保乳治疗中局部广泛切除术或一级肿瘤整形技术的术前三维外观模拟不会对美学效果产生不切实际的期望:随机对照试验的一年随访。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
{"title":"保乳治疗中局部广泛切除术或一级肿瘤整形技术的术前三维外观模拟不会对美学效果产生不切实际的期望:随机对照试验的一年随访。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.07.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Simulation of aesthetic outcomes of wide local excision and level one oncoplastic breast conserving treatment (BCT) using 3-dimensional surface imaging (3D-SI) prepares women for their aesthetic outcome. It remains unknown whether women’s memory of this information at the one-year follow-up matches their perception of reality or affects the quality of life.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>With ethical approval, a prospective 3-arm RCT was conducted and it included 3D-simulation, viewing post-operative 2D photographs of other women and standard care. At one-year post-surgery, the participants completed a visual analogue scale (VAS) for the question “How well do you think the information about how your breasts are likely to look after surgery reflects how they actually look today?” and the BCT BREAST-Q module. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used to examine between-group differences at a 5% significance level.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From 2017 to 2019, 117 women completed the primary endpoint of being informed about the aesthetic outcome via verbal description, photographs or simulation. Seventy-eight (74%) of the 106 women who remained eligible attended the one-year follow-up. The standardised preoperative 3D-SI simulation did not affect the patient’s perception of the aesthetic outcome compared to standard care or viewing 2D photographs as measured using the VAS (<em>p</em> = 0.40) or BREAST-Q scores for satisfaction with information (<em>p</em> = 0.76), satisfaction with breasts (<em>p</em> = 0.70), and psychosocial wellbeing domains (<em>p</em> = 0.81).</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Viewing their own 3D-SI standardised simulation did not significantly affect how the participants perceived their aesthetic outcome. In addition, it did not alter the patient-reported satisfaction. These results demonstrated that simulation for wide local excision or level one oncoplastic surgery does not set unrealistic expectations of the aesthetic outcome when used in a preoperative setting.</p></div><div><h3>Synopsis</h3><p>The use of a non-bespoke three-dimensional simulation of the aesthetic outcome for breast conserving treatment in the preoperative setting does not over-inflate expectations compared to standard care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681524004005/pdfft?md5=f1f2c94c32a66adf45c7ea11da8f8eee&pid=1-s2.0-S1748681524004005-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preoperative three-dimensional simulation of the breast appearance after wide local excision or level one oncoplastic techniques for breast-conserving treatment does not set unrealistic expectations for aesthetic outcome: One-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.07.027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Simulation of aesthetic outcomes of wide local excision and level one oncoplastic breast conserving treatment (BCT) using 3-dimensional surface imaging (3D-SI) prepares women for their aesthetic outcome. It remains unknown whether women’s memory of this information at the one-year follow-up matches their perception of reality or affects the quality of life.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>With ethical approval, a prospective 3-arm RCT was conducted and it included 3D-simulation, viewing post-operative 2D photographs of other women and standard care. At one-year post-surgery, the participants completed a visual analogue scale (VAS) for the question “How well do you think the information about how your breasts are likely to look after surgery reflects how they actually look today?” and the BCT BREAST-Q module. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used to examine between-group differences at a 5% significance level.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From 2017 to 2019, 117 women completed the primary endpoint of being informed about the aesthetic outcome via verbal description, photographs or simulation. Seventy-eight (74%) of the 106 women who remained eligible attended the one-year follow-up. The standardised preoperative 3D-SI simulation did not affect the patient’s perception of the aesthetic outcome compared to standard care or viewing 2D photographs as measured using the VAS (<em>p</em> = 0.40) or BREAST-Q scores for satisfaction with information (<em>p</em> = 0.76), satisfaction with breasts (<em>p</em> = 0.70), and psychosocial wellbeing domains (<em>p</em> = 0.81).</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Viewing their own 3D-SI standardised simulation did not significantly affect how the participants perceived their aesthetic outcome. In addition, it did not alter the patient-reported satisfaction. These results demonstrated that simulation for wide local excision or level one oncoplastic surgery does not set unrealistic expectations of the aesthetic outcome when used in a preoperative setting.</p></div><div><h3>Synopsis</h3><p>The use of a non-bespoke three-dimensional simulation of the aesthetic outcome for breast conserving treatment in the preoperative setting does not over-inflate expectations compared to standard care.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681524004005/pdfft?md5=f1f2c94c32a66adf45c7ea11da8f8eee&pid=1-s2.0-S1748681524004005-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681524004005\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681524004005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:利用三维表面成像(3D-SI)模拟广泛局部切除术和一级肿瘤整形保乳治疗(BCT)的美学效果,让女性为其美学效果做好准备。在获得伦理批准后,我们进行了一项前瞻性三臂 RCT 研究,其中包括三维模拟、观看其他女性的术后二维照片和标准护理。术后一年时,受试者就 "您认为术后乳房外观的信息对其实际外观的反映程度如何?"这一问题完成了视觉模拟量表(VAS)和 BCT BREAST-Q 模块。结果从2017年到2019年,117名女性完成了主要终点,即通过口头描述、照片或模拟来了解美学结果。106名仍符合条件的女性中有78人(74%)参加了为期一年的随访。与标准护理或观看 2D 照片相比,术前 3D-SI 标准化模拟不会影响患者对美学结果的感知,使用 VAS (p = 0.40) 或 BREAST-Q 评分进行测量,包括对信息的满意度 (p = 0.76)、对乳房的满意度 (p = 0.70) 和社会心理健康领域 (p = 0.81)。此外,它也没有改变患者报告的满意度。这些结果表明,在术前环境中使用广范围局部切除术或一级肿瘤整形手术模拟并不会对美学效果产生不切实际的期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preoperative three-dimensional simulation of the breast appearance after wide local excision or level one oncoplastic techniques for breast-conserving treatment does not set unrealistic expectations for aesthetic outcome: One-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial

Introduction

Simulation of aesthetic outcomes of wide local excision and level one oncoplastic breast conserving treatment (BCT) using 3-dimensional surface imaging (3D-SI) prepares women for their aesthetic outcome. It remains unknown whether women’s memory of this information at the one-year follow-up matches their perception of reality or affects the quality of life.

Methods

With ethical approval, a prospective 3-arm RCT was conducted and it included 3D-simulation, viewing post-operative 2D photographs of other women and standard care. At one-year post-surgery, the participants completed a visual analogue scale (VAS) for the question “How well do you think the information about how your breasts are likely to look after surgery reflects how they actually look today?” and the BCT BREAST-Q module. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used to examine between-group differences at a 5% significance level.

Results

From 2017 to 2019, 117 women completed the primary endpoint of being informed about the aesthetic outcome via verbal description, photographs or simulation. Seventy-eight (74%) of the 106 women who remained eligible attended the one-year follow-up. The standardised preoperative 3D-SI simulation did not affect the patient’s perception of the aesthetic outcome compared to standard care or viewing 2D photographs as measured using the VAS (p = 0.40) or BREAST-Q scores for satisfaction with information (p = 0.76), satisfaction with breasts (p = 0.70), and psychosocial wellbeing domains (p = 0.81).

Discussion

Viewing their own 3D-SI standardised simulation did not significantly affect how the participants perceived their aesthetic outcome. In addition, it did not alter the patient-reported satisfaction. These results demonstrated that simulation for wide local excision or level one oncoplastic surgery does not set unrealistic expectations of the aesthetic outcome when used in a preoperative setting.

Synopsis

The use of a non-bespoke three-dimensional simulation of the aesthetic outcome for breast conserving treatment in the preoperative setting does not over-inflate expectations compared to standard care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
578
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: JPRAS An International Journal of Surgical Reconstruction is one of the world''s leading international journals, covering all the reconstructive and aesthetic aspects of plastic surgery. The journal presents the latest surgical procedures with audit and outcome studies of new and established techniques in plastic surgery including: cleft lip and palate and other heads and neck surgery, hand surgery, lower limb trauma, burns, skin cancer, breast surgery and aesthetic surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信