reduction in worsening of pirfenidone vs no treatment was observed in the adjusted mean change of UCSD SOBQ score at month 12 in patients with Gender, Age, and Physiology score stage 2/3.

Interpretation

Similar to previous findings, the difference in UCSD SOBQ scores observed in this real-world analysis suggests that patients with more advanced IPF may experience less dyspnea when receiving pirfenidone vs no treatment. Further research is needed to confirm this finding.

Trial Registry

ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT02758808; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信