地下建筑地震响应分析方法综述

Panpan Zhao
{"title":"地下建筑地震响应分析方法综述","authors":"Panpan Zhao","doi":"10.9734/air/2024/v25i41100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Seismic safety of underground structures is of paramount importance. This paper reviews the current research status of seismic response analysis methods for underground structures, focuses on the basic principles, advantages and disadvantages, and applicability of the proposed static method and dynamic time course analysis method. It also analyses their applications in engineering. It is shown that the seismic coefficient method, although simple, may have relatively large calculation errors due to oversimplification. The free-field deformation method is simple in form and easy to implement, but ignores soil-structure interaction. The flexibility coefficient method is simple in form and considers soil-structure interaction, but ignores many factors. The reaction displacement method directly reflects the soil-structure interaction, but the foundation spring parameters are difficult to value. The reaction acceleration method has the same advantages as the reaction displacement method, but there is a certain error. The dynamic time-course analysis method is accurate but computationally intensive.","PeriodicalId":91191,"journal":{"name":"Advances in research","volume":"5 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Review on Seismic Response Analysis Methods for Underground Structures\",\"authors\":\"Panpan Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/air/2024/v25i41100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Seismic safety of underground structures is of paramount importance. This paper reviews the current research status of seismic response analysis methods for underground structures, focuses on the basic principles, advantages and disadvantages, and applicability of the proposed static method and dynamic time course analysis method. It also analyses their applications in engineering. It is shown that the seismic coefficient method, although simple, may have relatively large calculation errors due to oversimplification. The free-field deformation method is simple in form and easy to implement, but ignores soil-structure interaction. The flexibility coefficient method is simple in form and considers soil-structure interaction, but ignores many factors. The reaction displacement method directly reflects the soil-structure interaction, but the foundation spring parameters are difficult to value. The reaction acceleration method has the same advantages as the reaction displacement method, but there is a certain error. The dynamic time-course analysis method is accurate but computationally intensive.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in research\",\"volume\":\"5 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/air/2024/v25i41100\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/air/2024/v25i41100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

地下结构的抗震安全至关重要。本文回顾了地下结构地震反应分析方法的研究现状,重点介绍了所提出的静态方法和动态时程分析方法的基本原理、优缺点和适用性。文章还分析了它们在工程中的应用。研究表明,地震系数法虽然简单,但由于过于简化,计算误差可能相对较大。自由场变形法形式简单,易于实施,但忽略了土壤与结构之间的相互作用。柔性系数法形式简单,考虑了土体与结构的相互作用,但忽略了许多因素。反作用位移法直接反映土-结构相互作用,但地基弹簧参数取值困难。反作用加速度法具有反作用位移法的优点,但存在一定误差。动力时程分析法准确,但计算量大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Review on Seismic Response Analysis Methods for Underground Structures
Seismic safety of underground structures is of paramount importance. This paper reviews the current research status of seismic response analysis methods for underground structures, focuses on the basic principles, advantages and disadvantages, and applicability of the proposed static method and dynamic time course analysis method. It also analyses their applications in engineering. It is shown that the seismic coefficient method, although simple, may have relatively large calculation errors due to oversimplification. The free-field deformation method is simple in form and easy to implement, but ignores soil-structure interaction. The flexibility coefficient method is simple in form and considers soil-structure interaction, but ignores many factors. The reaction displacement method directly reflects the soil-structure interaction, but the foundation spring parameters are difficult to value. The reaction acceleration method has the same advantages as the reaction displacement method, but there is a certain error. The dynamic time-course analysis method is accurate but computationally intensive.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信