沙特阿拉伯有工作与无工作母亲的母乳喂养率:地区横断面研究

IF 0.2 Q4 PEDIATRICS
F. Almalki, Jana Abdulnaser Algithmi, Haitham Mohammed Alghamdi, Malek Adeeb Alhnaidi, Hammam Kandil
{"title":"沙特阿拉伯有工作与无工作母亲的母乳喂养率:地区横断面研究","authors":"F. Almalki, Jana Abdulnaser Algithmi, Haitham Mohammed Alghamdi, Malek Adeeb Alhnaidi, Hammam Kandil","doi":"10.4103/jcn.jcn_30_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Breastfeeding practices in Saudi Arabia may vary between working and non-working mothers. Working hours and work-related responsibilities may be obstacles to exclusive breastfeeding (EBF).\n \n \n \n This study aims to investigate the prevalence of breastfeeding among working versus non-working mothers in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia and to investigate barriers to EBF among working mothers.\n \n \n \n This was a cross-sectional survey-based study, in which 507 women were surveyed, predominantly aged 26–33 years. The data were collected through an online self-administered questionnaire sent randomly through social media. The Chi-squared test was employed to assess the prevalence and the factors influencing the choice of breastfeeding methods in these groups.\n \n \n \n EBF rate was 82% and 85.5% in non-working and working mothers, respectively. Exclusively breastfeeding mothers favored direct breastfeeding (54%) and mostly breastfed for over 6 months of their infants’ age (92%), whereas non-EBF mothers favored a combination of milk pumps and direct breastfeeding (P ≤ 0.001). The majority of working mothers strongly agree with the continuation of breastfeeding for the first 6 months of the child’s life if the workplace provides special breastfeeding facilities, provides paid maternity leave, or if they get help with housework.\n \n \n \n There was no difference in the duration of breastfeeding in working mothers compared to nonworking mothers. Working mothers report many barriers to breastfeeding, and those strategies should be targeted by governmental programs to enhance EBF practices.\n","PeriodicalId":45332,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neonatology","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of Breastfeeding among Working versus Nonworking Mothers in Saudi Arabia: A Regional Cross-sectional Study\",\"authors\":\"F. Almalki, Jana Abdulnaser Algithmi, Haitham Mohammed Alghamdi, Malek Adeeb Alhnaidi, Hammam Kandil\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jcn.jcn_30_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Breastfeeding practices in Saudi Arabia may vary between working and non-working mothers. Working hours and work-related responsibilities may be obstacles to exclusive breastfeeding (EBF).\\n \\n \\n \\n This study aims to investigate the prevalence of breastfeeding among working versus non-working mothers in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia and to investigate barriers to EBF among working mothers.\\n \\n \\n \\n This was a cross-sectional survey-based study, in which 507 women were surveyed, predominantly aged 26–33 years. The data were collected through an online self-administered questionnaire sent randomly through social media. The Chi-squared test was employed to assess the prevalence and the factors influencing the choice of breastfeeding methods in these groups.\\n \\n \\n \\n EBF rate was 82% and 85.5% in non-working and working mothers, respectively. Exclusively breastfeeding mothers favored direct breastfeeding (54%) and mostly breastfed for over 6 months of their infants’ age (92%), whereas non-EBF mothers favored a combination of milk pumps and direct breastfeeding (P ≤ 0.001). The majority of working mothers strongly agree with the continuation of breastfeeding for the first 6 months of the child’s life if the workplace provides special breastfeeding facilities, provides paid maternity leave, or if they get help with housework.\\n \\n \\n \\n There was no difference in the duration of breastfeeding in working mothers compared to nonworking mothers. Working mothers report many barriers to breastfeeding, and those strategies should be targeted by governmental programs to enhance EBF practices.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":45332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Neonatology\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Neonatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcn.jcn_30_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcn.jcn_30_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在沙特阿拉伯,有工作和没有工作的母亲的母乳喂养方式可能有所不同。工作时间和与工作相关的责任可能会成为纯母乳喂养(EBF)的障碍。 本研究旨在调查沙特阿拉伯吉达市在职与非在职母亲的母乳喂养率,并调查在职母亲进行纯母乳喂养的障碍。 这是一项以横断面调查为基础的研究,共调查了 507 名妇女,她们的年龄主要在 26-33 岁之间。数据是通过社交媒体随机发送的在线自填问卷收集的。研究采用了 "卡方检验"(Chi-squared test)来评估这些群体选择母乳喂养方法的普遍程度和影响因素。 非在职母亲和在职母亲的母乳喂养率分别为 82% 和 85.5%。纯母乳喂养的母亲更倾向于直接母乳喂养(54%),且大多在婴儿6个月以上时进行母乳喂养(92%),而非母乳喂养的母亲则倾向于吸奶器和直接母乳喂养相结合(P ≤ 0.001)。如果工作单位提供专门的母乳喂养设施、带薪产假或帮助她们做家务,大多数职业母亲非常赞同在婴儿出生后的前 6 个月继续母乳喂养。 与非职业母亲相比,职业母亲的母乳喂养持续时间没有差异。有工作的母亲在母乳喂养方面遇到了许多障碍,政府计划应针对这些障碍采取相应的策略,以加强母乳喂养的实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevalence of Breastfeeding among Working versus Nonworking Mothers in Saudi Arabia: A Regional Cross-sectional Study
Breastfeeding practices in Saudi Arabia may vary between working and non-working mothers. Working hours and work-related responsibilities may be obstacles to exclusive breastfeeding (EBF). This study aims to investigate the prevalence of breastfeeding among working versus non-working mothers in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia and to investigate barriers to EBF among working mothers. This was a cross-sectional survey-based study, in which 507 women were surveyed, predominantly aged 26–33 years. The data were collected through an online self-administered questionnaire sent randomly through social media. The Chi-squared test was employed to assess the prevalence and the factors influencing the choice of breastfeeding methods in these groups. EBF rate was 82% and 85.5% in non-working and working mothers, respectively. Exclusively breastfeeding mothers favored direct breastfeeding (54%) and mostly breastfed for over 6 months of their infants’ age (92%), whereas non-EBF mothers favored a combination of milk pumps and direct breastfeeding (P ≤ 0.001). The majority of working mothers strongly agree with the continuation of breastfeeding for the first 6 months of the child’s life if the workplace provides special breastfeeding facilities, provides paid maternity leave, or if they get help with housework. There was no difference in the duration of breastfeeding in working mothers compared to nonworking mothers. Working mothers report many barriers to breastfeeding, and those strategies should be targeted by governmental programs to enhance EBF practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The JCN publishes original articles, clinical reviews and research reports which encompass both basic science and clinical research including randomized trials, observational studies and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信