开放考古学,开放源代码?新兴考古软件工程师社区的合作实践

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Zachary Batist, Joe Roe
{"title":"开放考古学,开放源代码?新兴考古软件工程师社区的合作实践","authors":"Zachary Batist, Joe Roe","doi":"10.11141/ia.67.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we investigate modes of collaboration in this emerging community of practice using 'open-archaeo ', a curated list of archaeological software, and data on the activity of associated GitHub repositories and users. We conduct an exploratory quantitative analysis to characterise the nature and intensity of these collaborations and map the collaborative networks that emerge from them. We document uneven adoption of open source collaborative practices beyond the basic use of git as a version control system and GitHub to host source code. Most projects do make use of collaborative features and, through shared contributions, we can trace a collaborative network that includes the majority of archaeologists active on GitHub. However, a majority of repositories have 1-3 contributors, with only a few projects distinguished by an active and diverse developer base. Direct collaboration on code or other repository content - as opposed to the more passive, social media-style interaction that GitHub supports – remains very limited. In other words, there is little evidence that archaeologists ' adoption of open-source tools (git and GitHub) has been accompanied by the decentralised, participatory forms of collaboration that characterise other open-source communities. On the contrary, our results indicate that research software engineering in archaeology remains largely embedded in conventional professional norms and organisational structures of academia.","PeriodicalId":38724,"journal":{"name":"Internet Archaeology","volume":"3 38","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open Archaeology, Open Source? Collaborative practices in an emerging community of archaeological software engineers\",\"authors\":\"Zachary Batist, Joe Roe\",\"doi\":\"10.11141/ia.67.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, we investigate modes of collaboration in this emerging community of practice using 'open-archaeo ', a curated list of archaeological software, and data on the activity of associated GitHub repositories and users. We conduct an exploratory quantitative analysis to characterise the nature and intensity of these collaborations and map the collaborative networks that emerge from them. We document uneven adoption of open source collaborative practices beyond the basic use of git as a version control system and GitHub to host source code. Most projects do make use of collaborative features and, through shared contributions, we can trace a collaborative network that includes the majority of archaeologists active on GitHub. However, a majority of repositories have 1-3 contributors, with only a few projects distinguished by an active and diverse developer base. Direct collaboration on code or other repository content - as opposed to the more passive, social media-style interaction that GitHub supports – remains very limited. In other words, there is little evidence that archaeologists ' adoption of open-source tools (git and GitHub) has been accompanied by the decentralised, participatory forms of collaboration that characterise other open-source communities. On the contrary, our results indicate that research software engineering in archaeology remains largely embedded in conventional professional norms and organisational structures of academia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internet Archaeology\",\"volume\":\"3 38\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internet Archaeology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.67.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.67.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中,我们利用 "open-archaeo"(一个考古软件的编辑列表)以及相关 GitHub 软件库和用户的活动数据,调查了这一新兴实践社区的合作模式。我们进行了探索性的定量分析,以描述这些合作的性质和强度,并绘制从中产生的合作网络。除了基本使用 git 作为版本控制系统和 GitHub 托管源代码之外,我们还记录了开源协作实践的不均衡采用情况。大多数项目确实使用了协作功能,通过共享贡献,我们可以追踪到一个协作网络,其中包括活跃在 GitHub 上的大多数考古学家。然而,大多数资源库只有 1-3 个贡献者,只有少数项目的开发者群体活跃且多样化。与 GitHub 所支持的更被动的社交媒体式互动相比,就代码或其他资源库内容进行的直接合作仍然非常有限。换句话说,几乎没有证据表明考古学家在采用开源工具(git 和 GitHub)的同时,也采用了其他开源社区所特有的分散式、参与式协作形式。相反,我们的研究结果表明,考古学中的研究软件工程在很大程度上仍然根植于传统的专业规范和学术界的组织结构之中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Open Archaeology, Open Source? Collaborative practices in an emerging community of archaeological software engineers
In this article, we investigate modes of collaboration in this emerging community of practice using 'open-archaeo ', a curated list of archaeological software, and data on the activity of associated GitHub repositories and users. We conduct an exploratory quantitative analysis to characterise the nature and intensity of these collaborations and map the collaborative networks that emerge from them. We document uneven adoption of open source collaborative practices beyond the basic use of git as a version control system and GitHub to host source code. Most projects do make use of collaborative features and, through shared contributions, we can trace a collaborative network that includes the majority of archaeologists active on GitHub. However, a majority of repositories have 1-3 contributors, with only a few projects distinguished by an active and diverse developer base. Direct collaboration on code or other repository content - as opposed to the more passive, social media-style interaction that GitHub supports – remains very limited. In other words, there is little evidence that archaeologists ' adoption of open-source tools (git and GitHub) has been accompanied by the decentralised, participatory forms of collaboration that characterise other open-source communities. On the contrary, our results indicate that research software engineering in archaeology remains largely embedded in conventional professional norms and organisational structures of academia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Internet Archaeology
Internet Archaeology Arts and Humanities-Archeology (arts and humanities)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信