牙髓治疗后牙齿修复中生物仿生方面的临床评估(随机临床试验)

Sameh Abou-Steit, Marwa Salem, Sarah Omar, Nouran Mahmoud
{"title":"牙髓治疗后牙齿修复中生物仿生方面的临床评估(随机临床试验)","authors":"Sameh Abou-Steit, Marwa Salem, Sarah Omar, Nouran Mahmoud","doi":"10.21608/edj.2024.291267.3045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To clinically evaluate the performance of lithium disilicate endocrowns and overlays, restoring root canal treated molars for one year. Methods: A total of 50 restorations, 25 overlays (group O) and 25 endocrowns (group E), were fabricated to restore root canal treated molars. All restorations were fabricated from lithium disilicate (IPS e. max CAD). After tooth preparation, digital impression was done followed by designing, milling and cementation of the restorations. Evaluation was done every 3 month for 12 months by three independent assessors using Modified USPHS criteria. Statistical analysis of collected data was performed with SPSS 20® , Graph Pad Prism® and Microsoft Excel 2016. Results: Regarding fracture and marginal adaptation, all restorations in both groups had Alpha score (100%); at base line and during the follow-ups. While for retention, all restorations in both groups had Alpha score (100%); at base line, after 3, 6, and 9 months. However, after 12 months, there was insignificant difference between both groups (P=0.08) as Alpha was (87, 100%) while Charlie was (13, 0%) regarding Group O & E respectively. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, e.max overlays showed good performance compared to e.max endocrowns for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth, after one year of clinical evaluation. E.max overlays represent a dependable restorative modality for endodontically treated molars.","PeriodicalId":11504,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian dental journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical evaluation of the biomimetic aspect in the restoration of endodontically treated teeth (Randomized clinical trial)\",\"authors\":\"Sameh Abou-Steit, Marwa Salem, Sarah Omar, Nouran Mahmoud\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/edj.2024.291267.3045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To clinically evaluate the performance of lithium disilicate endocrowns and overlays, restoring root canal treated molars for one year. Methods: A total of 50 restorations, 25 overlays (group O) and 25 endocrowns (group E), were fabricated to restore root canal treated molars. All restorations were fabricated from lithium disilicate (IPS e. max CAD). After tooth preparation, digital impression was done followed by designing, milling and cementation of the restorations. Evaluation was done every 3 month for 12 months by three independent assessors using Modified USPHS criteria. Statistical analysis of collected data was performed with SPSS 20® , Graph Pad Prism® and Microsoft Excel 2016. Results: Regarding fracture and marginal adaptation, all restorations in both groups had Alpha score (100%); at base line and during the follow-ups. While for retention, all restorations in both groups had Alpha score (100%); at base line, after 3, 6, and 9 months. However, after 12 months, there was insignificant difference between both groups (P=0.08) as Alpha was (87, 100%) while Charlie was (13, 0%) regarding Group O & E respectively. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, e.max overlays showed good performance compared to e.max endocrowns for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth, after one year of clinical evaluation. E.max overlays represent a dependable restorative modality for endodontically treated molars.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian dental journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian dental journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2024.291267.3045\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2024.291267.3045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:对二硅酸锂内冠和覆盖层修复根管治疗磨牙一年的性能进行临床评估。方法:共 50 个修复体,25 个覆盖体(O 组):共制作了 50 个修复体,其中 25 个覆盖体(O 组)和 25 个内冠(E 组),用于修复根管治疗过的磨牙。所有修复体均由二硅酸锂(IPS e. max CAD)制成。牙体预备后,进行数字印模,然后设计、铣削和粘接修复体。在 12 个月的时间里,由三位独立的评估人员采用修改后的 USPHS 标准每 3 个月进行一次评估。使用 SPSS 20®、Graph Pad Prism® 和 Microsoft Excel 2016 对收集的数据进行统计分析。结果在断裂和边缘适应方面,两组的所有修复体在基线和随访期间都获得了 Alpha 分数(100%)。而在固位方面,两组的所有修复体在基线、3、6 和 9 个月后的 Alpha 得分均为(100%)。但在 12 个月后,O 组和 E 组的 Alpha 得分为(87,100%),Charlie 得分为(13,0%),两组之间的差异不明显(P=0.08)。结论在本研究的限制条件下,经过一年的临床评估,e.max覆盖层与e.max内冠相比,在牙髓治疗牙的修复方面表现良好。对于牙髓治疗后的磨牙,e.max覆盖层是一种可靠的修复方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical evaluation of the biomimetic aspect in the restoration of endodontically treated teeth (Randomized clinical trial)
Purpose: To clinically evaluate the performance of lithium disilicate endocrowns and overlays, restoring root canal treated molars for one year. Methods: A total of 50 restorations, 25 overlays (group O) and 25 endocrowns (group E), were fabricated to restore root canal treated molars. All restorations were fabricated from lithium disilicate (IPS e. max CAD). After tooth preparation, digital impression was done followed by designing, milling and cementation of the restorations. Evaluation was done every 3 month for 12 months by three independent assessors using Modified USPHS criteria. Statistical analysis of collected data was performed with SPSS 20® , Graph Pad Prism® and Microsoft Excel 2016. Results: Regarding fracture and marginal adaptation, all restorations in both groups had Alpha score (100%); at base line and during the follow-ups. While for retention, all restorations in both groups had Alpha score (100%); at base line, after 3, 6, and 9 months. However, after 12 months, there was insignificant difference between both groups (P=0.08) as Alpha was (87, 100%) while Charlie was (13, 0%) regarding Group O & E respectively. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, e.max overlays showed good performance compared to e.max endocrowns for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth, after one year of clinical evaluation. E.max overlays represent a dependable restorative modality for endodontically treated molars.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信