不同浓度纳米银和洗必泰对粪肠球菌抗菌效果的比较分析--体外研究

Pooja Warade, Manoj Likhitkar, Anant Kumar Heda, Deepali Birla, Thanima Chandran, N. Ingle
{"title":"不同浓度纳米银和洗必泰对粪肠球菌抗菌效果的比较分析--体外研究","authors":"Pooja Warade, Manoj Likhitkar, Anant Kumar Heda, Deepali Birla, Thanima Chandran, N. Ingle","doi":"10.4103/jorr.jorr_69_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Root canal irrigants combat endodontic microbial flora, effectively targeting resilient microbes like Enterococcus faecalis, which persist despite treatment. Chlorhexidine (CHX), as an irrigant, boasts broad-spectrum antibacterial activity, notable substantivity in dentine, and favorable biocompatibility. In the realm of nanotechnology, the use of silver nanoparticle (AgNP) solutions appears promising, given their strong antibacterial and antimicrobial properties.\n \n \n \n The objective of the study was to compare the antimicrobial effectiveness of varying concentrations (1%, 0.75%, and 0.5%) of AgNPs and 2% CHX against E. faecalis.\n \n \n \n Four irrigant solutions, including 1%, 0.75%, and 0.5% AgNPs and 2% CHX with gentamicin as the control, will be assessed. The ATCC 29212 strain of E. faecalis will be cultivated at 37°C on brain–heart infusion Broth plates. After 48 h, the bacterial population will be quantified by counting colony-forming units on agar plates. Each irrigant will be applied to the plates, and the resulting bacterial inhibition zone will be measured.\n \n \n \n Our study demonstrates the antimicrobial effects of 1%, 0.75%, and 0.5% AgNPs and 2% CHX against E. faecalis. While 2% CHX exhibited superior activity, AgNPs at various concentrations also displayed inhibitory effects against E. faecalis.\n \n \n \n In conclusion, this study highlights the antimicrobial properties of 1%, 0.75%, and 0.5% AgNPs and 2% CHX against E. faecalis. The results indicate that 2% CHX exhibits superior activity, while AgNPs at various concentrations also demonstrate inhibitory zones against E. faecalis.\n","PeriodicalId":31361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral Research and Review","volume":"14 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative analysis of the antimicrobial efficacy of different concentrations of silver nanoparticles and chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalis - In vitro study\",\"authors\":\"Pooja Warade, Manoj Likhitkar, Anant Kumar Heda, Deepali Birla, Thanima Chandran, N. Ingle\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jorr.jorr_69_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Root canal irrigants combat endodontic microbial flora, effectively targeting resilient microbes like Enterococcus faecalis, which persist despite treatment. Chlorhexidine (CHX), as an irrigant, boasts broad-spectrum antibacterial activity, notable substantivity in dentine, and favorable biocompatibility. In the realm of nanotechnology, the use of silver nanoparticle (AgNP) solutions appears promising, given their strong antibacterial and antimicrobial properties.\\n \\n \\n \\n The objective of the study was to compare the antimicrobial effectiveness of varying concentrations (1%, 0.75%, and 0.5%) of AgNPs and 2% CHX against E. faecalis.\\n \\n \\n \\n Four irrigant solutions, including 1%, 0.75%, and 0.5% AgNPs and 2% CHX with gentamicin as the control, will be assessed. The ATCC 29212 strain of E. faecalis will be cultivated at 37°C on brain–heart infusion Broth plates. After 48 h, the bacterial population will be quantified by counting colony-forming units on agar plates. Each irrigant will be applied to the plates, and the resulting bacterial inhibition zone will be measured.\\n \\n \\n \\n Our study demonstrates the antimicrobial effects of 1%, 0.75%, and 0.5% AgNPs and 2% CHX against E. faecalis. While 2% CHX exhibited superior activity, AgNPs at various concentrations also displayed inhibitory effects against E. faecalis.\\n \\n \\n \\n In conclusion, this study highlights the antimicrobial properties of 1%, 0.75%, and 0.5% AgNPs and 2% CHX against E. faecalis. The results indicate that 2% CHX exhibits superior activity, while AgNPs at various concentrations also demonstrate inhibitory zones against E. faecalis.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":31361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Oral Research and Review\",\"volume\":\"14 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Oral Research and Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jorr.jorr_69_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral Research and Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jorr.jorr_69_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根管冲洗剂可以抗击牙髓微生物菌群,有效针对粪肠球菌等顽固微生物,因为这些微生物在接受治疗后仍然存在。洗必泰(CHX)作为一种冲洗剂,具有广谱抗菌活性,在牙本质中具有显著的吸附性和良好的生物相容性。在纳米技术领域,银纳米粒子(AgNP)溶液具有很强的抗菌和抑菌特性,因此使用银纳米粒子溶液似乎很有前景。 本研究旨在比较不同浓度(1%、0.75% 和 0.5%)的 AgNPs 和 2% CHX 对粪肠球菌的抗菌效果。 本研究将评估四种冲洗溶液,包括 1%、0.75% 和 0.5% 的 AgNPs 和 2% CHX,并以庆大霉素作为对照。粪肠球菌的 ATCC 29212 菌株将在 37°C 下培养在脑心输液肉汤平板上。48 小时后,通过计数琼脂平板上的菌落形成单位来量化细菌数量。在平板上涂抹每种冲洗剂,并测量由此产生的细菌抑制区。 我们的研究证明了 1%、0.75%、0.5% AgNPs 和 2% CHX 对粪肠球菌的抗菌效果。虽然 2% CHX 表现出更高的活性,但不同浓度的 AgNPs 对粪大肠杆菌也有抑制作用。 总之,本研究强调了 1%、0.75%、0.5% AgNPs 和 2% CHX 对粪肠球菌的抗菌特性。结果表明,2% CHX 具有更强的活性,而不同浓度的 AgNPs 对粪大肠杆菌也有抑制作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative analysis of the antimicrobial efficacy of different concentrations of silver nanoparticles and chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalis - In vitro study
Root canal irrigants combat endodontic microbial flora, effectively targeting resilient microbes like Enterococcus faecalis, which persist despite treatment. Chlorhexidine (CHX), as an irrigant, boasts broad-spectrum antibacterial activity, notable substantivity in dentine, and favorable biocompatibility. In the realm of nanotechnology, the use of silver nanoparticle (AgNP) solutions appears promising, given their strong antibacterial and antimicrobial properties. The objective of the study was to compare the antimicrobial effectiveness of varying concentrations (1%, 0.75%, and 0.5%) of AgNPs and 2% CHX against E. faecalis. Four irrigant solutions, including 1%, 0.75%, and 0.5% AgNPs and 2% CHX with gentamicin as the control, will be assessed. The ATCC 29212 strain of E. faecalis will be cultivated at 37°C on brain–heart infusion Broth plates. After 48 h, the bacterial population will be quantified by counting colony-forming units on agar plates. Each irrigant will be applied to the plates, and the resulting bacterial inhibition zone will be measured. Our study demonstrates the antimicrobial effects of 1%, 0.75%, and 0.5% AgNPs and 2% CHX against E. faecalis. While 2% CHX exhibited superior activity, AgNPs at various concentrations also displayed inhibitory effects against E. faecalis. In conclusion, this study highlights the antimicrobial properties of 1%, 0.75%, and 0.5% AgNPs and 2% CHX against E. faecalis. The results indicate that 2% CHX exhibits superior activity, while AgNPs at various concentrations also demonstrate inhibitory zones against E. faecalis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信