泰国 Siriraj 医院术后认知功能障碍数据库验证研究

Q3 Medicine
Surapa Tornsatitkul, P. Suraarunsumrit, Laddawan Jensarikit, A. Siriussawakul, S. Niyomnaitham
{"title":"泰国 Siriraj 医院术后认知功能障碍数据库验证研究","authors":"Surapa Tornsatitkul, P. Suraarunsumrit, Laddawan Jensarikit, A. Siriussawakul, S. Niyomnaitham","doi":"10.33192/smj.v76i7.268007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction (POCD) is a complication that arises in the elderly. Because of the limited knowledge of POCD, researchers must handle a substantial amount of data to ensure the comprehensive collection of all relevant factors. To deal with this data, a validation study is a valuable method that aids in qualifying the data.\nMaterials and Methods: A validation exercise was performed for 40% of the data in the Siriraj POCD database (n=250) in 2020-2023. The validation covered 30 items, including demographic data, surgical and anesthetic factors. The validation study had two components: internal validation, which aimed to assess the completeness, uniformity, plausibility, and accuracy of the data in the database, and external validation, where the results were compared to external literature to confirm their correspondence.\nResults: The completeness was 99.2% for creatinine and 94.0% for hemoglobin, while others showed 100% completeness. The accuracy ranged from 73.6% to 99.6%, with a median of 97.4%. Most errors found were related to “body weight”, followed by “hemoglobin levels” and “Propofol targeted controlled infusion”, with accuracy rates of 73.6%, 84.0%, and 85.2%, respectively. In the external validation, the POCD incidence at 1 week from surgery in the literature review ranged from 8.9%–46.1% compared to 26.0% in our study.\nConclusion: The Siriraj POCD cohort study database was found to be reasonably valid. Therefore, this data can support high-quality research. Our recommendations for developing a good database include implementing a dedicated plan, employing trained staff, and using reliable data sources.","PeriodicalId":37270,"journal":{"name":"Siriraj Medical Journal","volume":"18 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation Study of the Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction Database in Siriraj Hospital, Thailand\",\"authors\":\"Surapa Tornsatitkul, P. Suraarunsumrit, Laddawan Jensarikit, A. Siriussawakul, S. Niyomnaitham\",\"doi\":\"10.33192/smj.v76i7.268007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction (POCD) is a complication that arises in the elderly. Because of the limited knowledge of POCD, researchers must handle a substantial amount of data to ensure the comprehensive collection of all relevant factors. To deal with this data, a validation study is a valuable method that aids in qualifying the data.\\nMaterials and Methods: A validation exercise was performed for 40% of the data in the Siriraj POCD database (n=250) in 2020-2023. The validation covered 30 items, including demographic data, surgical and anesthetic factors. The validation study had two components: internal validation, which aimed to assess the completeness, uniformity, plausibility, and accuracy of the data in the database, and external validation, where the results were compared to external literature to confirm their correspondence.\\nResults: The completeness was 99.2% for creatinine and 94.0% for hemoglobin, while others showed 100% completeness. The accuracy ranged from 73.6% to 99.6%, with a median of 97.4%. Most errors found were related to “body weight”, followed by “hemoglobin levels” and “Propofol targeted controlled infusion”, with accuracy rates of 73.6%, 84.0%, and 85.2%, respectively. In the external validation, the POCD incidence at 1 week from surgery in the literature review ranged from 8.9%–46.1% compared to 26.0% in our study.\\nConclusion: The Siriraj POCD cohort study database was found to be reasonably valid. Therefore, this data can support high-quality research. Our recommendations for developing a good database include implementing a dedicated plan, employing trained staff, and using reliable data sources.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Siriraj Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"18 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Siriraj Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33192/smj.v76i7.268007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Siriraj Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33192/smj.v76i7.268007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:术后认知功能障碍(POCD)是老年人的一种并发症。由于对 POCD 的了解有限,研究人员必须处理大量数据,以确保全面收集所有相关因素。为了处理这些数据,验证研究是一种有价值的方法,有助于对数据进行定性:2020-2023 年,对锡里拉杰 POCD 数据库中 40% 的数据(n=250)进行了验证。验证涉及 30 个项目,包括人口统计学数据、手术和麻醉因素。验证研究包括两个部分:内部验证,旨在评估数据库中数据的完整性、统一性、可信度和准确性;外部验证,将验证结果与外部文献进行比较,以确认其对应性:肌酐和血红蛋白数据的完整性分别为 99.2%和 94.0%,其他数据的完整性为 100%。准确率从 73.6% 到 99.6% 不等,中位数为 97.4%。发现的大多数错误与 "体重 "有关,其次是 "血红蛋白水平 "和 "丙泊酚靶向控制输注",准确率分别为 73.6%、84.0% 和 85.2%。在外部验证中,文献综述中手术后 1 周的 POCD 发生率为 8.9%-46.1%,而我们的研究为 26.0%:西里拉吉 POCD 队列研究数据库具有合理的有效性。因此,这些数据可以为高质量的研究提供支持。我们对建立良好数据库的建议包括实施专门计划、聘用训练有素的员工和使用可靠的数据源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation Study of the Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction Database in Siriraj Hospital, Thailand
Objective: Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction (POCD) is a complication that arises in the elderly. Because of the limited knowledge of POCD, researchers must handle a substantial amount of data to ensure the comprehensive collection of all relevant factors. To deal with this data, a validation study is a valuable method that aids in qualifying the data. Materials and Methods: A validation exercise was performed for 40% of the data in the Siriraj POCD database (n=250) in 2020-2023. The validation covered 30 items, including demographic data, surgical and anesthetic factors. The validation study had two components: internal validation, which aimed to assess the completeness, uniformity, plausibility, and accuracy of the data in the database, and external validation, where the results were compared to external literature to confirm their correspondence. Results: The completeness was 99.2% for creatinine and 94.0% for hemoglobin, while others showed 100% completeness. The accuracy ranged from 73.6% to 99.6%, with a median of 97.4%. Most errors found were related to “body weight”, followed by “hemoglobin levels” and “Propofol targeted controlled infusion”, with accuracy rates of 73.6%, 84.0%, and 85.2%, respectively. In the external validation, the POCD incidence at 1 week from surgery in the literature review ranged from 8.9%–46.1% compared to 26.0% in our study. Conclusion: The Siriraj POCD cohort study database was found to be reasonably valid. Therefore, this data can support high-quality research. Our recommendations for developing a good database include implementing a dedicated plan, employing trained staff, and using reliable data sources.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Siriraj Medical Journal
Siriraj Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信