Laiyla Shinwari, Basirat Bukhari, Sarwat Irfan, R. Faisal
{"title":"巴基斯坦一家妇产医院初产妇和多产妇剖腹产率和适应症的比较。","authors":"Laiyla Shinwari, Basirat Bukhari, Sarwat Irfan, R. Faisal","doi":"10.29309/tpmj/2024.31.07.7653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the causes and rate of caesarean section in primigravida and multigravida. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Government Maternity Hospital, Peshawar. Period: January 2021 to January 2022. Methods: The study included all primigravida with 37-42 weeks period of gestation, and multigravida (gravida 2-12) with the same gestational period. Similarly, all the multigravida who delivered previously by C-section or had normal vaginal delivery with the viable fetus and currently delivered by C-section, were also included. Cases having history of ruptured uterus, nonviable pregnancy and ectopic pregnancy were excluded from the study. Results: Overall, the frequency of C-sections in the present study was 30% in primigravida and 70% in multigravida. Majority of the patients (65%) went through elective C-sections while 35% delivered through emergency C-sections, difference between the two is statistically significant (p-value <0.0001). The commonest cause for performing elective C-sections was previous C-sections. Fetal distress was the commonest indication 27.27% for emergency C-sections. Most of the C-sections performed in primigravida were because of fetal distress 23.3% while previous C-sections were the topmost cause in multigravida. Maternal wish is another new indication that accounted for 7.6% of C-sections. Conclusion: The results showed that the incidence of C-sections was higher in multigravida than primigravida. Similarly, the rate of elective C-sections was more than emergency ones. Maternal wish is another rising new indication for C-sections.","PeriodicalId":22991,"journal":{"name":"The professional medical journal","volume":"173 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the rate and indications of caesarean section in primigravida and multigravida in a maternity hospital of Pakistan.q\",\"authors\":\"Laiyla Shinwari, Basirat Bukhari, Sarwat Irfan, R. Faisal\",\"doi\":\"10.29309/tpmj/2024.31.07.7653\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To compare the causes and rate of caesarean section in primigravida and multigravida. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Government Maternity Hospital, Peshawar. Period: January 2021 to January 2022. Methods: The study included all primigravida with 37-42 weeks period of gestation, and multigravida (gravida 2-12) with the same gestational period. Similarly, all the multigravida who delivered previously by C-section or had normal vaginal delivery with the viable fetus and currently delivered by C-section, were also included. Cases having history of ruptured uterus, nonviable pregnancy and ectopic pregnancy were excluded from the study. Results: Overall, the frequency of C-sections in the present study was 30% in primigravida and 70% in multigravida. Majority of the patients (65%) went through elective C-sections while 35% delivered through emergency C-sections, difference between the two is statistically significant (p-value <0.0001). The commonest cause for performing elective C-sections was previous C-sections. Fetal distress was the commonest indication 27.27% for emergency C-sections. Most of the C-sections performed in primigravida were because of fetal distress 23.3% while previous C-sections were the topmost cause in multigravida. Maternal wish is another new indication that accounted for 7.6% of C-sections. Conclusion: The results showed that the incidence of C-sections was higher in multigravida than primigravida. Similarly, the rate of elective C-sections was more than emergency ones. Maternal wish is another rising new indication for C-sections.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The professional medical journal\",\"volume\":\"173 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The professional medical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29309/tpmj/2024.31.07.7653\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The professional medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29309/tpmj/2024.31.07.7653","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of the rate and indications of caesarean section in primigravida and multigravida in a maternity hospital of Pakistan.q
Objective: To compare the causes and rate of caesarean section in primigravida and multigravida. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Government Maternity Hospital, Peshawar. Period: January 2021 to January 2022. Methods: The study included all primigravida with 37-42 weeks period of gestation, and multigravida (gravida 2-12) with the same gestational period. Similarly, all the multigravida who delivered previously by C-section or had normal vaginal delivery with the viable fetus and currently delivered by C-section, were also included. Cases having history of ruptured uterus, nonviable pregnancy and ectopic pregnancy were excluded from the study. Results: Overall, the frequency of C-sections in the present study was 30% in primigravida and 70% in multigravida. Majority of the patients (65%) went through elective C-sections while 35% delivered through emergency C-sections, difference between the two is statistically significant (p-value <0.0001). The commonest cause for performing elective C-sections was previous C-sections. Fetal distress was the commonest indication 27.27% for emergency C-sections. Most of the C-sections performed in primigravida were because of fetal distress 23.3% while previous C-sections were the topmost cause in multigravida. Maternal wish is another new indication that accounted for 7.6% of C-sections. Conclusion: The results showed that the incidence of C-sections was higher in multigravida than primigravida. Similarly, the rate of elective C-sections was more than emergency ones. Maternal wish is another rising new indication for C-sections.