{"title":"腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术后体重反弹的管理:回顾性研究","authors":"Tarek A. Osman, Ahmed S. Mohamed, Ahmed Shoka","doi":"10.21608/ejsur.2024.357138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". ABSTRACT Background/Objective: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is an efficient bariatric procedure. However, weight regain (WR) endangers its outcomes in ~10–20% of patients. In this study, we aim to unravel the weight loss outcomes of combined Limb distalization (LD) and laparoscopic pouch resizing (LPR) versus LD only. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively followed patients who had either type I LD or combined LPR and type I LD for WR post-RYGB over a 2-year follow-up period. Patients who had more than one bariatric procedure were excluded. WR is defined as a regain of greater than or equal to 5 kg/m 2 of the BMI, and/or a regain of 25% of percentage excess weight loss (%EWL). Results: During the study period from December 2019 to July 2023, 24 patients with WR after previous RYGB were enrolled. Eleven patients had type I LD (group A) while 13 patients had combined LPR and LD (group B). Both procedures had significantly higher %EWL and lower BMI than the preintervention values at one year of follow-up. Combined LPR and LD patients continued to lose weight significantly over the second year with a statistically significant drop in the mean BMI (from 31.9±6.8 to 28.7±7.1) and a similar rise in the mean %EWL (from 66.1±8.2 to 70.3±6.7), whereas LD patients had no additional significant weight loss at the 2-year follow-up. Combined LPR and LD led to more weight loss which is statistically significant at both 1-and 2-year follow-up ( P=0.046 , P=0.021 , respectively). Additionally, 20.8% of our patients developed complications with no mortality recorded. Only one patient had a relapse of obesity-related comorbidity. Conclusion: Patients with combined LPR and type I LD achieved more superior and durable weight loss at a 2-year follow-up compared to type I LD only.","PeriodicalId":22550,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Journal of Surgery","volume":"49 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of weight regain after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: A retrospective study\",\"authors\":\"Tarek A. Osman, Ahmed S. Mohamed, Ahmed Shoka\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/ejsur.2024.357138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". ABSTRACT Background/Objective: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is an efficient bariatric procedure. However, weight regain (WR) endangers its outcomes in ~10–20% of patients. In this study, we aim to unravel the weight loss outcomes of combined Limb distalization (LD) and laparoscopic pouch resizing (LPR) versus LD only. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively followed patients who had either type I LD or combined LPR and type I LD for WR post-RYGB over a 2-year follow-up period. Patients who had more than one bariatric procedure were excluded. WR is defined as a regain of greater than or equal to 5 kg/m 2 of the BMI, and/or a regain of 25% of percentage excess weight loss (%EWL). Results: During the study period from December 2019 to July 2023, 24 patients with WR after previous RYGB were enrolled. Eleven patients had type I LD (group A) while 13 patients had combined LPR and LD (group B). Both procedures had significantly higher %EWL and lower BMI than the preintervention values at one year of follow-up. Combined LPR and LD patients continued to lose weight significantly over the second year with a statistically significant drop in the mean BMI (from 31.9±6.8 to 28.7±7.1) and a similar rise in the mean %EWL (from 66.1±8.2 to 70.3±6.7), whereas LD patients had no additional significant weight loss at the 2-year follow-up. Combined LPR and LD led to more weight loss which is statistically significant at both 1-and 2-year follow-up ( P=0.046 , P=0.021 , respectively). Additionally, 20.8% of our patients developed complications with no mortality recorded. Only one patient had a relapse of obesity-related comorbidity. Conclusion: Patients with combined LPR and type I LD achieved more superior and durable weight loss at a 2-year follow-up compared to type I LD only.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Egyptian Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"49 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Egyptian Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejsur.2024.357138\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejsur.2024.357138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Management of weight regain after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: A retrospective study
. ABSTRACT Background/Objective: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is an efficient bariatric procedure. However, weight regain (WR) endangers its outcomes in ~10–20% of patients. In this study, we aim to unravel the weight loss outcomes of combined Limb distalization (LD) and laparoscopic pouch resizing (LPR) versus LD only. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively followed patients who had either type I LD or combined LPR and type I LD for WR post-RYGB over a 2-year follow-up period. Patients who had more than one bariatric procedure were excluded. WR is defined as a regain of greater than or equal to 5 kg/m 2 of the BMI, and/or a regain of 25% of percentage excess weight loss (%EWL). Results: During the study period from December 2019 to July 2023, 24 patients with WR after previous RYGB were enrolled. Eleven patients had type I LD (group A) while 13 patients had combined LPR and LD (group B). Both procedures had significantly higher %EWL and lower BMI than the preintervention values at one year of follow-up. Combined LPR and LD patients continued to lose weight significantly over the second year with a statistically significant drop in the mean BMI (from 31.9±6.8 to 28.7±7.1) and a similar rise in the mean %EWL (from 66.1±8.2 to 70.3±6.7), whereas LD patients had no additional significant weight loss at the 2-year follow-up. Combined LPR and LD led to more weight loss which is statistically significant at both 1-and 2-year follow-up ( P=0.046 , P=0.021 , respectively). Additionally, 20.8% of our patients developed complications with no mortality recorded. Only one patient had a relapse of obesity-related comorbidity. Conclusion: Patients with combined LPR and type I LD achieved more superior and durable weight loss at a 2-year follow-up compared to type I LD only.