前瞻性随机试验:比较两种用于乳腺放疗中深吸气憋气管理的装置:BRAVEHeart 试验结果

IF 2.2 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Hilary L. Byrne PhD , Elisabeth Steiner PhD , Jeremy Booth PhD , Gillian Lamoury BMed , Marita Morgia MBBS , Susan Carroll MBBS , Kylie Richardson , Leigh Ambrose MARTP , Kuldeep Makhija , Cameron Stanton MSc , Benjamin Zwan PhD , Michael Carr MSc , Maegan Stewart PhD , Regina Bromley MSc , John Atyeo PhD , Shona Silvester MMedSc , Natalie Plant MHSc , Paul Keall PhD
{"title":"前瞻性随机试验:比较两种用于乳腺放疗中深吸气憋气管理的装置:BRAVEHeart 试验结果","authors":"Hilary L. Byrne PhD ,&nbsp;Elisabeth Steiner PhD ,&nbsp;Jeremy Booth PhD ,&nbsp;Gillian Lamoury BMed ,&nbsp;Marita Morgia MBBS ,&nbsp;Susan Carroll MBBS ,&nbsp;Kylie Richardson ,&nbsp;Leigh Ambrose MARTP ,&nbsp;Kuldeep Makhija ,&nbsp;Cameron Stanton MSc ,&nbsp;Benjamin Zwan PhD ,&nbsp;Michael Carr MSc ,&nbsp;Maegan Stewart PhD ,&nbsp;Regina Bromley MSc ,&nbsp;John Atyeo PhD ,&nbsp;Shona Silvester MMedSc ,&nbsp;Natalie Plant MHSc ,&nbsp;Paul Keall PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The Breast Radiotherapy Audio Visual Enhancement for sparing the Heart (BRAVEHeart) trial prospectively randomized patients with left-sided breast cancer to 1 of 2 deep inspiration breath hold biofeedback devices: a novel chest surface tracking system and an abdominal block tracking system. The primary hypothesis was that the accuracy of chest tracking would be higher than that of abdominal tracking as the chest is a more direct surrogate of the breast target.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><p>Patients with left-sided breast cancer were treated in deep inspiration breath hold with intensity modulated radiation therapy delivery. Patients were randomized to either the novel chest surface system or abdominal block system for active management of breath hold with visual feedback. On both trial arms, the unallocated system was monitored passively. A total of 239,296 cine electronic portal imaging device images were analyzed retrospectively to extract the chest wall position. Treatment accuracy was quantified as the deviation of the internal chest wall during treatment relative to the planned position from the digitally reconstructed radiograph. The correlation between motion of the external surrogate and internal chest wall was calculated per-breath hold. Ease of use was assessed with questionnaires for both radiation therapists and patients and appointment length recorded.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Data from 26 participants were available for analysis. No difference was found in delivered treatment accuracy between arms. Across all patients and fractions, the median correlation between internal chest wall movement and external surrogate was 0.69 for the chest surface and 0.17 for the abdominal block. Patients found it easy to follow visual feedback from both systems. No difference was found in appointment length between arms.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>No statistical evidence was found for superior treatment accuracy, satisfaction, or appointment length for the novel chest surface tracking device compared with the abdominal block system. During deep inspiration breath hold, the median per-breath hold correlation of internal chest wall movement to the motion of the chest surface was higher than the median correlation of the abdominal block to the chest surface.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"9 9","pages":"Article 101572"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424001350/pdfft?md5=19ca82eaa5d654d9d1e8467002b6d58d&pid=1-s2.0-S2452109424001350-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing 2 Devices for Deep Inspiration Breath Hold Management in Breast Radiation Therapy: Results of the BRAVEHeart Trial\",\"authors\":\"Hilary L. Byrne PhD ,&nbsp;Elisabeth Steiner PhD ,&nbsp;Jeremy Booth PhD ,&nbsp;Gillian Lamoury BMed ,&nbsp;Marita Morgia MBBS ,&nbsp;Susan Carroll MBBS ,&nbsp;Kylie Richardson ,&nbsp;Leigh Ambrose MARTP ,&nbsp;Kuldeep Makhija ,&nbsp;Cameron Stanton MSc ,&nbsp;Benjamin Zwan PhD ,&nbsp;Michael Carr MSc ,&nbsp;Maegan Stewart PhD ,&nbsp;Regina Bromley MSc ,&nbsp;John Atyeo PhD ,&nbsp;Shona Silvester MMedSc ,&nbsp;Natalie Plant MHSc ,&nbsp;Paul Keall PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101572\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The Breast Radiotherapy Audio Visual Enhancement for sparing the Heart (BRAVEHeart) trial prospectively randomized patients with left-sided breast cancer to 1 of 2 deep inspiration breath hold biofeedback devices: a novel chest surface tracking system and an abdominal block tracking system. The primary hypothesis was that the accuracy of chest tracking would be higher than that of abdominal tracking as the chest is a more direct surrogate of the breast target.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><p>Patients with left-sided breast cancer were treated in deep inspiration breath hold with intensity modulated radiation therapy delivery. Patients were randomized to either the novel chest surface system or abdominal block system for active management of breath hold with visual feedback. On both trial arms, the unallocated system was monitored passively. A total of 239,296 cine electronic portal imaging device images were analyzed retrospectively to extract the chest wall position. Treatment accuracy was quantified as the deviation of the internal chest wall during treatment relative to the planned position from the digitally reconstructed radiograph. The correlation between motion of the external surrogate and internal chest wall was calculated per-breath hold. Ease of use was assessed with questionnaires for both radiation therapists and patients and appointment length recorded.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Data from 26 participants were available for analysis. No difference was found in delivered treatment accuracy between arms. Across all patients and fractions, the median correlation between internal chest wall movement and external surrogate was 0.69 for the chest surface and 0.17 for the abdominal block. Patients found it easy to follow visual feedback from both systems. No difference was found in appointment length between arms.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>No statistical evidence was found for superior treatment accuracy, satisfaction, or appointment length for the novel chest surface tracking device compared with the abdominal block system. During deep inspiration breath hold, the median per-breath hold correlation of internal chest wall movement to the motion of the chest surface was higher than the median correlation of the abdominal block to the chest surface.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"9 9\",\"pages\":\"Article 101572\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424001350/pdfft?md5=19ca82eaa5d654d9d1e8467002b6d58d&pid=1-s2.0-S2452109424001350-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424001350\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424001350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的乳腺放疗视听增强疏通心脏(BRAVEHeart)试验对左侧乳腺癌患者进行了前瞻性随机分组,从两种深吸气屏气生物反馈装置中选择一种:新型胸部表面跟踪系统和腹部阻滞跟踪系统。主要假设是,胸部跟踪的准确性将高于腹部跟踪的准确性,因为胸部是乳腺靶点更直接的替代物。患者被随机分配到新型胸部表面系统或腹部阻滞系统,通过视觉反馈对屏气进行主动管理。在这两种试验中,未分配的系统均为被动监测。对总共 239,296 张电影电子门成像设备图像进行了回顾性分析,以提取胸壁位置。治疗的准确性被量化为治疗过程中胸壁内部相对于数字重建放射影像计划位置的偏差。外部代理和内部胸壁运动之间的相关性是按每次呼吸计算的。通过对放射治疗人员和患者进行问卷调查来评估使用的简便性,并记录预约时间。结果发现,两组放射治疗的准确性没有差异。在所有患者和分次治疗中,胸壁内部移动与外部替代物之间的中位相关性为:胸部表面 0.69,腹部阻滞 0.17。患者认为两种系统的视觉反馈都很容易理解。结论与腹部阻滞系统相比,新型胸廓表面追踪装置在治疗准确性、满意度或预约时间方面均无明显差异。在深吸气屏气期间,每次屏气时胸壁内部运动与胸腔表面运动的中位相关性高于腹部阻滞与胸腔表面的中位相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing 2 Devices for Deep Inspiration Breath Hold Management in Breast Radiation Therapy: Results of the BRAVEHeart Trial

Purpose

The Breast Radiotherapy Audio Visual Enhancement for sparing the Heart (BRAVEHeart) trial prospectively randomized patients with left-sided breast cancer to 1 of 2 deep inspiration breath hold biofeedback devices: a novel chest surface tracking system and an abdominal block tracking system. The primary hypothesis was that the accuracy of chest tracking would be higher than that of abdominal tracking as the chest is a more direct surrogate of the breast target.

Methods and Materials

Patients with left-sided breast cancer were treated in deep inspiration breath hold with intensity modulated radiation therapy delivery. Patients were randomized to either the novel chest surface system or abdominal block system for active management of breath hold with visual feedback. On both trial arms, the unallocated system was monitored passively. A total of 239,296 cine electronic portal imaging device images were analyzed retrospectively to extract the chest wall position. Treatment accuracy was quantified as the deviation of the internal chest wall during treatment relative to the planned position from the digitally reconstructed radiograph. The correlation between motion of the external surrogate and internal chest wall was calculated per-breath hold. Ease of use was assessed with questionnaires for both radiation therapists and patients and appointment length recorded.

Results

Data from 26 participants were available for analysis. No difference was found in delivered treatment accuracy between arms. Across all patients and fractions, the median correlation between internal chest wall movement and external surrogate was 0.69 for the chest surface and 0.17 for the abdominal block. Patients found it easy to follow visual feedback from both systems. No difference was found in appointment length between arms.

Conclusions

No statistical evidence was found for superior treatment accuracy, satisfaction, or appointment length for the novel chest surface tracking device compared with the abdominal block system. During deep inspiration breath hold, the median per-breath hold correlation of internal chest wall movement to the motion of the chest surface was higher than the median correlation of the abdominal block to the chest surface.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Radiation Oncology
Advances in Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
98 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of Advances is to provide information for clinicians who use radiation therapy by publishing: Clinical trial reports and reanalyses. Basic science original reports. Manuscripts examining health services research, comparative and cost effectiveness research, and systematic reviews. Case reports documenting unusual problems and solutions. High quality multi and single institutional series, as well as other novel retrospective hypothesis generating series. Timely critical reviews on important topics in radiation oncology, such as side effects. Articles reporting the natural history of disease and patterns of failure, particularly as they relate to treatment volume delineation. Articles on safety and quality in radiation therapy. Essays on clinical experience. Articles on practice transformation in radiation oncology, in particular: Aspects of health policy that may impact the future practice of radiation oncology. How information technology, such as data analytics and systems innovations, will change radiation oncology practice. Articles on imaging as they relate to radiation therapy treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信