2009-2017 年医疗保险优势计划参保者治疗乳腺癌的超分割放疗支出和使用情况

IF 2.2 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Loren Saulsberry PhD, Chuanhong Liao MS, Dezheng Huo MD, PhD
{"title":"2009-2017 年医疗保险优势计划参保者治疗乳腺癌的超分割放疗支出和使用情况","authors":"Loren Saulsberry PhD,&nbsp;Chuanhong Liao MS,&nbsp;Dezheng Huo MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Technology advances in cancer care have paralleled rapidly increasing expenditures in radiation therapy. The use and costs of shorter cancer radiation therapy offer potential utility in clinical practice. We evaluate use and expenditures of Medicare Advantage (MA) beneficiaries receiving hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (HF-WBI) compared with conventionally fractionated whole breast irradiation (CF-WBI) in the United States and examine the relationship of patient characteristics with HF-WBI use.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><p>We performed a retrospective analysis of radiation therapy in MA beneficiaries using private employer-sponsored insurance claims for a pooled cross-sectional evaluation from 2009 to 2017. The study population included female MA beneficiaries with early-stage breast cancer treated with lumpectomy and whole breast irradiation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 9957 women received HF-WBI, and 18,920 received CF-WBI. Older age, greater distance from home to treatment facility, and a higher proportion of college graduates in the community of residence were associated with increased HF-WBI use. Mean insurer-paid radiation therapy expenditures were significantly lower for HF-WBI versus CF-WBI (adjusted difference, $4113; 95% CI, $4030-$4,197). Mean patient out-of-pocket expenditure for HF-WBI was $426 less than that of CF-WBI. Across US states, geographic variation existed in the ratio of costs for HF-WBI relative to CF-WBI (range, 0.41-0.87).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>HF-WBI use among MA beneficiaries with breast cancer has dramatically increased over time, surpassing CF-HBI as the dominant form of radiation therapy. HF-WBI clinical adoption has outpaced any continual cost decrease, despite wide variation across US states for this shorter radiation therapy treatment. As MA enrollment continues to expand, identifying the drivers of HF-WBI use and the sources of variation in costs of HF-WBI will help direct the quality of cancer care delivered to Medicare beneficiaries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"9 9","pages":"Article 101568"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424001313/pdfft?md5=a6284526993467d7929d523cbef50b0b&pid=1-s2.0-S2452109424001313-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expenditures and Use of Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy Treating Breast Cancer Among Medicare Advantage Enrollees, 2009 to 2017\",\"authors\":\"Loren Saulsberry PhD,&nbsp;Chuanhong Liao MS,&nbsp;Dezheng Huo MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101568\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Technology advances in cancer care have paralleled rapidly increasing expenditures in radiation therapy. The use and costs of shorter cancer radiation therapy offer potential utility in clinical practice. We evaluate use and expenditures of Medicare Advantage (MA) beneficiaries receiving hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (HF-WBI) compared with conventionally fractionated whole breast irradiation (CF-WBI) in the United States and examine the relationship of patient characteristics with HF-WBI use.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><p>We performed a retrospective analysis of radiation therapy in MA beneficiaries using private employer-sponsored insurance claims for a pooled cross-sectional evaluation from 2009 to 2017. The study population included female MA beneficiaries with early-stage breast cancer treated with lumpectomy and whole breast irradiation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 9957 women received HF-WBI, and 18,920 received CF-WBI. Older age, greater distance from home to treatment facility, and a higher proportion of college graduates in the community of residence were associated with increased HF-WBI use. Mean insurer-paid radiation therapy expenditures were significantly lower for HF-WBI versus CF-WBI (adjusted difference, $4113; 95% CI, $4030-$4,197). Mean patient out-of-pocket expenditure for HF-WBI was $426 less than that of CF-WBI. Across US states, geographic variation existed in the ratio of costs for HF-WBI relative to CF-WBI (range, 0.41-0.87).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>HF-WBI use among MA beneficiaries with breast cancer has dramatically increased over time, surpassing CF-HBI as the dominant form of radiation therapy. HF-WBI clinical adoption has outpaced any continual cost decrease, despite wide variation across US states for this shorter radiation therapy treatment. As MA enrollment continues to expand, identifying the drivers of HF-WBI use and the sources of variation in costs of HF-WBI will help direct the quality of cancer care delivered to Medicare beneficiaries.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"9 9\",\"pages\":\"Article 101568\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424001313/pdfft?md5=a6284526993467d7929d523cbef50b0b&pid=1-s2.0-S2452109424001313-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424001313\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424001313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的随着癌症治疗技术的进步,放射治疗的支出也在迅速增加。短程癌症放射治疗的使用和成本为临床实践提供了潜在的实用性。我们评估了在美国接受低分次全乳腺照射(HF-WBI)与常规分次全乳腺照射(CF-WBI)的医疗保险优势(MA)受益人的使用情况和支出情况,并研究了患者特征与HF-WBI使用情况的关系。研究对象包括接受肿块切除术和全乳腺照射治疗的早期乳腺癌女性医疗保险受益人。结果共有9957名女性接受了高频-全乳腺照射,18920名女性接受了低频-全乳腺照射。年龄越大、从家到治疗机构的距离越远、居住社区的大学毕业生比例越高,都与使用高频放射治疗相关。HF-WBI与CF-WBI相比,保险人支付的平均放射治疗费用明显较低(调整后差异为4113美元;95% CI为4030-4197美元)。HF-WBI患者的平均自付费用比CF-WBI低426美元。在美国各州,HF-WBI 与 CF-WBI 的费用比率存在地域差异(范围为 0.41-0.87)。结论随着时间的推移,乳腺癌医保受益人中使用 HF-WBI 的人数急剧增加,已超过 CF-HBI 成为放疗的主要形式。尽管美国各州对这种较短的放射治疗方法的采用存在很大差异,但高频-WBI 的临床采用率超过了成本的持续下降。随着医疗保险参保人数的不断扩大,确定高频-腹腔穿刺使用的驱动因素和高频-腹腔穿刺成本差异的来源将有助于指导向医疗保险受益人提供癌症护理的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Expenditures and Use of Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy Treating Breast Cancer Among Medicare Advantage Enrollees, 2009 to 2017

Purpose

Technology advances in cancer care have paralleled rapidly increasing expenditures in radiation therapy. The use and costs of shorter cancer radiation therapy offer potential utility in clinical practice. We evaluate use and expenditures of Medicare Advantage (MA) beneficiaries receiving hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (HF-WBI) compared with conventionally fractionated whole breast irradiation (CF-WBI) in the United States and examine the relationship of patient characteristics with HF-WBI use.

Methods and Materials

We performed a retrospective analysis of radiation therapy in MA beneficiaries using private employer-sponsored insurance claims for a pooled cross-sectional evaluation from 2009 to 2017. The study population included female MA beneficiaries with early-stage breast cancer treated with lumpectomy and whole breast irradiation.

Results

A total of 9957 women received HF-WBI, and 18,920 received CF-WBI. Older age, greater distance from home to treatment facility, and a higher proportion of college graduates in the community of residence were associated with increased HF-WBI use. Mean insurer-paid radiation therapy expenditures were significantly lower for HF-WBI versus CF-WBI (adjusted difference, $4113; 95% CI, $4030-$4,197). Mean patient out-of-pocket expenditure for HF-WBI was $426 less than that of CF-WBI. Across US states, geographic variation existed in the ratio of costs for HF-WBI relative to CF-WBI (range, 0.41-0.87).

Conclusions

HF-WBI use among MA beneficiaries with breast cancer has dramatically increased over time, surpassing CF-HBI as the dominant form of radiation therapy. HF-WBI clinical adoption has outpaced any continual cost decrease, despite wide variation across US states for this shorter radiation therapy treatment. As MA enrollment continues to expand, identifying the drivers of HF-WBI use and the sources of variation in costs of HF-WBI will help direct the quality of cancer care delivered to Medicare beneficiaries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Radiation Oncology
Advances in Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
98 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of Advances is to provide information for clinicians who use radiation therapy by publishing: Clinical trial reports and reanalyses. Basic science original reports. Manuscripts examining health services research, comparative and cost effectiveness research, and systematic reviews. Case reports documenting unusual problems and solutions. High quality multi and single institutional series, as well as other novel retrospective hypothesis generating series. Timely critical reviews on important topics in radiation oncology, such as side effects. Articles reporting the natural history of disease and patterns of failure, particularly as they relate to treatment volume delineation. Articles on safety and quality in radiation therapy. Essays on clinical experience. Articles on practice transformation in radiation oncology, in particular: Aspects of health policy that may impact the future practice of radiation oncology. How information technology, such as data analytics and systems innovations, will change radiation oncology practice. Articles on imaging as they relate to radiation therapy treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信